Illinois #10 in 2/16 AP Poll

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
Right or wrong, the ranking systems do not agree (at least with Purdue on Wisconsin). They have Purdue around 6-8, Nebraska around 8-13 (so that's certainly borderline), and Wisconsin around 25-33

Betting odds to win it all place Purdue around 10, Nebraska around 13, and Wisconsin around 23.
Where are these odds from? I only ask because it sounds like they are more aware and informed (insightful) than the AP poll. Maybe the poll should be replaced by Vegas
 
#77      
Where are these odds from? I only ask because it sounds like they are more aware and informed (insightful) than the AP poll. Maybe the poll should be replaced by Vegas
I got them here:

They probably incorporate some loose assumptions around how teams will be seeded, but other than that I have to believe they're a better predictor of future team ability than anything else. Based on these, if seeding ends up like BracketMatrix has it today, I hope we get UCONN as our 1, and Gonzaga (or Nebraska if allowed) as our 3.
 
#78      
I got them here:

They probably incorporate some loose assumptions around how teams will be seeded, but other than that I have to believe they're a better predictor of future team ability than anything else. Based on these, if seeding ends up like BracketMatrix has it today, I hope we get UCONN as our 1, and Gonzaga (or Nebraska if allowed) as our 3.
The betting lines are a much better indicator than any polls or statistical formulas.
 
#81      
Unfortunately, we should hope they won’t be 1 at that point.

Curious who the board will root for between Duke and Michigan? Tough one for me
I always root against ND first and Michigan second, unless I can justify how it helps the Illini for them to win. Since Duke also registers high on the disdain meter, currently ranked ahead of us, and a MI loss does not impact the BIG standings, I would rather play #1 ranked MI. Therefore, as diificult as it is, Michigan.
 
#82      
Duke. They'll be a 1 regardless playing in the ACC.

If Michigan loses to Purdue and Duke...

IL can jump them with a win.
Agree with the first sentence. Not so sure about the second. Michigan is firmly the number one overall seed right now and it would take a whole lot to move them down 4 spots this late in the year.

In this scenario, would their 11 Q1 wins and four losses to NET #33 Wisconsin, #8 Purdue, #2 Duke, and #4 Illinois be worse than our 9 Q1 wins and five losses to #21 Alabama, #10 UConn, #11 Nebraska, #15 MSU, and #33 Wisconsin?

If they also lose to Minnesota, we might have a chance.
 
#83      
I always root against ND first and Michigan second, unless I can justify how it helps the Illini for them to win. Since Duke also registers high on the disdain meter, currently ranked ahead of us, and a MI loss does not impact the BIG standings, I would rather play #1 ranked MI. Therefore, as diificult as it is, Michigan.
I agree with your order of hatred, therefore will be rooting for Purdue.

A Purdue win does impact the BIG standings though. A Purdue win means we control our fate for a share of the BIG if we win out.
 
#84      
https://www.reddit.com/r/CollegeBasketball/comments/1r796w3/all_ap_voter_ballots_week_16/

1771345806756.png
 
#91      
There's a strong coastal bias that is against us. Particularly from the West Coast. Furthermore, the Michigan writer highlights why no one likes Michigan regardless of sport. They always think they're superior to everyone else within the conference and other folks are just fodder. They therefore misinterpret earned disdain for folks wanting to have a "rivalry" with them.
 
#92      
The betting lines are a much better indicator than any polls or statistical formulas.
Well, yes, they're a better predictor of outcomes. But based on this: https://www.thepredictiontracker.com/bbresults.php, some ranking systems get pretty close (some may even beat the line in a given year, though that isn't stable).

But tournament outcomes aren't the same as ability. They can be influenced by seeding (blue-bloods would get a boost in betting markets if they're expected to get a favorable seed), fan base (teams with fans that travel will give them an advantage), styles of play that are conducive to a championship (i.e. "balanced" teams fare better than extremely offensive/defensive teams), not to mention things like biased officials or fixes.
 
#96      
Agree with the first sentence. Not so sure about the second. Michigan is firmly the number one overall seed right now and it would take a whole lot to move them down 4 spots this late in the year.

In this scenario, would their 11 Q1 wins and four losses to NET #33 Wisconsin, #8 Purdue, #2 Duke, and #4 Illinois be worse than our 9 Q1 wins and five losses to #21 Alabama, #10 UConn, #11 Nebraska, #15 MSU, and #33 Wisconsin?

If they also lose to Minnesota, we might have a chance.
Shouldn't head to head matter? Remember, in 2021 Michigan only had 3 Ls and Illinois had 6 Ls.

Illinois was the #3 overall seed ahead of Michigan.
 
#97      
Shouldn't head to head matter? Remember, in 2021 Michigan only had 3 Ls and Illinois had 6 Ls.

Illinois was the #3 overall seed ahead of Michigan.
I'm not sure if it does or if it should. Maybe it's used as a tie breaker in some instances?

In 2021 Illinois was 12-6 in Q1 and Michigan was 10-4 so I would guess that is probably the main reason why we got the nod for the 3rd 1 seed ahead of Michigan. Although our drubbing of them in Ann Arbor probably didn't hurt.

Mainly though, I just don't think we'll actually get close enough to Michigan's overall body of work for our head to head result to matter. Could be wrong. Hope I am.
 
#100      
All I know is that right now, putting the experts aside, and looking at a single game, not the Natty odds Wisky scares me more than PU or Nebby
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back