Now be honest, did you spell that with or without google?
I cannot tell a lie, I posted, googled, then edited. I was close though, just missed the c at the end of Humperdinck.
Now be honest, did you spell that with or without google?
I think where Keatts would struggle off the bat is that instant credibility and recruiting connections that Counzo would have. That's not to say that Keatts wouldn't be able to recruit here, but he'd need to develop those connections, which takes time.
If Moore is part of a package deal with Cuonzo, I'd concede that he probably has the advantage over Keatts for Ayo Dosunmu. But Keatts doesn't have a lesser shot at Dosunmu than he has at the next big Chicago kid three years from now. If he's a big time recruiter, he's going to be one from his first footstep in Champaign.
You think that if Moore comes with Cuonzo we have a better shot at Ayo? While I'm not complaining at all isn't that creating a pretty big log jam? Unless this means we lose Fraizer which creates a bit of a scare next year.
So, Cuonzo kind of makes the perfect rebuttal to this. He was a mid-major coach with a very similar (but inferior) resume to Keatts, and when he took the Tennessee job, with no connections to the area he immediately landed 5-star Jarnell Stokes from Memphis. Then when he went to Cal, with no West Coast connections whatsoever he immediately landed Ivan Rabb from Oakland, and then got Jaylen Brown all the way from Georgia.
You could find a dozen examples like that. Good recruiters do their work quickly. Bad ones need years to build the kinds of relationships that can get to a commitment, and they don't have a great batting average even when they get there. Or they operate like Bruce Weber where they lock down kids before anyone else is on the scene and just cross their fingers and hope they develop.
The evidence that our next coach is going to have a stronger pitch to the 2021 class than the 2018 class is very scant.
And lets not overrate the existing ties that Cuonzo has. Tracy Webster knows people in Chicago and obviously Cuonzo is familiar with the Irvins from swooping in for Charlie Moore. But it's still going to be a question of going out and selling what can happen at Illinois. It's a different pitch.
If Moore is part of a package deal with Cuonzo, I'd concede that he probably has the advantage over Keatts for Ayo Dosunmu. But Keatts doesn't have a lesser shot at Dosunmu than he has at the next big Chicago kid three years from now. If he's a big time recruiter, he's going to be one from his first footstep in Champaign.
Are you all serious about Keatts as #1 preferred candidate?
I would say he is way down the list if on it at all.
I'd just give that up completely now.
We will get more established and proven than that.
He may end of good but not going to be at Illinois.
Are you all serious about Keatts as #1 preferred candidate?
I would say he is way down the list if on it at all.
I'd just give that up completely now.
We will get more established and proven than that.
He may end of good but not going to be at Illinois.
Putting him in a top 5 of realistic candidates (Bennett, for example, is not someone I view as realistic) is not really far fetched or inappropriate considering his resume
I see what you're saying, good recruiters are good recruiters, but do you think Keatts would recruit a better 2018 class at Illinois than Counzo?
So, Cuonzo kind of makes the perfect rebuttal to this. He was a mid-major coach with a very similar (but inferior) resume to Keatts, and when he took the Tennessee job, with no connections to the area he immediately landed 5-star Jarnell Stokes from Memphis. Then when he went to Cal, with no West Coast connections whatsoever he immediately landed Ivan Rabb from Oakland, and then got Jaylen Brown all the way from Georgia.
You could find a dozen examples like that. Good recruiters do their work quickly. Bad ones need years to build the kinds of relationships that can get to a commitment, and they don't have a great batting average even when they get there. Or they operate like Bruce Weber where they lock down kids before anyone else is on the scene and just cross their fingers and hope they develop.
The evidence that our next coach is going to have a stronger pitch to the 2021 class than the 2018 class is very scant.
And lets not overrate the existing ties that Cuonzo has. Tracy Webster knows people in Chicago and obviously Cuonzo is familiar with the Irvins from swooping in for Charlie Moore. But it's still going to be a question of going out and selling what can happen at Illinois. It's a different pitch.
If Moore is part of a package deal with Cuonzo, I'd concede that he probably has the advantage over Keatts for Ayo Dosunmu. But Keatts doesn't have a lesser shot at Dosunmu than he has at the next big Chicago kid three years from now. If he's a big time recruiter, he's going to be one from his first footstep in Champaign.
Projecting Keatts ability to recruit 4-5 star guys to Illinois is impossible. We won't know until he tries. People here can debate it until the cows come home - you just don't know.
On the other hand, we've got a pretty good idea Martin can do it.
Are you all serious about Keatts as #1 preferred candidate?
I would say he is way down the list if on it at all.
I'd just give that up completely now.
We will get more established and proven than that.
He may end of good but not going to be at Illinois.
Welcome back Kramer. Thanks for bringing a voice of reason.
I have a really hard time believing Whitman is going to risk his job on Keatts. As I've said, he's going to choose the safest pair of hands he can find. He's smart enough to know that this is not the right time to take a big risk.
There is one caveat here. Keatts will be considered strongly if he goes on a Cinderella run in the tournament.
I have a really hard time believing Whitman is going to risk his job on Keatts. As I've said, he's going to choose the safest pair of hands he can find. He's smart enough to know that this is not the right time to take a big risk.
There is one caveat here. Keatts will be considered strongly if he goes on a Cinderella run in the tournament.
We know Martin can do it to UT and Cal (I kid, that certainly projects well for Martin, although 4* talent isn't really new to us)
Keatts was lead recruiter on plenty of guys at UL that would've been great lands for us (Quentin Snider!), I think that's pretty projectable, unless you don't give Tilmon credit for Walker because he's an assistant.
You can believe what you want, but you have no idea. You have no idea how important Keatts was and whether he can recruit without Pitino and the Louisville brand and recruiting machine behind him. YOU JUST DON"T KNOW.
Yes, Josh is a smart guy.
Josh is smarter than that, right? Winning a couple games in a tournament isn't that significant, didn't we just learn this via Groce?
We don't know that Cuonzo can marshal the Illini brand to great success in recruiting either.
We have more substance to make us confident, but we don't know.
The way I see it:
The coach we hire comes from either P5 or NBA we are not hiring small school coach.
That coach will have his staff in place already with at least one former college head coach as main x and o guy. Walker will have a spot to help bridge the regimes and to build on STL momentum. Last guy will be another recruiter working with said coach already or one who has personal connection to coach in important areas recruiting wise.
Whitman is not going to just fire Groce without all of this vetted and figured out first.
A mid-major Final Four run has been somewhat predictive of coaching success.
Walker will have a spot to help bridge the regimes and to build on STL momentum.
:huh:
Sample size?