Pregame: Illinois at Purdue, Sunday, March 5th, 11:30am CT, FOX

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1      

Dan

Admin
Illinois at Purdue
Sunday, March 5th
11:30am CT
FOX
 
#3      
Is resting your starters when you’ve locked the top spot a thing in basketball? I guess they’re still playing for a #1 seed in the big dance so maybe not.
 
#5      
Anyone else hoping we stick with tonight’s starting five for the Purdue game and into March even if Epps comes back and is healthy?

In my opinion..
* RJ is finally playing well enough to start
* the length of the lineup with RJ over Epps is so good, and it’s a much more defensively sound lineup.
* We have enough ball handling between Shannon, Mayer and a little CoHawk that we don’t really need a traditional PG, and in fact a wing shooter is a better natural fit and helps us have clearly defined roles
 
#8      
Anyone else hoping we stick with tonight’s starting five for the Purdue game and into March even if Epps comes back and is healthy?

In my opinion..
* RJ is finally playing well enough to start
* the length of the lineup with RJ over Epps is so good, and it’s a much more defensively sound lineup.
* We have enough ball handling between Shannon, Mayer and a little CoHawk that we don’t really need a traditional PG, and in fact a wing shooter is a better natural fit and helps us have clearly defined roles
And Ty handling the ball. He is the guy that is blowing up in terms of growth.
 
#10      
Gotta keep driving the ball even with Edey down there. Driving will get us to the line more, increase the chances of Edey getting in foul trouble, and lead to better quality outside shots. Drive!
Edey is terrible on D - he is immobile. Huge reach, though.
 
#13      
This. Edey is unable to move out on the 10 footer without fouling, so he has been coached not to move. On the other end, let Edey have his 25 pts, but guard the arc. And pressure the freshmen guards.
And work the refs hard on Edey's hook and hold and aggressive bodying in the post. He's one of the roughest players I've ever seen, yet seems to get the refs on his side way more than Kofi did.
 
#14      
Winners against Purdue are hitting 10 ft in-paint shots at high rate and keeping Boiler's 3p % down.

Unfortunately not a lot of players have that as part of their game and our guys haven't shown that much besides maybe Ty sometimes. Consistently the narrative is that Edey is slow and bad defensively but he know how's to be in the right position most of the time and alters a TON of shots without fouling.
 
#23      
I’ve said it before but outside of Edey (who is a matchup problem for anyone) I think we match up well with Purdue.

Even assuming Morton has the size and athleticism (big assumption) to lock up one of TJ/Mayer, they don’t have anyone to slow down the other. I don’t know who they have who can match up with Ty physically, and Coleman is a matchup problem for them too. And now all of a sudden RJ has his mojo back, I don’t think they have anyone who can stay in front of him either.

Biggest key on defense will be to pressure their guards with Ty/Sencire. Try to speed them up and make it hard for them to enter it into the post. After that strategically trap Edey but the point of emphasis should be not giving them open 3’s.

If we play like we did last night I think we have a great chance at winning. Give the big his 30 but Purdue doesn’t have a Bufkin or Howard to go get 20+.

I also think we can play a lot better than we did last night.
 
#24      
I've been thinking to myself that Purdue doesn't really look all that intimidating, especially of late. They haven't really passed the eye test of an elite team, in most of their recent games, with last night at Wisconsin certainly being no exception.

Stating the obvious, it will really come down to which teams show up - for both PU and for us. My point is we can win this game, and I don't think it's as unlikely as some seem to.

Plenty for our guys to play for. It could mean an extra day of rest and preparation for the BTT. Let's go get it! I-L-L!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back