This isn't the right way to look at it.
There is, at this point, an entire industry of people who have the part- or full-time job of being a "Selection Committee interpreter"....they offer clarifications on the process based on discussions they are having with people on the committee or in the room. Every single year, it gets brought up that "the committee likes a storyline" - if this were patently false, there is a squadron of Joe Lunardis out there who would readily shoot it down, doing their sources a solid. Instead the opposite happens - they nod along and tacitly admit that yeah, all else being equal, if there is something the committee can smugly point to and tell themselves "ooh, the people will enjoy that!" they do it. It doesn't have anything to do with Illinois specifically.