Pregame: Illinois at Nebraska, Thursday, January 30th, 7:30pm CT, FS1

Status
Not open for further replies.
#152      
View attachment 39209
why yes , yes you can.....................have a nice day..................
Please please skip this if you are not a grammar curmudgeon.
Since we seem to be a little silly today, I'll ponder: had the original poster asked, "MAY I steal those?" would we would have been in a pickle? Had Pru (gentleman that he is) said "yes" to that, then his grant of permission would have meant that the re-use by the poster was authorized, and therefore not "stealing".
The question though was "CAN I steal those", which we curmudgeons know questions the physical capacity to do something, not whether the act is condoned. By saying "yes", Pru technically only affirmed that the original poster has the PHYSICAL CAPACITY to repeat those puns. (We know the poster can post, so it's that clear that the poster "can" steal the puns.) Whether he "may" do so or not is unresolved, isn't it?
 
#153      
arrested development pout GIF
 
#154      
Please please skip this if you are not a grammar curmudgeon.
Since we seem to be a little silly today, I'll ponder: had the original poster asked, "MAY I steal those?" would we would have been in a pickle? Had Pru (gentleman that he is) said "yes" to that, then his grant of permission would have meant that the re-use by the poster was authorized, and therefore not "stealing".
The question though was "CAN I steal those", which we curmudgeons know questions the physical capacity to do something, not whether the act is condoned. By saying "yes", Pru technically only affirmed that the original poster has the PHYSICAL CAPACITY to repeat those puns. (We know the poster can post, so it's that clear that the poster "can" steal the puns.) Whether he "may" do so or not is unresolved, isn't it?
I am the one who asked, but it was merely for entertainment purposes/appreciation of Pru. I am a connoisseur of dad jokes and I have seen most of, if not all of those before. And I really, really enjoy Pru's posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RML
#156      
Would probably prepare for him to be out until late February.

If we figure that Brad saying he had Strep throat was actually misdiagnosed Mono then his quote was that he was on antibiotics for 3 days before the Michigan State game.

That puts us at January 16th for the onset. He won't be cleared by team doctors until his spleen is not at risk of rupturing. The general timeline is 3 weeks for return to exercise/cardio and 4 weeks for return to contact.

4 weeks would put us at Feb 13th but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a ramp up period and his return at Wisconsin on the 18th or vs Duke on the 22nd.

However, mono can stick around for months and it's possible the return is later or that he isn't back at full strength all season. It's also not uncommon to see people lose significant amounts of weight due to mono which would impact the entire season.

Sam Darnold pretty famously had mono a few years ago and sat 4 weeks(3 games plus a bye) basically a month from diagnosis to playing again. Jack Quinn(hockey) missed 5.5 weeks a few years ago due to mono.
 
#157      
Can't fall asleep against Nebraska especially at their place. Nebraska also gives up alot of threes to opposing teams this season. No doubt, our guys are going to bomb it away from beyond the arc. Lol. My hope is we make at least 10 3s. Our guys got to be consistent on making the 3s.
 
#158      
Desperately need to step up and get two wins this week ... this will change, but as of now these are two Quad 1 opportunities. If we are all going to bed on Sunday night and the Illini are 16-6 overall, 8-4 in the Big Ten and 6-5 in Quad 1 games ... hell, that would certainly make up for the two home losses for me!

While the defensive effort absolutely has to be there (defense travels, after all!), this team REALLY needs to start maintaining a higher level of scoring. This is only against "major conference" opponents this season:

Wins: 89.3 PPG vs. 72.9 PAPG
Losses: 72.0 PPG vs. 81.6 PAPG

So in our losses, we are giving up almost 9 more points per game ... but we are SCORING more than 17 fewer points per game. And here is how we shot so far this year in those games, with wins in orange and losses in blue. I also included today's AP rankings as some sort of context:

FIELD GOALS
57.5% at #16 Oregon
52.6% vs. Arkansas (Kansas City, MO)
47.0% at Washington

46.5% in average win
45.1% vs. #4 Alabama (Birmingham, AL)
44.6% vs. Northwestern
44.2% vs. Penn State
43.9% vs. #20 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)

42.9% in average game
42.4% at #7 Michigan State
42.2% vs. #17 Wisconsin
40.0% at Indiana

38.2% in average loss
37.7% vs. Maryland
37.3% at Northwestern
37.1% vs. USC
29.4% vs. #8 Tennessee


THREE-POINTERS
55.2% at #16 Oregon
48.4% vs. Arkansas (Kansas City, MO)
34.8% in average win
(obviously driven up by Oregon!)
34.4% at Indiana
33.3% vs. #4 Alabama (Birmingham, AL)
32.3% vs. Penn State
30.8% vs. #20 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)
30.3% vs. #17 Wisconsin

30.0% in average game
28.1% vs. Northwestern
26.5% at Northwestern
23.6% in average loss
21.9% vs. USC
21.4% vs. Maryland
20.8% at #7 Michigan State

19.2% at Washington
17.4% vs. #8 Tennessee

So a couple takeaways...
- While you get some more variation with the 3-point shooting (e.g., we shot terribly at Washington but grinded out a win), the overall shooting is pretty clear. If this squad can make over 40% of its field goals, we will be very difficult to beat. I still haven't figured out that November Alabama game, and it doesn't really fit into my picture of this team, good or bad. However, other than that our only loss when shooting above 40% is at Michigan State. And on that note...
- The numbers reinforce what a ridiculously unlucky loss that was in East Lansing. If we make ONE more 3-pointer and shoot slightly worse than we did in the atrocious OT loss at Northwestern, we win. This says nothing of missed layups, KJ out with ridiculous foul trouble, the technical, etc. SO many unforced errors, and we lost by two. Super frustrating.
- As we all probably expected, the Oregon and Arkansas games indeed stand out as good representations of this team's ceiling. We played great basketball in practically every aspect.
- The NU home win yesterday serves as a good reminder to this team that it doesn't have to come via the three! We shot below our average from three, but we shot above our average overall. If the threes aren't falling ... go inside!!
- It is truly astounding that we were so close to knocking off Tennessee. Our offensive performance that game was just abysmal - last in both categories above. Looking back, I am pretty proud of the defense and the effort in that one, and I am less frustrated with the loss (other than the "so close!" aspect, of course).

TL;DR for Nebraska

While we obviously need to be mentally focused and bring appropriate effort on the defensive end, I am now more convinced than ever that this team really just needs to hit BASIC open shots to get back on track. When we turn in even serviceable shooting performances, we are damn good. As quoted above, we are 8-2 vs. major conference opponents when we shoot over 40% from the field; the only two losses were to Alabama way back in November and the utterly frustrating screw job at Michigan State. That's it. Don't miss layups, hit even a C minus-level of 3-pointers, bring effort, and not many teams will beat us. And at this level ... I would contend that missing wide open shots and/or layups with a large enough sample size is more mental than anything else. FOCUS, and bring home a big road win!!

#18 Illinois 83
Nebraska 70
Great work as usual. FYI, I truly pour over your posts. It is fun. Thanks for efforts. I agree completely about being happy with overall season.The only loss that I have understanding was at Northwestern. I also want to add that W over Mizzou is looking real good. Which I told my son (Mizzou grad) after we watched the game. I said that game was going to be good for both teams at the end of the year. I predicted MO would be .500 in the SEC.
 
#159      
Don't ask him questions like that. Leave him go. He's on a roll.
 
#165      
Great work as usual. FYI, I truly pour over your posts. It is fun. Thanks for efforts. I agree completely about being happy with overall season.The only loss that I have understanding was at Northwestern. I also want to add that W over Mizzou is looking real good. Which I told my son (Mizzou grad) after we watched the game. I said that game was going to be good for both teams at the end of the year. I predicted MO would be .500 in the SEC.
Yeah, I was at the Northwestern game, so I tried to craft a narrative why it was fine to cope through the weekend ... "OT Quad 1 losses on the road in conference play are not that big of a deal." However, as more time has passed, the way in which we lost that one was just so irritating and avoidable, and it would be really nice to trade that one for a Quad 1 win.

Oddly enough, the loss that bothers me surprisingly little now is Tennessee. I would have loved to see us storm the floor after beating #1, but with how Tennessee has moved slightly down the rankings and yet still remained a very clear Quad 1 opponent ... it's just not that big of a deal.
 
#166      
Hard to get a clear gage on this game, especially with Tomi out.

Hoiberg has done a nice job getting the program to respectability in recent seasons, but they have had games this year when they have been abysmal. Someone earlier in this thread said that Hoiberg always has them playing hard and that is just flatly not true.

They lost to Michigan State by 37, to Purdue by 36 and most recently to Wisconsin by 28. Now, all three were on the road and those are three of the best teams in the conference, but they did not even look like they had any interest in competing.

Nebraska has always been a very tough place to play in front of their home fans, but the Huskers have currently lost 6 straight games including back-to-back home losses to lower tier Big Ten teams, USC and Rutgers. So they may come out desperate to make one last gasp to save their season or could be ready to completely let go of the rope and pack it in with their post season hopes all but gone anyway.

A fast start would be key as I imagine the enthusiasm of the home fans is hanging by a thread.

Juwan Gary and Brice Williams are good and Essegian can be a dangerous three point shooter, but this will not be a Maryland situation where they have big men who can take over the game. Their bigs are all smaller than Morez and honestly shouldn't even be the type to get him in foul trouble unless he makes stupid mistakes. It's the type of matchup where even Ben shouldn't struggle too much if he had to play some 5 in a pinch.

If this were a home game I would predict something like the first 35 minutes of the Northwestern game. But Big Ten road games especially in a tough environment are rarely that easy.

ILL 82
NEB 74
 
#171      
Probably because it's copypasta from parade.com
 
#172      
Yeah, I was at the Northwestern game, so I tried to craft a narrative why it was fine to cope through the weekend ... "OT Quad 1 losses on the road in conference play are not that big of a deal." However, as more time has passed, the way in which we lost that one was just so irritating and avoidable, and it would be really nice to trade that one for a Quad 1 win.

Oddly enough, the loss that bothers me surprisingly little now is Tennessee. I would have loved to see us storm the floor after beating #1, but with how Tennessee has moved slightly down the rankings and yet still remained a very clear Quad 1 opponent ... it's just not that big of a deal.

I've actually gotten more frustrated with that loss, mainly because I watched Tennessee lose back-to-back games against Auburn and Kentucky where they threw up brick after brick and fell short in both games.

It's frustrating that they got the plays they needed to win late on our home floor, but not in recent weeks. The Vols are tough as nails defensively though so I don't feel too bad about the performance of the offense in hindsight.
 
#173      
Nebraskas whole defensive scheme is based around baiting teams into 3s and you know we’re taking that bait. We live and die by the 3 but especially this game, inevitably gonna shoot a high volume so need to shoot above our average
 
#175      
Nebraskas whole defensive scheme is based around baiting teams into 3s and you know we’re taking that bait. We live and die by the 3 but especially this game, inevitably gonna shoot a high volume so need to shoot above our average
Please please let us take the right ones, and not have the wrong guys taking questionable ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back