If we pull a 9 of 32 from three, we'll be blown out. We're going to have to have a 17 of 42 type night because the points in the paint are going to be one sided. What makes Tomi and Mirk so valuable is their ability to shoot the three. They are matchup problems because of it. Michigan creates matchup problems because they are extremely athletic, big and physical. Conversely, that's a matchup problem for us. So no, if we don't take advantage of the one part of our game that could potentially cause them headaches(hitting threes) we'll be in a world of trouble.This has been pointed out a bunch of times, but 5 of the 6 games Michigan has played that were very close (< 5 points) their opponent shot poorly from 3
So its just pure fallacy that we have to make a bunch of 3s to compete here… since mid December we’ve been the better team anyway (even with our 2nd most important player missing half of the games).
Are they going to have an issue with our height? I suppose it could happen. Are we going to have issues with their athleticism and physicality? Yes. That's just the roster we have.
Against UCLA, we got out to a big lead because we hit threes and we coughed up a 23 point lead because we didn't. That game vs UCLA was the epitome of living and dying by the three.
They've lost, what, two games in that time period with one being to Duke? They may not have been sharp a couple of times, but they've also had a 18-20 point lead @ Purdue and a 17-18 point lead @ MSU. They've gotten at least a share of the Big Ten Championship with three full games to go.
I'm not trying to come across that we shouldn't have hope because we do have an avenue to get a W. That said, our margin for error is significantly less than theirs.
If we can hold our own on the glass and if we can win with 15 or less threes......get the crow nice and cooked up because I'll eat the whole darn thing HAPPILY.