Pregame: Illinois at Maryland, Sunday, March 8th, 2:00pm CT, FOX

Status
Not open for further replies.
#26      
Just have to get this one done. Not only would a loss probably bump us down a seed line in the NCAAT but it would also probably bump us out of a triple bye. Would love to have this be our only game in a 10-11 day span or whatever it would be. Think it would do wonders for our legs, defense and shooting.

Last game of the season so anything can happen, but as long as we don’t sleepwalk we should be fine. I feel like the only game we really took our foot off the gas/imploded was @UCLA and even then they had to have an insanely good run of shooting (18 for 20 at some point I think?) as well as a few other fluky things to beat us on a buzzer beater in OT.
 
#27      
Time to deliver another butt-whoopin'

Angry Loki GIF
 
#33      
Z has definitely gotten stronger this year. He has gained some serious weight too. Both of these guys could make a HUGE difference for us in the tournament. I don't know what it is but I feel for some reason that they will both turn it around when we face elimination. I hope I am right. These guys have played in these tournaments and they get it.
 
#34      
Maryland fans can take heart. Buzz Williams first season at Virginia Tech they went 11-22.

He’s a good enough coach to get their program turned around.
 
#36      
When I watch Z shoot it from 3 I just cringe. Tomi has a nice release and form that looks like it has a reasonable chance to go in. Zs shot looks like he should pass it to someone else
Meh. Tomi shoots flat and Z shoots a rainbow. Neither look great. They are 7 feet tall and should stop taking 5+ threes a game
 
#38      
The lob to z can be a cheat code too.
Andrej yeeting the ball at him yesterday for an and one alley oop made me laugh so hard.
When I watch Z shoot it from 3 I just cringe. Tomi has a nice release and form that looks like it has a reasonable chance to go in. Zs shot looks like he should pass it to someone else
Yeah he get insane arc on his shots. Which isnt bad but given his height they look like circus shots.
 
#39      
When I watch Z shoot it from 3 I just cringe. Tomi has a nice release and form that looks like it has a reasonable chance to go in. Zs shot looks like he should pass it to someone else
Yeah he get insane arc on his shots. Which isnt bad but given his height they look like circus shots.
He shot 37% from 3 over the last two years. No idea what has him shooting 31% this year.
 
#40      
Speaking of three shooting percentages. This is purely anecdotal with no research into percentages, but it seems like for some reason Illini teams throughout the years struggle from three in Assembly Hall/State Farm Center while visiting teams seem to have no problem catching fire from three. Probably just a weird perceptional bias on my part but it seems like that is what I have observed over the years.

Edit: Notwithstanding Oregon last night, who was brutal from three. And I can remember others too.
 
Last edited:
#43      
I am going to be blunt here: This should be and needs to be a basketball snuff film. Don’t play with your food. Show up, play hard, and take of business. That’s it.
 
#44      
Andrej and Big Z thrive against inferior competition. I expect both of them to have good games to finish the year. But when it matters most, they seem to turtle in my opinion. Last play of UCLA is a prime example. Also the entire game against Michigan they were no where to be found. As vets on the team, I really hope they can lock in down the stretch but I think past performance indicative of future performance for each one.
 
#46      
He shot 37% from 3 over the last two years. No idea what has him shooting 31% this year.
I do think there is some merit to the Fletch affect affecting shooting for SOME players
 
#47      
People can crunch numbers and stats until their eyes fall out, but that only tells part of the story ... and believe me, that means a lot coming from a guy who is all about analytics and even deals with that stuff for my career! But for me, this squad's Big Ten games have fit fairly neatly into three (quite subjective!!) categories. Keep in mind, we can have varying performance levels within each category (e.g., we played objectively better at USC compared to at Ohio State, but they both had that "we came to play" vibe). Using current NET Rankings for context.

Tier 1 | Illini showed up with energy, looked like a well-prepared team, performed like a well-oiled machine and rightfully had fans dreaming of a potential Final Four (or beyond!) run.

Dec. 9 - W 88-80 at #34 Ohio State
Jan. 8 - W 81-55 vs. Rutgers
Jan. 11 - W 75-69 at Iowa
Jan. 24 - W 88-82 at Purdue
Feb. 1 - W 78-69 at #12 Nebraska
Feb. 4 - W 84-44 vs. Northwestern
Feb. 7 - L 82-85 in OT at Michigan State
Feb. 15 - W 71-51 vs. Indiana
Feb. 18 - W 101-65 at USC
March 3 - W 80-54 vs. Oregon


Tier 2 | Illini still looked like a solid team, but issues that haunted us last year reared their ugly heads at times (e.g., defensive breakdowns, inconsistent effort, not getting to the hoop when the threes weren't falling, etc.). Still, most fans

Dec. 13 - L 80-83 vs. #12 Nebraska*
Jan. 3 - W 73-65 at #124 Penn State
Jan. 14 - W 79-68 at Northwestern
Jan. 17 - W 77-67 vs. Minnesota
Jan. 29 - W 75-66 vs. Washington
Feb. 10 - L 90-92 in OT vs. Wisconsin


Tier 3 | Illini showed WAY too much of the issues we had last year and rightfully had fans worrying that we would be especially susceptible to an early exit in March Madness.

Feb. 21 - L 94-95 in OT at UCLA**
Feb. 27 - L 70-84 vs. Michigan***


The TL;DR here is that anything above a Tier 3 effort in College Park should have the Illini coming away with a win that was never truly in doubt. We have a lot to play for, and the boys better realize that ... our performance vs. Oregon gives me confidence that they're once again locked in. Let's hope we look back at the February 21 to February 27 stretch as nothing more than a mini-slump that served as a nice kick in the rear! Only steps forward, NO steps back! Keep up the momentum from the Oregon win and keep building on it. We need confidence and momentum heading into the BTT and NCAAs, and smacking a bad Maryland team at their place would be great for that!!

* The first Nebraska matchup was arguably half Tier 3 and half Tier 1, lol ... so I split the difference.
** The beginning of the UCLA game was unambiguously Tier 1, and we did keep our composure and kept fighting toward the very end at least at a Tier 2 level. Also, I do think UCLA is a good team, so there is no shame in the loss in and of itself or "on paper." However, blowing a 20-point lead and playing that bad of defense when we needed a stop for the win shifts the overall product to Tier 3 for me.
*** I'll probably take heat for this one given how elite Michigan looks, but come on ... the intangibles in this effort were just such trash. We looked TRULY soft and more of a "mess" than any other time since our UConn loss, if you ask me.
 
#48      
People can crunch numbers and stats until their eyes fall out, but that only tells part of the story ... and believe me, that means a lot coming from a guy who is all about analytics and even deals with that stuff for my career! But for me, this squad's Big Ten games have fit fairly neatly into three (quite subjective!!) categories. Keep in mind, we can have varying performance levels within each category (e.g., we played objectively better at USC compared to at Ohio State, but they both had that "we came to play" vibe). Using current NET Rankings for context.

Tier 1 | Illini showed up with energy, looked like a well-prepared team, performed like a well-oiled machine and rightfully had fans dreaming of a potential Final Four (or beyond!) run.

Dec. 9 - W 88-80 at #34 Ohio State
Jan. 8 - W 81-55 vs. Rutgers
Jan. 11 - W 75-69 at Iowa
Jan. 24 - W 88-82 at Purdue
Feb. 1 - W 78-69 at #12 Nebraska
Feb. 4 - W 84-44 vs. Northwestern
Feb. 7 - L 82-85 in OT at Michigan State
Feb. 15 - W 71-51 vs. Indiana
Feb. 18 - W 101-65 at USC
March 3 - W 80-54 vs. Oregon


Tier 2 | Illini still looked like a solid team, but issues that haunted us last year reared their ugly heads at times (e.g., defensive breakdowns, inconsistent effort, not getting to the hoop when the threes weren't falling, etc.). Still, most fans

Dec. 13 - L 80-83 vs. #12 Nebraska*
Jan. 3 - W 73-65 at #124 Penn State
Jan. 14 - W 79-68 at Northwestern
Jan. 17 - W 77-67 vs. Minnesota
Jan. 29 - W 75-66 vs. Washington
Feb. 10 - L 90-92 in OT vs. Wisconsin


Tier 3 | Illini showed WAY too much of the issues we had last year and rightfully had fans worrying that we would be especially susceptible to an early exit in March Madness.

Feb. 21 - L 94-95 in OT at UCLA**
Feb. 27 - L 70-84 vs. Michigan***


The TL;DR here is that anything above a Tier 3 effort in College Park should have the Illini coming away with a win that was never truly in doubt. We have a lot to play for, and the boys better realize that ... our performance vs. Oregon gives me confidence that they're once again locked in. Let's hope we look back at the February 21 to February 27 stretch as nothing more than a mini-slump that served as a nice kick in the rear! Only steps forward, NO steps back! Keep up the momentum from the Oregon win and keep building on it. We need confidence and momentum heading into the BTT and NCAAs, and smacking a bad Maryland team at their place would be great for that!!

* The first Nebraska matchup was arguably half Tier 3 and half Tier 1, lol ... so I split the difference.
** The beginning of the UCLA game was unambiguously Tier 1, and we did keep our composure and kept fighting toward the very end at least at a Tier 2 level. Also, I do think UCLA is a good team, so there is no shame in the loss in and of itself or "on paper." However, blowing a 20-point lead and playing that bad of defense when we needed a stop for the win shifts the overall product to Tier 3 for me.
*** I'll probably take heat for this one given how elite Michigan looks, but come on ... the intangibles in this effort were just such trash. We looked TRULY soft and more of a "mess" than any other time since our UConn loss, if you ask me.
Lol, forgot the NET Rankings and the time expired...
 
#49      
Andrej yeeting the ball at him yesterday for an and one alley oop made me laugh so hard.

Yeah he get insane arc on his shots. Which isnt bad but given his height they look like circus shots.
Yeeting?!?!?
 
#50      
People can crunch numbers and stats until their eyes fall out, but that only tells part of the story ... and believe me, that means a lot coming from a guy who is all about analytics and even deals with that stuff for my career! But for me, this squad's Big Ten games have fit fairly neatly into three (quite subjective!!) categories. Keep in mind, we can have varying performance levels within each category (e.g., we played objectively better at USC compared to at Ohio State, but they both had that "we came to play" vibe). Using current NET Rankings for context.

Tier 1 | Illini showed up with energy, looked like a well-prepared team, performed like a well-oiled machine and rightfully had fans dreaming of a potential Final Four (or beyond!) run.

Dec. 9 - W 88-80 at #34 Ohio State
Jan. 8 - W 81-55 vs. Rutgers
Jan. 11 - W 75-69 at Iowa
Jan. 24 - W 88-82 at Purdue
Feb. 1 - W 78-69 at #12 Nebraska
Feb. 4 - W 84-44 vs. Northwestern
Feb. 7 - L 82-85 in OT at Michigan State
Feb. 15 - W 71-51 vs. Indiana
Feb. 18 - W 101-65 at USC
March 3 - W 80-54 vs. Oregon


Tier 2 | Illini still looked like a solid team, but issues that haunted us last year reared their ugly heads at times (e.g., defensive breakdowns, inconsistent effort, not getting to the hoop when the threes weren't falling, etc.). Still, most fans

Dec. 13 - L 80-83 vs. #12 Nebraska*
Jan. 3 - W 73-65 at #124 Penn State
Jan. 14 - W 79-68 at Northwestern
Jan. 17 - W 77-67 vs. Minnesota
Jan. 29 - W 75-66 vs. Washington
Feb. 10 - L 90-92 in OT vs. Wisconsin


Tier 3 | Illini showed WAY too much of the issues we had last year and rightfully had fans worrying that we would be especially susceptible to an early exit in March Madness.

Feb. 21 - L 94-95 in OT at UCLA**
Feb. 27 - L 70-84 vs. Michigan***


The TL;DR here is that anything above a Tier 3 effort in College Park should have the Illini coming away with a win that was never truly in doubt. We have a lot to play for, and the boys better realize that ... our performance vs. Oregon gives me confidence that they're once again locked in. Let's hope we look back at the February 21 to February 27 stretch as nothing more than a mini-slump that served as a nice kick in the rear! Only steps forward, NO steps back! Keep up the momentum from the Oregon win and keep building on it. We need confidence and momentum heading into the BTT and NCAAs, and smacking a bad Maryland team at their place would be great for that!!

* The first Nebraska matchup was arguably half Tier 3 and half Tier 1, lol ... so I split the difference.
** The beginning of the UCLA game was unambiguously Tier 1, and we did keep our composure and kept fighting toward the very end at least at a Tier 2 level. Also, I do think UCLA is a good team, so there is no shame in the loss in and of itself or "on paper." However, blowing a 20-point lead and playing that bad of defense when we needed a stop for the win shifts the overall product to Tier 3 for me.
*** I'll probably take heat for this one given how elite Michigan looks, but come on ... the intangibles in this effort were just such trash. We looked TRULY soft and more of a "mess" than any other time since our UConn loss, if you ask me.
Mostly agree with this analysis and I agree on Michigan. They are better than us and probably beat us 7 out of 10 times on a neutral, probably 6 out of 10 times at SFC, but our effort was poor. LaTulip said he thought we played timid and I agree. I actually think we had a similar level of timidity vs Purdue, at least in the first half, we just had a nuclear Keaton to save us that game.

Concerning that our two worst efforts have come in 2 of our last 3 games but as I said in the Oregon post game thread, I’m chalking a lot of it up to physical and mental fatigue due to being in the dog days of a long season + we had to play short handed for an extended period of time.

Poor shooting, defensive mistakes, lapses in intensity all can be attributed to fatigue. And as I also said in the post game, we aren’t the only ones going through it. Lots of teams are playing down to their competition and/or losing games they shouldn’t including several last night. And on some level those two losses are at least excusable/explainable in that one was the back end of a long road trip which literally no one has swept against a tourney team who has only lost once at home and presents some individual matchup problems for us, and the other against an absolute wagon/one seed. Not like we got blitzed at home by Cincinnati or even lost on the road to Ohio State.

That’s why I’m optimistic we can regain our form. We will only have one game in the next 9 or 10 days depending on if we earn a triple bye (which we likely will). Think we can get our legs back and solidify what we want to do defensively for the post season.

Now if we come out with another tier 3 type effort in our first BTT game like last year when we got smoked by Maryland, I will be concerned that we peaked too early and won’t bring our best ball to the big dance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back