Austin Colbert sighting on ESPN
Can someone plays explain to me how he NCAA makes two potential #11 seeds play each other n a play in game?
If I head correctly - I haven't lookd at a bracket - the winner is a #11 seed. So if the loser had the potential to be a #11 seed as well, doesn't that imply both teams are better than the #12-16 seeds?
Shouldn't the play in game be the last two #16 seeds?
Can someone plays explain to me how he NCAA makes two potential #11 seeds play each other n a play in game?
If I head correctly - I haven't lookd at a bracket - the winner is a #11 seed. So if the loser had the potential to be a #11 seed as well, doesn't that imply both teams are better than the #12-16 seeds?
Shouldn't the play in game be the last two #16 seeds?
Ok, second post answers question if the play in game still considered an automatic bid, even though you don't technically make the field of 64. Apparently the play in game does count.
Response makes sense. Not sure I 100% agree with reasoning, but I see why they did it.
Maybe time to get rid of play in game? Let the UCLA's and St. Bonaventures of the world, this year's examples, go right to the NIT.
Man Holiday single handed ruined that game for UCLA. Too bad for FBW
Ok, second post answers question if the play in game still considered an automatic bid, even though you don't technically make the field of 64. Apparently the play in game does count.
Response makes sense. Not sure I 100% agree with reasoning, but I see why they did it.
Maybe time to get rid of play in game? Let the UCLA's and St. Bonaventures of the world, this year's examples, go right to the NIT.