Take it for what you will.
Take it for what you will.
![]()
Carolina still gets a golden pass, right?
I just CAN’T press the Like button here. I wish there were a DISLIKE button, Dan…
What type of NIL case are you talking of? Improper coordination?I cannot wait for the beating the NCAA is going to take in the first lawsuit that gets filed against them in an NIL enforcement case.
And a lot of you will be on the NCAA's side!
(It's stress we absolutely don't need, but a part of me hopes it's us. Josh Whitman would be a wonderful spokesperson to burn it all to the ground where it belongs.)
Inducement to a recruit was what I had in mind, but they'll have the school dead to rights on both, the school will sue, and the NCAA will get the treatment from the real authorities that they've deserved for decades.What type of NIL case are you talking of? Improper coordination?
I have no idea what you're talking about. NIL is legal.Inducement to a recruit was what I had in mind, but they'll have the school dead to rights on both, the school will sue, and the NCAA will get the treatment from the real authorities that they've deserved for decades.
Amateurism is over and never coming back, I just hope we get a really big bang of public humiliation for the NCAA enforcement crew before it fades from memory.
Yes but it's against current NCAA rules to use an NIL deal as an inducement to play at a particular school. Even though every single one of them is unambiguously that. You're just sorta not supposed to say it out loud.I have no idea what you're talking about. NIL is legal.
Ideal orchestration...A&M wayYes but it's against current NCAA rules to use an NIL deal as an inducement to play at a particular school. Even though every single one of them is unambiguously that. You're just sorta not supposed to say it out loud.
The NCAA is waiting for a case where they have everybody on record saying the quiet part loud to make their big move. That school will sue. And the legal community of both sides of the political divide is done with defending the NCAA cartel, it will go very badly for them.
Yes but it's against current NCAA rules to use an NIL deal as an inducement to play at a particular school. Even though every single one of them is unambiguously that. You're just sorta not supposed to say it out loud.
The NCAA is waiting for a case where they have everybody on record saying the quiet part loud to make their big move. That school will sue. And the legal community of both sides of the political divide is done with defending the NCAA cartel, it will go very badly for them.
This is where we disagree.The NCAA *is* the schools
I'm gonna stop you right there. In my previous higher ed career, I had to deal directly with the NCAA many times. Rest assured that the member schools do not consider themselves "The NCAA." There were very few staffers I dealt with in Indianapolis whom I would consider first-rate administrators. This is evidenced by their failure to lead the way on NIL, thereby leaving the inmates to set the rules of the asylum. I've never seen another organization that suffers from paralysis by analysis like the NCAA. According to their outdated amateurism model, students cannot be paid to play sports. Period. Along comes NIL, and the NCAA spent the bulk of its time and resources trying to figure out how to say that this isn't pay to play, when it clearly is. They should have been out front with rules for NIL, but they dithered so long that state legislatures finally said f*** it, we'll do it ourselves. At that point, the NCAA was neutered in the NIL game.The NCAA *is* the schools,
panic-allowed NIL
I agree that they are probably dying for an NIL infraction case to come up so that they can assert their authority
We clearly are in total agreement on the underlying situation here.I don't doubt that there are people in the bureaucracy that still think they can enforce their will, but at least regarding NIL, I don't see them having a leg to stand on. I would add, that not only do they have a proven loser on this, but they'd also be taking on the richest programs, their fanbases, and state legislatures that view this as a political issue.
Sounds like a solid pattern for the GuardiansIdeal orchestration...A&M way
1. Jimbo Fisher gets his recruiting target list and starts his calls to recruits...NO NIL references in his pitch to recruits.
2. Jimbo releases his recruiting target list to his A&M cashbox NIL group.
3. A&M NIL group independently reaches out to A&M recruit targets with handsome offers
4. A&M lands the #1 recruiting class
A&M staff never "enticed"...
Take it for what you will.
![]()
The first domino to fall that loosened their God-like grip on college athletics was the TV deals that schools and conferences negotiated for themselves. This reduced the reliance on NCAA-brokered deals ,and brought in much more money. Everything in college sports has to do with money. For a long time, the NCAA was the banker. Now it's not. That's eroded their influence to the point that member schools just aren't afraid of them anymore.The NCAA used to have a lot more power to assert, so it could become self-serving in the ways you indicate. They were the cops, everyone else had to play by their rules or risk enormous consequences. That's going to lead to arrogance unless they're held accountable, and for a very long time, they weren't. Things have changed though, and not by a little bit.
I don't doubt that there are people in the bureaucracy that still think they can enforce their will, but at least regarding NIL, I don't see them having a leg to stand on. I would add, that not only do they have a proven loser on this, but they'd also be taking on the richest programs, their fanbases, and state legislatures that view this as a political issue.
That's some good and heady analysis there, but I think something is missing from the picture: athletes have a lot more power now then they did just a year or two ago. I'm pretty sure this is because they were *very close* to forming a union, which would have been destructive to the NCAA. It's not a perfect system by any means...but isn't it at least plausible that NCAA adopted NIL as a bulwark against collective bargaining?This is where we disagree.
The NCAA is an entrenched bureaucracy very separate from major conference football that opened the door wider than they realized when they panic-allowed NIL to take root.
Maybe you're right that they know they're dead in the water if they try to pull the reins back and reassert their power. I predict you aren't though.
The letter of the law is being violated with absolutely every single NIL arrangement. It is openly and unambiguously recruiting inducement payments in every last case, with the full knowledge of coaches and administrators. The NIL rules as written say you can't do that. The NCAA will try to find an unsympathetic case and drop the hammer, that's my prediction. And then the fun begins.
What the hell is an Independent Panel????....and what is the panel independent of??......Did the NCAA hire this panel????.....How many individuals were on this panel???....typical NCAA Bullslip .......![]()
Independent panel: Memphis Tigers basketball coach Penny Hardaway did not violate NCAA rules in providing benefits to prospective student-athletes
An independent panel has ruled that Memphis basketball coach Penny Hardaway didn't violate NCAA rules by providing benefits to prospective student-athletes, but Memphis is on probation through Sept. 26, 2025, and must pay fines for committing violations.www.espn.com
Ya, I'm not buying this at all...