Never suggested that the staff doesn't have backup targets but I question the strategy to go after mostly plan A guys in the Fall and use the spring for plan B guys. I have no problem with targeting these top guys but the balance doesn't seem quite right.
I think that's a pretty big assumption to make, though. The big names get all the reporting. When the staff goes to Peach Jam and watches a big name, that doesn't stop them from also watching, evaluating, and talking to other players there as well, though, and I would be incredibly surprised if the staff didn't have more irons in the fire than has been publicized.
Every year it seems we heard late fall about some clear plan B prospect that pops up on our radar and it turns out we've actually been on him for a while. I don't see why this year would be any different. Given the long time spent in the recruiting and/or coaching realm by each of our staff members, I simply find it unlikely that our staff has not been talking to other recruits in the event that their plan A guys don't work out. They've been in this business long enough to know that is a very risky strategy.
This simply seems like the most plausible scenario here, and in the absence of any real information, we all have to go on what is most probable. I'll (un)happily eat crow if I am proved wrong later.