Coaching Carousel (Football)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#276      
This is such a late hire I assume all the good players from Montana have already entered the portal and found new teams
 
#277      
Partridge is on record saying he was, "shocked" to be mentioned as a candidate for the DC job.
The timing of Hauks announcement stepping down coincides with BBs presser talking about scheme change last week.
He (BB), mentioned he was waiting on some waivers. Two Montana players received waivers this week.
Is this a coincidence or am is my tin foil hat too low on my brow?
While this seems like speculation, I can believe it. Last week Chris Partridge had an interview where he said he's never been approached about being IL DC.
 
Last edited:
#279      
So Montana hired Bobby Kennedy whose assassination was fake and has been alive this whole time who has only been there one year as WR coach as their new head coach.

I believe the NCAA rules are now that 5 days after a new coach is hired (which would be today), players at a school that has had a coaching change have 15 days to enter the portal.

Hauck bringing some guys with him would make all of this considerably less mysterious, IMO.
 
#280      
Warner and Wagner convinced this was the first pick and all the Super Bowl comments were a "smokescreen". That seems like a major reach.
If Bret already had his guy what's the point of putting out fake clues to throw people off the scent?
Were there other schools with DC openings in February clamoring to hire a 61 year old FCS Head Coach?
Not saying this is a bad hire, but that take reeks of copium.
His age doesn't mean much at all. We're not making a coordinator hire expecting him to be here 10+ years. His recruiting will be done mostly on campus as Bret desires and the new coach recruiting rules makes doable. And I guarantee a ton of schools would have loved to hire the head coach of one of the best (top 5? top 10 at most) FCS programs who has honestly been better than a ton of d1 programs the last 30 years. Not to mention he is one of the top minds of the scheme Bret wanted to switch to and most likely the ultimate reason we made this hire.
 
#281      
In the era of paying players to play for you, I don’t think recruiting is even a priority. It’s about distributing $$$$ the best way possible and making good evals of the guys you pay big money too. This is pro football now. Pro football teams don’t worry about “recruiting”. The GM is there to do it, and the coaches coach
 
#283      
His age doesn't mean much at all. We're not making a coordinator hire expecting him to be here 10+ years. His recruiting will be done mostly on campus as Bret desires and the new coach recruiting rules makes doable. And I guarantee a ton of schools would have loved to hire the head coach of one of the best (top 5? top 10 at most) FCS programs who has honestly been better than a ton of d1 programs the last 30 years. Not to mention he is one of the top minds of the scheme Bret wanted to switch to and most likely the ultimate reason we made this hire.
I think this is exactly the stance a lot of people are struggling with. This guy wasn’t mentioned once, not by insiders, not by reporters, not by anyone. And now suddenly he’s being presented as a “top mind” for the system we want to run. Based on what? What did any of us know about him ten hours ago? It’s clearly a pivot from our top target, otherwise, there would’ve been no reason to wait until after the Super Bowl. It’s okay to acknowledge that. But acting like we just uncovered some hidden gem feels wrong. He’s never called a defense at any level, yet now we’re supposed to believe he’s a premier defensive mind? I’m not buying that sudden shift.
 
#284      
Warner and Wagner convinced this was the first pick and all the Super Bowl comments were a "smokescreen". That seems like a major reach.
If Bret already had his guy what's the point of putting out fake clues to throw people off the scent?
Were there other schools with DC openings in February clamoring to hire a 61 year old FCS Head Coach?
Not saying this is a bad hire, but that take reeks of copium.
Because he was resigning from his HC spot at Montana... they had to buy some time
 
#287      
Maybe the Cignetti success will fuel a run of oldsters getting hired. It'll feel like 1999 again, with the old Cobol programmers nearing hero status.
 
#288      
I believe those 2 players from montana that received waviers were a LB and OL. I do agree it would make a ton of sense for montana kids to enter the portal (since their hc “left”) but I don’t think I will get my hopes up.
  • Solomon Tuliaupupu (Linebacker): A standout starting linebacker who was granted a waiver for a ninth year of college eligibility.
  • Dylan Jemtegaard (Offensive Lineman): A key backup offensive lineman who also received a waiver to extend his collegiate career through the 2026 season.
 
#289      
So who is recruiting if we have 3-4 guys who are clearly just dead weight on the trail?
Parker, McDaniel, Harris, Hawthorne, McNeal, and possibly the new DL or Safety coach. BB also has more time to recruit now that he doesn't have to help out with the defense as much.
 
#290      
Parker, McDaniel, Harris, Hawthorne, McNeal, and possibly the new DL or Safety coach. BB also has more time to recruit now that he doesn't have to help out with the defense as much.
This is bad tho? Why is our staff so poorly put together that our head coach has to recruit. Wasn’t the very issue with AHen that Bret was forced to be too hands on?
 
#295      
I think this is exactly the stance a lot of people are struggling with. This guy wasn’t mentioned once, not by insiders, not by reporters, not by anyone. And now suddenly he’s being presented as a “top mind” for the system we want to run. Based on what? What did any of us know about him ten hours ago? It’s clearly a pivot from our top target, otherwise, there would’ve been no reason to wait until after the Super Bowl. It’s okay to acknowledge that. But acting like we just uncovered some hidden gem feels wrong. He’s never called a defense at any level, yet now we’re supposed to believe he’s a premier defensive mind? I’m not buying that sudden shift.
Amen. 🙏
 
#296      
If our recruiting efforts now rely on Directors of Offensive Player Personnel instead of our actual coaches, it’s a sign that something in our process is fundamentally broken. We have staff members who will never coach these players taking the lead in recruiting because our current recruiting infrastructure just isn’t getting the job done.
 
#298      
What did any of us know about him ten hours ago?
If you can't comprehensively analyze the career and implications for our program of a coach pulled out of a hat in three google searches do you even post bro?

And now suddenly he’s being presented as a “top mind” for the system we want to run. Based on what?
Montana does in fact run 3-3-5 with a lot of shifting before and after the snap to confuse offensive lines regarding what is coming at them, which is also what Mike MacDonald is doing with Chris Partridge in Seattle out of a somewhat different formation. There is a commonality of theory there. So I'm relatively comfortable that this isn't some 11th hour radical change of plan versus what BB was discussing in the signing day presser. Sacrificing size up front for more speed, more blitzing, and more complexity for offenses to worry about is that NFL trend that Bret is wanting to move towards, and Montana was doing that.

I think the question is whether Bobby Hauck, 61 year old who hasn't worked in P4/5 football since 2002, hasn't worked as a DC ever, and is on record as finding dealing with the modern college football player draining on his enjoyment of coaching, actually the guy to be the leader of a Big Ten defense, is he actually going to flourish as the chess wizard he and BB have conceived as his next act?

I'm reminded less of Tony Petersen than I am of the famous secret summit in Tampa of Josh Whitman and Lovie Smith, two guys who are both top talents in their fields, two immensely qualified people, but who hatched a plan that just was not realistic and which was fated not to survive contact with reality, with a prominent reason being that the coach being hired did not particularly need, like, or want the job he needed to do.

I just don't like the vibe with this one. I understand the theory, it *could* work, but I just have a bad feeling. It feels inconsistent with the principles that have brought Bielema so much success.
 
#299      
William H Macy Fargo GIF by Filmin

  • Dylan Jemtegaard (Offensive Lineman)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back