GrayGhost77
- Centennial, CO
No idea either, and I'm not even THAT old.OK, I am showing my age here and maybe the fact that I don't do Social Media, but I have no idea who that even is.
No idea either, and I'm not even THAT old.OK, I am showing my age here and maybe the fact that I don't do Social Media, but I have no idea who that even is.
Alice Cooper>>>Alex CooperNo idea either, and I'm not even THAT old.
I thought it did say Alice Cooper. I had to reread it.Alice Cooper>>>Alex Cooper
Actually, it's probably the opposite or it can at least be looked at in a different perspective. You are saying:-- We have Tucker guaranteed for an entire season
-- 34-year old Boyd with a superb career year
-- Suzuki with a definite career year
-- Michael Busch has exploded
-- PCA with perhaps a career year (MVP candidate; sorta like R. Sandberg in 1984)
-- Can't imagine our Catchers will repeat their collective season in 2026
-- A bullpen of no-names is Top 5 in all of baseball
-- The Ricketts' pockets are bulging with cash
I think this is exactly the type of season in which you buy what's needed, yes even at the expense of the MiLB system. The stars have aligned for Jed.
"Take pie, when pie is passed."
I wrote a book on post #1221. I definitely don't want to rehash it.You are at least the second person to say you wouldn’t give up a top prospect for a SP out there. I’m curious what your and other people’s definition of “top prospect” is? What’s the cutoff? Top 100 overall prospect? Top 5 in Cubs organization? Top 10? 20? 30?
Obviously ability of the SP and contract status impacts things, but if last year is any indication, likely won’t take a top 5 guy but we could be talking about a prospect in top 10 and another in top 20. Is that too high a price to pay in general in your book?
Attendance is going to be there no matter what.re the Ricketts family one wonders a little , what return exactly are they willing to accept , in order to have a team that can win the division or get a wild card spot . And then , have a reasonable chance to advance a round or two or to the WS.
If you factor in the increase in value since they purchased , they are WAY WAY ahead of any main stream tech index .
there just isn’t that much risk in owning a major pro sports franchise in a major city .
There is zero risk.re the Ricketts family one wonders a little , what return exactly are they willing to accept , in order to have a team that can win the division or get a wild card spot . And then , have a reasonable chance to advance a round or two or to the WS.
If you factor in the increase in value since they purchased , they are WAY WAY ahead of any main stream tech index .
there just isn’t that much risk in owning a major pro sports franchise in a major city .
You mention 6 things that are potentially a problem next year or at least not as likely to be as positive (unless they sign Tucker), but said they are set up well for the future? And it seems like this is based a lot on how you value the prospects we have, but it is unlikely all of them pan out. Yes, the team now has some holes, but we’re not talking about a team struggling to make a wild card spot making deals. This is a team with second best record in NL and fourth overall. And making a couple of deals can plug some of those holes without demolishing farm system.I wrote a book on post #1221. I definitely don't want to rehash it.
I think that there are way too many question marks to give up prospects, at position of what could be significant need, going forward.
Unless they commit to Tucker....I don't see how they could rationalize giving up Caissie, Alcantara or Triantos.
Unless Ricketts commits to spending on pitching and you can guarantee a healthy Steele coming back, I can't see rationalizing giving up any pitching.
Unless we can confirm that Shaw will indeed hit and they will resign Hoerner in 2027....I can't see how you can send any infield prospects packing.
The biggest question, as we sit here right now....are the Cubs one starter away from being able to match the Dodgers or Phillies in a five or seven game series? Are they magically going to start being consistent against left handed pitching?
It's not a matter of the # next to a prospects name, it's where the needs potentially lie.
Before Hoyer makes any decisions, he needs to know if Ricketts is "all in" after this season.
This is EXACTLY where I'm at. You summed up my blowhard comment in one sentence. I'm all for making reasonable improvements and take a shot. I just don't want to see them unload the system, when I know Ricketts won't do what needs to be done in the off-season.You mention 6 things that are potentially a problem next year or at least not as likely to be as positive (unless they sign Tucker), but said they are set up well for the future? And it seems like this is based a lot on how you value the prospects we have, but it is unlikely all of them pan out. Yes, the team now has some holes, but we’re not talking about a team struggling to make a wild card spot making deals. This is a team with second best record in NL and fourth overall. And making a couple of deals can plug some of those holes without demolishing farm system.
Look we’re not going to change each other’s minds. We’ll see what happens. I will say that many of the prospects you mentioned, no one is really advocating to trade other than I mentioned Triantos or one of their middle infielder prospects with ETAs from 2027 to 2030. Based on last year’s trade deadline deals for SP, that is probably the starting point for a good SP given that I agree that some of the guys you mentioned are unlikely to be traded. I think one of those guys plus a prospect in the 15-30 range is an acceptable risk to try and take advantage of the unexpected positives we’ve seen cuz LAD with their SP question marks and Phila don’t really scare me if we can plug a couple of holes. No assurance that Cubs will get to WS let alone win it. But don’t think anyone had a TX/AZ World Series two years ago. Cubs shouldn’t go for it at all costs, but need to try at least to capitalize on this season IMO.
Agreed, Caissie and Ballesteros are guys who have no place right now. They will bring you a nice haul in trades. But not for a rental. If we are trading those two, we need guys with years left.Completely agree. I wouldn’t gut the system and trade 3 or 4 top 5 prospects, but if one has to go along with multiple in the 10-30 range to get pieces we need then so be it. Cubs have a fair amount of middle infielder types in the 10-25 range that I hope are appealing to other clubs. Just saw this report on one of our top 5 guys and the last sentence says it all. Not saying I want to see Owen go, but some prospects are going to have to.
Owen Caissie, OF, Chicago Cubs, 22, AAA
Prospect fatigue has hit Caissie hard at this point, but it is important to remember that he is still just 22 years old. Sure, on the surface, you see a 30 percent strikeout rate. But you also see a strong .280/.388/.556 slash line. So, what to make of Owen Caissie’s performance to this point? Especially after blasting two more home runs on Saturday.
From an exit velocity standpoint, Caissie stands out. His 91.5 mph average exit velocity pairs well with an impressive 113.3 max exit velocity and a 107.5 mph 90th percentile exit velocity. The 16 percent barrel rate is tops among Triple-A hitters.
While the strikeout rate is up, Caissie’s contact rates are not all that different from what we are used to seeing. A 69 percent overall mark and a 79 percent zone-contact rate are fine. Caissie even has a respectable 24.5 percent chase rate.
The biggest problem is, Caissie is unlikely to find playing time given the Cubs' outfield situation. When Suzuki is locked in the designated hitter spot, Caissie has a big hill to climb. The Cubs are active in the trade market for a starting pitcher, and Caissie could be an attractive chip.
Absolutely. I think Owen is unlikely to be traded. Moises isn’t likely to be either, though his positional question mark might make it slightly more possible. But if either is traded or most of the guys that Second Place mentioned, it won’t be (or shouldn’t be) for a rental. I like Triantos, who I’ve mentioned, but some of his underlying metrics are suspect — hits the ball on ground too much, low avg launch angle,etc. He does have good bat to ball skills and he’s still young so can still improve in some areas, but I see him as a potential good player not a great one and need to trade quality to get quality. Like I’ve said, don’t want or expect Cubs to guy the farm system. But some surgical cuts to increase likelihood of having a deep playoff run makes sense to me. We’ll see.Agreed, Caissie and Ballesteros are guys who have no place right now. They will bring you a nice haul in trades. But not for a rental. If we are trading those two, we need guys with years left.
And I don’t think Cubs will blow up the farm system. At least I hope not. But some surgical cuts to improve chances makes sense. Last year, LAD picked up top SP on market Flaherty for I think they’re #8 and #20 prospects. Market may be different this year, but something along those lines is a risk worth taking I believe.This is EXACTLY where I'm at. You summed up my blowhard comment in one sentence. I'm all for making reasonable improvements and take a shot. I just don't want to see them unload the system, when I know Ricketts won't do what needs to be done in the off-season.
If he behaved like the owner of a team in the third largest market in the country, I'd feel more confident about Hoyer's decisions.
she should be banned for life from wrigley for that publicity stunt. clearly was making it all about her instead of the fans. much disrespect
This was brutal...
I'm still reflecting on this list which I find to be so appealing. You're the first person to list Lugo as an option in this thread other than myself, and I feel he would be a strong veteran presence especially come the postseason. Suarez will have a great deal of competition, but would be a powerful anchor at 3B. Lopez has some lingering worries on the injury, but as a Twins fan on the AL side, would love to see him in Chicago. Finnegan, lastly, would give the bullpen exactly what Lugo would give the rotation.My ideal trade deadline would be something like:
Seth Lugo from the Royals
Pablo Lopez from the Twins
Eugenio Suarez from the D-backs
Kyle Finnegan from the Nats
A couple mid-rotation starters having nice years. A right handed big-bopper that plays the corner infield. A lock down late inning pitcher.
Only Lopez is signed beyond this year. Cubs probably won’t have to give up too much to acquire any of them.
The rotation would still be pretty lacking in the sexy department, but the team would otherwise be strong top to bottom.
I like the list, just wonder what it would cost. Not sure how likely Cubs are to trade for an injured SP (last I saw ETA is mid- August), though I certainly like him beyond this year.My ideal trade deadline would be something like:
Seth Lugo from the Royals
Pablo Lopez from the Twins
Eugenio Suarez from the D-backs
Kyle Finnegan from the Nats
A couple mid-rotation starters having nice years. A right handed big-bopper that plays the corner infield. A lock down late inning pitcher.
Only Lopez is signed beyond this year. Cubs probably won’t have to give up too much to acquire any of them.
The rotation would still be pretty lacking in the sexy department, but the team would otherwise be strong top to bottom.
Certainly would be cheap. Not sure how much he has left in the tank, but maybe a better option than Shaw at this point.DJ LeMahieu is right there for the taking…3rd base…