Does it?Which means he wants to keep coaching
Not sure if you have inside info, but most times that offset language includes an obligation to seek employment (duty to mitigate), removing it could mean he's happy to retire early?
Does it?Which means he wants to keep coaching
I view it as if he didn't want to keep coaching why not just force them to pay the lump sum? Taking out the offset language benefits both sides and gives him the most money possible if he takes a new job.Does it?
Not sure if you have inside info, but most times that offset language includes an obligation to seek employment (duty to mitigate), removing it could mean he's happy to retire early?
agree 100%I view it as if he didn't want to keep coaching why not just force them to pay the lump sum? Taking out the offset language benefits both sides and gives him the most money possible if he takes a new job.
It also helps to avoid going through the legal battle that Bielema went through. Bielema did end up short when it was all said and done. So I don't know what to make of it??Does it?
Not sure if you have inside info, but most times that offset language includes an obligation to seek employment (duty to mitigate), removing it could mean he's happy to retire early?
In theory the duty to mitigate demands that he keep at least attempting to find work (and obviously he is objectively very marketable) but as with the Bielema-Arkansas case those are difficult and expensive questions to litigate.I view it as if he didn't want to keep coaching why not just force them to pay the lump sum? Taking out the offset language benefits both sides and gives him the most money possible if he takes a new job.
I view it as if he didn't want to keep coaching why not just force them to pay the lump sum? Taking out the offset language benefits both sides and gives him the most money possible if he takes a new job.
If he didn't want to get back into coaching, his name wouldn't be floated around for DC jobsBingo …
Running back I think it’s dependent on the NFL cycle as staffs fill out.Any guesses on the timing of our new coaches
Seems that means Chris Hurd for STRunning back I think it’s dependent on the NFL cycle as staffs fill out.
ST: Will be promoted from within if I had to guess.
TE: Not sure. A couple options out there.
DC: my guess soonish
Seems that means Chris Hurd for ST
That would be awesome if his health allows him to handle the task.Or Ben Miller …
If we’re awaiting until after the Super Bowl for the defensive opening my guess would be Chris Patridge. Kevin Richardson was on our staff 2 years ago but no way is he a dc candidate
![]()
Seattle Seahawks
Hired on February 22, 2022, to be the team's defensive passing game coordinator/defensive backs coach, Karl Scott enters the 2026 season in that same role, serving in that capacity in three of his four Seahawks seasons. Scott served one season (2021) as twww.seahawks.com
Not sure if he’s the guy, but is a name I’ve heard
![]()
Seattle Seahawks
Hired on February 22, 2022, to be the team's defensive passing game coordinator/defensive backs coach, Karl Scott enters the 2026 season in that same role, serving in that capacity in three of his four Seahawks seasons. Scott served one season (2021) as twww.seahawks.com
Not sure if he’s the guy, but is a name I’ve heard
Not to be an @$$, but just because there’s a Sports Illustrated article asking the commanders to hire him, doesn’t mean he’s off the market…![]()
Why Karl Scott is the 'sleeper' DC candidate Dan Quinn should hire
Scott is the only candidate without NFL play-calling experience, but his development of stars like Devon Witherspoon makes him a high-upside risk.www.si.com