Is that not what Harmon projects to be on a P6 team? At least?
He's really not a PG at all and averaged more turnovers than assists in both seasons at Utah Valley.
And his breakout in the NIT was really playing as a bully-ball bucket getting 2. A poor man's TSJ.
The moment when it was suggested that Harmon might swap out for his teammate Trey Woodbury was a ray of hope, but alas.
I do agree though that Harmon as lead guard will be an experiment we'll be forced into.
Rodgers at the 1 will last half a game in the real world, that's just not a thing. Same as the brief flirtations with Hawkins there.
The GOOD news is that because this roster is very good in terms of passing up and down the lineup, plus a higher degree of familiarity with each other and the system, the demands on that PG position are not super high. We don't need some master orchestrator there. But we do need a point guard.
I would not be shocked if one of DGL, Sincere, Moretti or Harmon (in that order) turns out to give us just enough to allow the strength of the rest of the roster to shine through and avoid a disastrous mess. I would be shocked if a Rodgers, TSJ, Domask, Hawkins, Dainja type lineup is viable. We're gonna look like we did against Arkansas when we couldn't run anything and real guards were just taking the ball away from us at will.