UNLV 89, Illinois 82 POSTGAME

#101      
That is every bit as preposterous as it has been for every single miserable pile of garbage season that has followed 2005.

The only team in that group that you could even make a colorable argument lacked the talent to compete at a high level was - ironically - by far the best of those teams, 2008-09.

The cavalry is not coming. Ayo Dosunmu isn't some unheard-of coup for post-05 Illini recruiting, and he's one guy at that.

If this is what Brad Underwood is going to produce out of this level of talent, then we're in for 3-4 years of humiliating catastrophe.

I don't believe that for a variety of reasons, mainly young guys who don't know what they're doing yet gaining experience. But lets be real, there's a healthy dose of vain, blind hope that this fanbase that has given more and received less over the past decade-plus than any other Power Five school by an order of magnitude could not possibly continue to be punished this cruelly, that the imminent non-viability of Big Ten revenue sports at U of I as a commercial entity can't possibly be real.

Forgive my wooden-ness, but your last clause of that last (long, run-on) sentence ends up leaving me wondering what exactly you're saying there. I savvy your heavy dose of negativity, though; that comes in loud and clear. Seems way, way early to get to that point, but to each his own. I'm not seeing humiliating catastrophe coming; maybe I'll be blind-sided.
 
#102      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
Those who are saying we need an influx of talent on this roster, I would ask which class over the first 11 games has you most optimistic, 2014, 15, 16 or 17?

'17 was Underwood's first class that he put/kept together within mere moments of being hired.

If and that's the big word here, IF he can continue to bring in that kind of talent, the future of the program is extremely bright with the brand of basketball he brings.

I do agree though, Ayo alone is far from enough for next year. Flo will hopefully see plenty of opportunity this coming week on his visit.

No doubt it's the 2017 class. I think it's a very, very good class -- but it's missing a key ingredient: a developed big man.

Get classes akin to 2017 -- and perhaps upgrade the bigs we're recruiting -- and we'll be in good shape.

The 2015 class just killed us. A pair of top-50 kids both transferred out. And no bigs.
 
#103      
Watching the game on tape. The last several games Finke has really been falling back as he shoots every shot. I think if he would just go straight up it would help a ton...
 
#104      

Hoppy2105

Little Rock, Arkansas
You compete to win, not sure what "simply to compete" means.

We have the talent to not get our doors blown off several times a year like with Groce. (Which sucks because it was roughly the same amount of talent.)

That's what I mean by simply being able to compete. With a change of mindset, attitude, and talent, we will compete at the higher levels of the B1G. (meaning...we will be able to win more games)

Yeah, you're always competing to win, I guess I was just trying to say that we aren't in a talent dearth that makes us lose by tons. We are in positions to win games...just can't get over the hump. Hopefully the talent upgrade (at the right positions) gets us there.
 
#105      
But we just burned through 2 coaches who left the program worse than they found it

Not sure about that. I'd argue that Weber really left the program much worse than obviously what he found, which was an amazing team. I do not think Groce left the program in worse shape and actually (even with the loss of Tilmon) the current state is a little better (or equal at worst) than what Bruce left in 2012. Yet, it was too little, too late and Groce failed to significantly upgrade the talent level. The early promise and signs of a recruiting turnaround under Groce never really materialized until it was probably too late.

Much of the success for Underwood will also depend on his ability to upgrade the overall talent level (which is correlated but different than just rankings).
 
#106      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
So for me this lack of talent talk begs the question(s): Did BU's teams at SFA compete at a high level with their talent? With the exception of Jawun Evans, was OKSt's talent level much higher than ours right now?
 
#107      
Dude, it's not the LEVEL of talent. This isn't a matter of averaging the recruiting rankings of all the players, and spitting out some talent indicator.

This is about having talent in the right positions -- and with experience. Our most talented kid BY FAR is a freshman. We don't have a single rim protector. And our depth in the front court is nonexistent. I like Spicy G's future here, but he's very clearly a project -- and a freshman project, at that.

Lack of depth =/= Lack of talent
Lack of experience =/= Lack of talent
Lack of positional balance =/= Lack of talent
Lack of fit to system =/= Lack of talent


Some of those other things are problems for this Illini team. The talent is not.

By the way......we have a grand total of 4 top-100 kids on our roster: Mark Smith, Trent Frazier, Aaron Jordan, and Leron Black. And two of those -- Frazier and Jordan -- were by no means consensus top-100 kids.

And the idea that we're suddenly going to wake up with 10 is ahistorical and fanciful.

Brad Underwood's success is predicated on building a 3rd outpost of what Bob Huggins is doing at WVU and what Frank Martin is doing at KSU/South Carolina. Are those teams loaded with elite recruits? Do they have the talent to compete?

What those teams have is a bottomless supply of Kipper Nichols' and Damonte Williams' who play with their hair on fire and execute flawlessly.

They also have big, long rim protectors, which we need badly, agreed.
 
#108      
We have the talent to not get our doors blown off several times a year like with Groce. (Which sucks because it was roughly the same amount of talent.)

That's what I mean by simply being able to compete. With a change of mindset, attitude, and talent, we will compete at the higher levels of the B1G. (meaning...we will be able to win more games)

Yeah, you're always competing to win, I guess I was just trying to say that we aren't in a talent dearth that makes us lose by tons. We are in positions to win games...just can't get over the hump. Hopefully the talent upgrade (at the right positions) gets us there.

I am honestly not sure about that. We were a "bubble" team under Groce and we look as a bubble team (at best) right now. We have also not faced the better teams, our competition has been middle of the pack (all losses) and our wins are against low teams so far.
 
#109      
So for me this lack of talent talk begs the question(s): Did BU's teams at SFA compete at a high level with their talent? With the exception of Jawun Evans, was OKSt's talent level much higher than ours right now?

What BU did at SFA is certainly admirable, but there is a huge difference competing with SFA in a very low conference (not even mid-major) and consistently competing in the B1G.
 
#110      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
What BU did at SFA is certainly admirable, but there is a huge difference competing with SFA in a very low conference (not even mid-major) and consistently competing in the B1G.

I get that, but didn't those teams compete in the NCAA as well? Against some pretty good teams.
 
#111      

Hoppy2105

Little Rock, Arkansas
I get that, but didn't those teams compete in the NCAA as well? Against some pretty good teams.

Definitely, but you can't always go off of NCAA wins to judge a team. See Groce for a perfect example.

BU will earn his pay by doing what he did in conference at SFA, here in Champaign. (hopefully to the same degree!)

I am honestly not sure about that. We were a "bubble" team under Groce and we look as a bubble team (at best) right now. We have also not faced the better teams, our competition has been middle of the pack (all losses) and our wins are against low teams so far.

We will see if BU can make a turnaround in B1G play like he did last year at OSU. We are a bubble team for sure, hopefully he can squeeze a lot of wins out of this team and set us up for success next year.
 
Last edited:
#112      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
Well, pour orange kool aid over my head and color me enthusiastic, but I think Frazier, Damonte, Black, Smith, and Kipper on the current team are all talented enough to win in the BIG. Add Ayo next year and there is more than enough talent to win.

We are judging this current groups talent while they are trying to ingest an entire new system as freshman and sophs after 4 losses. Once they learn to play without the silly fouls, and they will, once this system clicks, and it will, they will win in the BIG.
 
Last edited:
#113      

GortTheRobot

North Bethesda, Maryland
You compete to win, not sure what "simply to compete" means. Our talent level has screamed perennial bubble for the last 12 years (with the exception of 2010-11). Some enjoyable moments, some learning moments, some fun moment, but overall a team that strives to become the 7th or 8th team in the B1G that hopes to hear their name gets called on selection Sunday.

To take the next step and becoming a team that consistently feels secure on making the tournament, we need to improve overall talent. That's the next step, which is still short of consistently competing to win the B1G. We are far from competing for B1G titles.

For the most part, I agree with your assessment, and I'm not going to take things out of context to strengthen my own argument, so my thoughts are an addendum, not refutation.

We need an upgrade, but having a coaching staff that can recognize talent means we don't have to swing for the fences all the time like Groce tried to do. That doesn't mean we shouldn't go for 4 and 5 stars, just that it's nice to know we can work with a combination of 3, 4, and an occasional 5 with a good coach.

Yes, we are far from B1G titles, but not that far from being a top 5 team. I see us in the top 5 or 6 next year and solidly in the dance.
 
#114      
Our overall talent is definitely not enough to consistently compete. As I said, without upgrading the overall talent, the bar will perennially stay at just making the tournament. Almost every team can claim that they have had stretches of good or adequate basketball, but overall talent prohibits you from obtaining consistency.

There is a clear separation between "liking" players, rooting for players, wanting players to improve, etc. and having the overall talent to become a consistent winner in the B1G. This is a fun team to watch develop, especially for some of us, yet not a team that has the ability to be a consistent winner.

And in U's first year (make that 8-9 months) you were expecting what, exactly?
 
#115      
I think our talent level in the 1-3 spots is good. It's also inexperienced.

We are definitely behind the 8-ball this year in the frontcourt. I think Leron could start on many Big Ten teams, and Finke would get good minutes on most Big Ten teams, but that's not enough.

I think you make a good point that if satisfaction is based on winning, this year is going to be rough. But we just burned through 2 coaches who left the program worse than they found it, and there is a lot of uphill work to do just to get us to the middle of the pack. It won't happen overnight, and if we can't enjoy these high-energy, competitive games (Maryland, UNLV) and enjoy watching the growth of our young players, we're unreasonable.

Personally, I'm loving these games. Watching the team get better, watching hard-fought, close basketball games--this is why I tune in. Sure I want the wins, but those will come as the team grows up and learns Underwood's style. The older players need to unlearn Groceball, and the younger players need to gain experience. For now, at least they are entertaining.
This! Perfectly said...

Sent from my VS500 using Tapatalk
 
#116      
Broken record... very thin on the frontcourt and need to upgrade talent level. Contrary to popular belief on this board that talent has not been a problem, fans now come to a realization that unless we upgrade overall talent, just making the tournament will remain the perennial goal every season.

It does not mean that we have bad players or no likable, just that it takes more to consistently compete in B1G and college basketball. BU seems like a very good coach IMO, but his success will hinder on his ability to bring talent via recruiting. And please save the "Ayo says hello" posts, Ayo is clearly not enough.

This is a fun team to watch develop, but if satisfaction is just based on winning, some may likely get disappointed.

I still think it's way too early to say we don't have the talent. You can tell the team is still lost out there half the time. And I think we can all agree we haven't played a full 40 min of good basketball yet (or even 25-30 min). But yet we could still be undefeated right now. I think it's much more appropriate to discuss the talent thing in February.
 
#117      
We do not have the talent to compete for national champions or FF, but from Groce year 1 we have enough talent to make the tourney and be 9~10 seeds. We did not have the right coaching and development.
 
#118      

blmillini

Bloomington, IL
Dude, it's not the LEVEL of talent. This isn't a matter of averaging the recruiting rankings of all the players, and spitting out some talent indicator.

This is about having talent in the right positions -- and with experience. Our most talented kid BY FAR is a freshman. We don't have a single rim protector. And our depth in the front court is nonexistent. I like Spicy G's future here, but he's very clearly a project -- and a freshman project, at that.

By the way......we have a grand total of 4 top-100 kids on our roster: Mark Smith, Trent Frazier, Aaron Jordan, and Leron Black. And two of those -- Frazier and Jordan -- were by no means consensus top-100 kids.

Think about that for a second. 4 top-100 kids, total. And not a single one over 6'7. If you think this is sufficient talent to go where we need to go as a program, we'll have to respectfully agree to disagree.

UNLV and Maryland were certainly more talented than we were. Probably a wash with Wake Forest. NW probably less so, but far more experienced. Bottom line is, we need to be on a Maryland/Ohio State/Michigan type of talent level, and we're not even close yet.

Who is our most talented kid by Far? That honor seems to change almost every game. So far this year I would suggest that it has been... Jordan, Finke, Smith, Lucas, Frazier, Nichols and Black. And, of the Freshman, I'm not sure you could pick between Smith, Frazier and Williams right now.
 
#119      
Broken record... very thin on the frontcourt and need to upgrade talent level. Contrary to popular belief on this board that talent has not been a problem, fans now come to a realization that unless we upgrade overall talent, just making the tournament will remain the perennial goal every season.

It does not mean that we have bad players or no likable, just that it takes more to consistently compete in B1G and college basketball. BU seems like a very good coach IMO, but his success will hinder on his ability to bring talent via recruiting. And please save the "Ayo says hello" posts, Ayo is clearly not enough.

This is a fun team to watch develop, but if satisfaction is just based on winning, some may likely get disappointed.

Just out of curiosity -- Say in '19, we so happen to land Okoro & Liddel, and perhaps one of Khalil Whitney/Malik Hall. For the hell of it, say we add a decent transfer big in the meantime. I realize that's all easier said than done, but if that were to happen, do you feel that meets the level of talent required to "consistently compete"?
 
#120      

IlliniMed

Lillington, N.C.
I would like everyone to sit back and imagine a period in time with our current frehsman class as seniors/Juniors and a crop of equal or more talented recruting classes coming in.... scary exciting thought.
 
#121      
Concerns:

1. Blaming the refs for foul calls won't help us. We had foul problems almost every game of the season, and I do not think all refs on earth just hate us. If we cannot fix it going on, it's on the coaching staff. Teaching players to adjust to new rules and do not make stupid fouls should not be that hard. Coaches are professionals to do that.

2. Kipper is a very good player but not in the way he is used now. BU wants him to be the passer and dribbler from high post, but I see too many TOs and bad decisions from Kipper in that role. He is one of the better 3 point shooters on the team and can grab some offensive rebounds from nowhere, and he is so good in defense, but he is not a quality high post coordinator, as of now.

3. If there is one place for Finke in B1G, then it is a bench stretch 4 who comes on shooting some corner 3s and then goes back sitting. The way we use him is beyond his ceiling and will cost us against any competitive opponents. He is too slow in doing anything to make his shooting and passing ability to work on high level.

4. We probably need a dedicated post to monitor Black's injury. But I think it's a good idea to rest Black in the longwood game and give Spicy G more chances. From the limited time in this game, I see Spicy G's potential to fight the best bigs in the country and he's not as an big offensive burden I thought him to be.

5. The lack of perimeter threat from Lucas and Alstork makes the lane very congested . Those one-dimensional players should come from bench to do what they can, not starting. We have great spacing when Frazier and Jordan is in game. They are also plus defenders on this team.

6. We can win this game if we zone and make McCoy sandwich the whole game. The stupid pressing defense (which left McCoy totally open and gifted mooreling a clear lane to drive) at the start of game cost us several fouls and 10 points deficiencies which decided the game. The in-game defense strategy of BU will be his and our major weakness onward if BU refuses to adapt. BU's defense coaching is better than I thought and his team plays with great energy. But almost every game BU tries to do something stupidly risky in certain period of game and gifts some points to the opponent.
 
Last edited:
#122      
At the under 3:00 mark, we were only down 73-71 and then TJL's TO opened the flood gates. Final score was not indicative of how close that game was.
 
#123      

Oldtoysrock

Sarasota, Florida
The first I knew Black had an injury is when I saw him with a sling on left arm during the second half. There was no mention from the TV broadcast of what caused the injury. It goes with saying that Black is so valuable , particularly going into BIG play.



Of course there was no mention of Leron’s injury during the broadcast, they were too busy talking to Kareem about his life, his book, and everything except this game. From just after half time until nearly the 11+ minute mark.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
#124      
Concerns:

1. Blaming the refs for foul calls won't help us. We had foul problems almost every game of the season, and I do not think all refs on earth just hate us. If we cannot fix it going on, it's on the coaching staff. Teaching players to adjust to new rules and do not make stupid fouls should not be that hard. Coaches are professionals to do that.

2. Kipper is a very good player but not in the way he is used now. BU wants him to be the passer and dribbler from high post, but I see too many TOs and bad decisions from Kipper in that role. He is one of the better 3 point shooters on the team and can grab some offensive rebounds from nowhere, and he is so good in defense, but he is not a quality high post coordinator, as of now.

3. If there is one place for Finke in B1G, then it is a bench stretch 4 who comes on shooting some corner 3s and then goes back sitting. The way we use him is beyond his ceiling and will cost us against any competitive opponents. He is too slow in doing anything to make his shooting and passing ability to work on high level.

4. We probably need a dedicated post to monitor Black's injury. But I think it's a good idea to rest Black in the longwood game and give Spicy G more chances. From the limited time in this game, I see Spicy G's potential to fight the best bigs in the country and he's not as an big offensive burden I thought him to be.

5. The lack of perimeter threat from Lucas and Alstork makes the lane very congested . Those one-dimensional players should come from bench to do what they can, not starting. We have great spacing when Frazier and Jordan is in game. They are also plus defenders on this team.

6. We can win this game if we zone and make McCoy sandwich the whole game. The stupid pressing defense (which left McCoy totally open and gifted mooreling a clear lane to drive) at the start of game cost us several fouls and 10 points deficiencies which decided the game. The in-game defense strategy of BU will be his and our major weakness onward if BU refuses to adapt. BU's defense coaching is better than I thought and his team plays with great energy. But almost every game BU tries to do something stupidly risky in certain period of game and gifts some points to the opponent.

I agree a zone defense likely will cut down on fouls. But I wonder if coach is more interested in playing and teaching with his system. Which I can respect if it results in long-term success. At OKC I believe he changed defensive schemes when he realized they didn't have the athletes. He had said Illinois has better athletes than OKst.
 
#125      
I am still on the BU train! Team definitely needs to upgrade talent in front court and needs to find an established shooter to ever compete in Big Dance though. I love the style of play and I see a culture change taking place. Won’t be able to overhaul program without those additions though