Iowa State lost and went up to number 4? Wild!
A game they were never really competitive in. They are such frauds to me. Please put us in their region.Iowa State lost and went up to number 4? Wild!
Have you seen their metrics.....not good.I guarantee you the voters who continue to insist on stiffing Miami (OH) wonder in other contexts why sports isn't as charming and freewheeling as it used to be.
Physician, heal thyself!
Really? They have a NET in the low 40s. If they do not win their tourney, they are likely not even getting selected for the NCAAT. I think the voters are actually giving them massive props with the ranking.I guarantee you the voters who continue to insist on stiffing Miami (OH) wonder in other contexts why sports isn't as charming and freewheeling as it used to be.
Physician, heal thyself!
Have you seen their metrics.....not good.
Here's my fundamental issue.Really? They have a NET in the low 40s. If they do not win their tourney, they are likely not even getting selected for the NCAAT. I think the voters are actually giving them massive props with the ranking.
What they have done this year is great and all, but they are 1-0 against Quad 2 opponents and 23-0 in Q3/Q4 games. They even have 3 games that do not classify on the quad system.
Well if that were the case, then they would not be ranked in either the AP or Coaches poll.Here's my fundamental issue.
If your AP Poll vote is just rehashing what KenPom and the NET already say, what the heck do I need the AP Poll for?
Miami isn't that good, in a way we would have recognized even in 1997 or whatever. But being undefeated this late in the season is narratively interesting, and impressive, and they deserve to be at least around the Top 15 in the AP Poll, because the swingy, vibes-based AP Poll is the part of the system *designed* to recognize what they're doing.
We passed Nebby too!11, I think Gonzaga and Florida pass us and we jump over Kansas
I thought The Discourse (TM) around their schedule was overblown, and then I actually looked at their schedule andHere's my fundamental issue.
If your AP Poll vote is just rehashing what KenPom and the NET already say, what the heck do I need the AP Poll for?
Miami isn't that good, in a way we would have recognized even in 1997 or whatever. But being undefeated this late in the season is narratively interesting, and impressive, and they deserve to be at least around the Top 15 in the AP Poll, because the swingy, vibes-based AP Poll is the part of the system *designed* to recognize what they're doing.
Best coach in the country? Are we kidding lolYou would be correct sir!!! ILL not dropping past 12 even that is too low .... Best offense in the country, with the best damn coach in country!!!
They beat Houston, which is a REALLY good win for them.Iowa State lost and went up to number 4? Wild!
You would be correct sir!!! ILL not dropping past 12 even that is too low .... Best offense in the country, with the best damn coach in country!!!
They are like 84th in KenPom lolWell if that were the case, then they would not be ranked in either the AP or Coaches poll.
I think what we are seeing is that coaches and the general sports writer are seeing that Miami is putting together quite a great season, but their job is to still put together a ranking list of the top teams. I find it hard to find anybody that would logically argue that Miami is one of the top 15 teams in the country. Maybe if they had at least one marquis power conference win, then that would justify a top 15 ranking. Their best win is at home against Akron. Don't get me wrong, going undefeated to this point in a season is impressive. The fact that they are getting ranked 20+ spots higher than their metrics rankings suggest to me that your "vibes-based" ranking system is actually working.
I was trying to be generous by using the NET ranking as the starting pointThey are like 84th in KenPom lol
I don't actually think the AP Poll is designed to weight any specific way of voting over any other way of voting - in fact very much the opposite. It's designed to encompass as many different individual thought processes as possible into the closest approximation of the general zeitgeist. It does this like any other poll - tries to get a representative sample of its defined larger group (in this instance, sports writers and broadcasters who cover college basketball), to represent as close an approximation as possible of the whole. There is definitely a segment of those that cover college basketball that put a lot of stock into KP and Torvik and NET other such metrics, and that segment is also represented in the AP voter base. By design.Here's my fundamental issue.
If your AP Poll vote is just rehashing what KenPom and the NET already say, what the heck do I need the AP Poll for?
Miami isn't that good, in a way we would have recognized even in 1997 or whatever. But being undefeated this late in the season is narratively interesting, and impressive, and they deserve to be at least around the Top 15 in the AP Poll, because the swingy, vibes-based AP Poll is the part of the system *designed* to recognize what they're doing.
but we have the tiebreaker of leading the country in missed dunks!![]()
ILL... 2nd best 6 lost team in the country
Technically, 27 - 0 is a metricHave you seen their metrics.....not good.
Iowa State lost and went up to number 4? Wild!
Technically, 27 - 0 is a metric
Thanks, first time I have seen this graphic. Fun looking for our high and low (6 and 17)