We definitely do. And top tier ones at that. Not a whole lot of game changers on that side of the ball right now.This. Feels like we need several more starters and some depth on the defensive side of the ball
We definitely do. And top tier ones at that. Not a whole lot of game changers on that side of the ball right now.This. Feels like we need several more starters and some depth on the defensive side of the ball
Never forget …
The best gets are the ones you’ve already got …![]()
He looked awesome in the FCs championship game.
Is Jay Norvell helping us with the talent eval of the CSU guys in the portal?
WhyI'm good with not taking any more Colorado State transfers.
Is Jay Norvell helping us with the talent eval of the CSU guys in the portal?
College kickers are a) getting better, and b) even average kickers can kick 40-50 yarers with relative ease. According to sEcSPN, The rate for kicks from 40+ yards has climbed from ~55% (2004-2020) to over 60% since 2021, with 62.2% in 2024.The problem with this logic is that it assumes a replacement kicker would not make those kicks. OK, the USC game he makes a 41-yard kick to win the game. That's not a chip shot, but in college football it's probably about a 70% success rate on those. Olano went 7/8 on those this season, so an 87.5% success rate. So the difference between Olano and an average kicker is about 17.5%. So if that win is worth $200k, Olano's value in that game above an average kicker is maybe $35k. But also keep in mind, it's not like he won the game single handed. A lot of other players had to make plays to put him in a position to make that kick.
Against Tennessee, Olano had 3 FGs within 30 yards. Yes, he is probably more reliable on those than your average NCAA kicker, but even your average kicker should be making those. In fact, there were at least 4 Big Ten kickers who were more reliable on FGs in the 20-29 range than Olano (I'm only counting those with equal or more attempts, but there were also several others who were 100% on fewer attempts), and 2 that were more reliable in the 30-39 range (ditto).
Olano is a very good kicker, which is why he got the bag he got. But if you look around you can see that he is not some irreplaceable unicorn.
Surprised this was on ESPN!ESPN: OK, maybe the SEC isn't actually the dominant conference we advertised it as all season...
![]()
Wetzel: How NIL, transfers and rev share brought the SEC back to the pack
The Big Ten is guaranteed to be playing for a third straight national title. Can the SEC find a way to dominate this new era like it did the previous one?www.espn.com
Article contains quotes from one Bret Bielema.
Better than getting guys from DeVry University.I'm good with not taking any more Colorado State transfers.
or Colorado School of MinesBetter than getting guys from DeVry University.
Are you asking why most people would prefer not to load up on talent from the worst team in the MWC? The linebacker put up the same numbers in the MWC that Hood put up in the Big 10. That would be a concern. Could the CSU players have attributes that could be better maximized by our staff? Absolutely! That isn't always a guarantee.
There’s a great name from the past.well , they need someone, even if it’s not the next Cap Boso