Not sure where you got thatThe point I'm trying to refute is that TSJ was the equivalent of someone like Tre White or Desmond Claude in terms of hype and expectations, an under-the-radar mystery project type.
Not sure where you got thatThe point I'm trying to refute is that TSJ was the equivalent of someone like Tre White or Desmond Claude in terms of hype and expectations, an under-the-radar mystery project type.
im sure booth and coleman could coexist similar to GQ and coleman. problem is neither of them want to play the 5, so youre right.Why would they take Booth and vise versa if Coleman was coming back. I hope so just doesn't seem realistic
That's awesome except college basketball teams don't win with a how many top freshman you have.I wouldn't laugh too hard. Duke is bringing in the number 1, 3, 12, 17, 18, and 51 recruits. Plus they can hit the transfer portal too.
The players that will be on the team next season.I know it's really early in the process and will reserve judgment until it all shakes out. Right now it seems like we need a couple guys that are just pure scorers. Domask getting a waiver would certainly help. Who else is going to carry the scoring load?
ESPN has Pringle at 6'10" 230. He ain't undersized, that's a big dude with a big dude's game.I get pringle is much more of a center/PNR guy, but 247 has pringle and humrichous both at 6'9. Were gonna get cooked again if our plan at C is a PNR undersized tweener
Mayer was really good, we would have been horrendous without him last year.My comment was about Mayer being a big fish that wasn’t worth the hype.
We’re heavily involved …
![]()
Nick Pringle - Men's Basketball - Alabama Athletics
Nick Pringle (23) Forward - 2023-24 Saw action in 34 games including 16 starts Averaged 6.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, 0.7 assists and 0.7 blocks per game Posted ...rolltide.com
www.illinoisloyalty.com
There’s no way that that link has his correct stats right?We’re heavily involved …
![]()
Nick Pringle - Men's Basketball - Alabama Athletics
Nick Pringle (23) Forward - 2023-24 Saw action in 34 games including 16 starts Averaged 6.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, 0.7 assists and 0.7 blocks per game Posted ...rolltide.com
Yeah that’s accurate. I mean, he only shoots around the rim and only played 8 mins a game that year. But still impressive!There’s no way that that link has his correct stats right?
It says Pringle:
- Shot 84.7 percent from the field throughout the season
Agree on both counts. Pringle certainly doesn’t look undersized on tape…ESPN has Pringle at 6'10" 230. He ain't undersized, that's a big dude with a big dude's game.
Humrichous is a big combo forward that wants to shoot a bunch of 3's and doesn't rebound much, very different player.
Mayer was really good, we would have been horrendous without him last year.
I place a lot of culture blame at his feet (I know some others disagree), and I don't know if he was the 10th best transfer in the country, but as a basketball player he was as advertised and essential for us.
He didn't shoot 84.7% when they played UConn. . . and didn't get a single rebound either.There’s no way that that link has his correct stats right?
It says Pringle:
- Shot 84.7 percent from the field throughout the season
I’d guess Pringle is not the primary target, but I doubt he is looking to leave a final four squad to ride the pine.Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread
nope as in no or that it's too much to ask for?? I woke up this morning thinking it was Friday, I need a(nother) win...www.illinoisloyalty.com
Based on this post by @LvilleILL yesterday, my assumption would be that Nick Pringle is not the big name big he referred to. (Sorry if I'm wrong and he is). But I'm sure Brad has contingencies upon contingencies, and I wonder if Pringle would be a big that has a more modest price tag that we could bring in if we end up spending big on a wing and a combo guard instead. Seems like we have the money to spend big on 2 guys, and while maybe plan A is this big and wing @LvilleILL referred to, it makes sense that we'd be looking at other options as well - and maybe one of those options is 2 big time wings/guards and then a role player big.
That's awesome except college basketball teams don't win with a how many top freshman you have.
Because 1. you need more than five players (your starters) 2. Coleman coming back is far from a given. 3. They could both be on their court together. Most teams these days don't play class Centers at the 5. They play forwards that can pop out and shoot. (Edey and Clingan are the exception, not the norm).im sure booth and coleman could coexist similar to GQ and coleman. problem is neither of them want to play the 5, so youre right.
Yeah I assume he would start. I meant role player in the same vein that Ty was last year, or Quincy. He'd be a 1 year rental to get Morez some experience off the bench before handing him the keys.I’d guess Pringle is not the primary target, but I doubt he is looking to leave a final four squad to ride the pine.
Are we really? Kind of a head scratcher if you ask me, based on his production and who we already have.We’re heavily involved …
![]()
Nick Pringle - Men's Basketball - Alabama Athletics
Nick Pringle (23) Forward - 2023-24 Saw action in 34 games including 16 starts Averaged 6.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, 0.7 assists and 0.7 blocks per game Posted ...rolltide.com
That’s kind of the way I’d view him. Someone to push Rez, but not necessarily be blocking his way.Yeah I assume he would start. I meant role player in the same vein that Ty was last year, or Quincy. He'd be a 1 year rental to get Morez some experience off the bench before handing him the keys.
Interesting it came from Chester. I'm assuming that was a jab. If he's implying that Brad whats the big names this makes more bullish about the direction of the program.
Anytime I watch Dan Hurley, I get it, but I also want to punch him.
I wouldn't really read all that much into it, and Chester brought in some really good players while winning a Big Ten regular season and tournament title here.Interesting it came from Chester. I'm assuming that was a jab. Chet can recruit his "diamonds in the rough", team guys with very limited talent. Luckily we have a body of evidence of more than a decade about how that turns out.
These are the types of kids we landed for over a decade under Weber/Groce.