Please provide five (5) separate and independent bases, with citations, which you believe make you qualified to ask that question.Is Hamer still coaching our defense?
Give me 5 independent bases for why you feel the need to be an a-hole for no reason?Please provide five (5) separate and independent bases, with citations, which you believe make you qualified to ask that question.
I think there was an implied /s?Give me 5 independent bases for why you feel the need to be an a-hole for no reason?
Give me 5 independent bases for why you feel the need to be an a-hole for no reason?
Is Hamer still coaching our defense?
I might expect the guy who can't count to ten to miss this, but seriously?Give me 5 independent bases for why you feel the need to be an a-hole for no reason?
Come on, pretty clear this was a riff on the long conversation yesterday.Give me 5 independent bases for why you feel the need to be an a-hole for no reason?
Maybe that would have been obvious to someone who was in any way involved in the long conversation yesterday.Come on, pretty clear this was a riff on the long conversation yesterday.
Well maybe then you ask a question instead of immediately jumping to 'a-hole'? You're a highly recognizable and frequent poster here and the original assumption was probably that you had read the thread, and would get the joke without further explanation.Maybe that would have been obvious to someone who was in any way involved in the long conversation yesterday.
Come on, pretty clear this was a riff on the long conversation yesterday.
Maybe that would have been obvious to someone who was in any way involved in the long conversation yesterday.
Well maybe then you ask a question instead of immediately jumping to 'a-hole'? You're a highly recognizable and frequent poster here and the original assumption was probably that you had read the thread, and would get the joke without further explanation.
While that assumption turned out to be false, that did not merit the escalation. IMO anyway.
Maybe that would have been obvious to someone who was in any way involved in the long conversation yesterday.
