With how long he was out the first time, I wouldn't be surprised if he were not much of a factor this year. "Healthy by Thanksgiving, but having to get back into game shape." Bears out of it, he plays sparingly last couple of games. I am not normally this much of a pessimist. I was just surprised that he missed essentially all of training camp with the injury the first time.Johnson out indefinitely, no surprise.
Now requiring surgery and out for the year.With how long he was out the first time, I wouldn't be surprised if he were not much of a factor this year. "Healthy by Thanksgiving, but having to get back into game shape." Bears out of it, he plays sparingly last couple of games. I am not normally this much of a pessimist. I was just surprised that he missed essentially all of training camp with the injury the first time.
That was quick.Now requiring surgery and out for the year.
Apparently that report was premature, still being evaluated.Now requiring surgery and out for the year.
As hard as it is to say anything nice about a Mich alum, he does seem to catch everything within the area code that he is in. Several fully extended arms catches so far (including preseason).I realize it’s only a one game sample size for each, but I remember when we played Michigan thinking Loveland was a very very good player, but thinking “OMG. What do we even do with this guy?” When watching Warren.
So I raised my eyebrows a bit when, given other roster needs, we chose 1. To use a first round pick on a TE. And 2. That TE was Loveland, not Warren. Only a 2 game sample size so who knows but Warren looks like an instant impact game changer (the Colts are 2-0 starting Daniel Jones!) and Loveland can’t seem to get on the field.
Not really a point to my story, just more of the same. Can never figure out what the Bears are thinking.
They could have done what Atlanta did signing 2 studs on the d-line but instead they waste picks on a tight end and a wide receiver. The d-line was a glaring weakness. As is cornerback, even before Johnson got hurt. And offensive tackle.I realize it’s only a one game sample size for each, but I remember when we played Michigan thinking Loveland was a very very good player, but thinking “OMG. What do we even do with this guy?” When watching Warren.
So I raised my eyebrows a bit when, given other roster needs, we chose 1. To use a first round pick on a TE. And 2. That TE was Loveland, not Warren. Only a 2 game sample size so who knows but Warren looks like an instant impact game changer (the Colts are 2-0 starting Daniel Jones!) and Loveland can’t seem to get on the field.
Not really a point to my story, just more of the same. Can never figure out what the Bears are thinking.
Ha. Yes. Burden too. I do like him as a player and they likely got value for him (may be a first round talent they got in the second round), but certainly seemed like a luxury given they had DJ and Rome.They could have done what Atlanta did signing 2 studs on the d-line but instead they waste picks on a tight end and a wide receiver. The d-line was a glaring weakness. As is cornerback, even before Johnson got hurt. And offensive tackle.
They need to get young and build through the draft. The problem is Poles is clueless and in way over his head.
The other two 2nd rd picks were both healthy scratches last game...Ha. Yes. Burden too. I do like him as a player and they likely got value for him (may be a first round talent they got in the second round), but certainly seemed like a luxury given they had DJ and Rome.
What a beauty of a touchdown! This Cowboys defense made Russell Wilson looked like Seattle Russ last week. Pour it on them.
agree with the ugliest partSimultaneously the ugliest and greatest flea flicker ever.