Illinois 78, Maryland 72 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#351      
Their record is lousy but we have decades of experience losing at MD to overcome when we go there.
We're just jinxed there for some reason
. . . and they came out "guns a blazing," so to speak. All game they kept their intensity, especially on the offensive end.

The way they played yesterday at College park? I truly believe it'd be a close game if the opponents were Wisky, MSU, PU and Nebby.

And versus the likes of Iowa, Indy and possibly UCLA, they might have won.
 
#353      
They don’t understand spending more than #21 on Michigan was going to make by a significant amount of $$ on a super inconsistent AS and a PG in Petro who isn’t even good enough to play …
Maybe I missed this, but I always thought there was a deal in place and he #21 chose to leave. Did UI have a chance to keep #21 if NIL was matched? Also, if they could have looked into the future and see KW would be a lottery pick, would that have changed any of the decisions made regarding #21 or did emotions get in the way and there was no way he would be back unless BU was overruled.
 
#354      
At this point, we might as well just enjoy the last two games of the season and then get back to the drawing board. Once again, we have an elite offense paired with one of the worst defenses. Hopefully Brad actually recruits some players who can defend, because it seems like he has prioritized offensive skill while overlooking defensive ability.
Still #26 in defensive efficiency. Good for 4th in the big ten, so certainly not “one of the worst defenses.”
The toughest part right now is that our go‑to guys in these high‑pressure moments are freshmen. You just don’t win in March relying heavily on freshmen—historically, the only team that has really pulled that off was Kentucky with Anthony Davis. That’s why the “get old and stay old” approach is so important. To win in March, you need experienced veterans who can close games.

I was hoping Andrej and Bos would fill that role, but after the first few games of the season, Bos has really taken a downturn. Andrej is incredibly inconsistent from game to game. Tomi seems like he’s already mentally checked out and may be preparing to either transfer or go back home.

Relying on Mirk and Keaton in big March moments isn’t ideal—and honestly, it’s not fair to them either. I was worried that Bos’ hand injury would affect his shooting, and it has made his three‑point shooting even worse than before.

At this point, we might as well just enjoy the last two games of the season and then get back to the drawing board. Once again, we have an elite offense paired with one of the worst defenses. Hopefully Brad actually recruits some players who can defend, because it seems like he has prioritized offensive skill while overlooking defensive ability.
The brainrot is absurd. This comment literally sounds like the context of a bubble team.
 
#355      
I’m honestly just confused about who these people would rather want to be?

If winning a close game @Maryland — game we controlled for pretty much the entirety of 2H — is giving you such fits… despite being a projected 2seed, 15-5 in B10… I mean:

Michigan State — lost to Minnesota, was in a WAY more dicey position against Rutgers than we were in this game.

UConn — Quad 3 loss to Creighton. Also just wrapped up a loss to a terrible MARQ team.

Purdue — has looked terrible as of late (oh, and btw they’re 39th in defensive efficiency)

Even Michigan was a 3pt shot away from losing to Penn State.
 
#356      
Maryland’s Torvik game score of 92 was their 3rd highest all season

Maryland’s average game score? 55

For reference to Maryland's game score of 92, average game scores this season:

Michigan 96.0
Arizona 95.7
Duke 95.2
Houston 94.3
UConn 90.9
Florida 90.8
Purdue 89.6
Iowa St 89.3
 
#357      
The toughest part right now is that our go‑to guys in these high‑pressure moments are freshmen. You just don’t win in March relying heavily on freshmen—historically, the only team that has really pulled that off was Kentucky with Anthony Davis. That’s why the “get old and stay old” approach is so important. To win in March, you need experienced veterans who can close games.

I was hoping Andrej and Bos would fill that role, but after the first few games of the season, Bos has really taken a downturn. Andrej is incredibly inconsistent from game to game. Tomi seems like he’s already mentally checked out and may be preparing to either transfer or go back home.

Relying on Mirk and Keaton in big March moments isn’t ideal—and honestly, it’s not fair to them either. I was worried that Bos’ hand injury would affect his shooting, and it has made his three‑point shooting even worse than before.

At this point, we might as well just enjoy the last two games of the season and then get back to the drawing board. Once again, we have an elite offense paired with one of the worst defenses. Hopefully Brad actually recruits some players who can defend, because it seems like he has prioritized offensive skill while overlooking defensive ability.
Saying “we might as well enjoy the last two games of the season and then go back to the drawing board” literally means you’re implying we lose out 😂
 
#359      
I’m honestly just confused about who these people would rather want to be?

If winning a close game @Maryland — game we controlled for pretty much the entirety of 2H — is giving you such fits… despite being a projected 2seed, 15-5 in B10… I mean:

Michigan State — lost to Minnesota, was in a WAY more dicey position against Rutgers than we were in this game.

UConn — Quad 3 loss to Creighton. Also just wrapped up a loss to a terrible MARQ team.

Purdue — has looked terrible as of late (oh, and btw they’re 39th in defensive efficiency)

Even Michigan was a 3pt shot away from losing to Penn State.
Also had to come back from double digits to beat Northwestern.
 
#360      
Close games aren't just limited to overtime games... if we're only looking at overtime games then we're missing a ton of necessary context
I agree here about overtime emphasis. I would think over a longer period of time the overtime results even out.
 
#364      
It’s not monopoly money, but at the end of the day anyone who wants to try being a donor should have some understanding of the reality of the situation, which is there is only so much control you can realistically expect to have when it comes to 18-24 year olds on a college sports team. There are so many different variables and decisions they are going to make over the course of their months or years on campus that will affect how their on-court success pans out. It is probably not healthy to expect a certain level of control or outcome on a team’s coaches and players, who have more options than ever with the transfer portal, nil, etc. Of course anyone wants a good return on their investment and so there should be consequences when large amounts of money are obviously mismanaged or squandered.

Here is a pretty good indicator imo on whether Brad and his group are having a good ROI for their season.

View attachment 48122

If Brad is consistently getting to this level, I don’t really know how much more can be done to affect the coaches, players, and team as a whole. Losing the Morez’s and seeing the Podziemski’s blow up the next semester after they transfer is annoying, and maybe there are some adjustments and things the coaches could learn about roster retention to achieve a top tier roster. But again 18-24 year old athletes in the age of portal/nil will make unpredictable decisions.
T know this is speculation. Knowing what we know about Wagler and the addition of Mirk, put Morez in the mix and this team might be a top 2 favorite for the title.
 
#365      
Scoreboard for Fly Illini Fly and classic Indy throwing stuff against the wall

Since I’m just “throwing stuff against the wall” …

Here’s our recent results over the last month from 3 … Like I said … Just keep chucking … Have to find a better and make a quicker adjustment when threes aren’t falling …

5-24 (21%) Maryland
10-36 (28%) Oregon
9-29 (31%) Michigan
13-42 (31%) UCLA
13-29 (45%) USC … Great !!
7-31 (23%) Indiana
15-33 (45%) Wisco … Great !!
10-36 (28%) MSU
 
#366      
Since I’m just “throwing stuff against the wall” …

Here’s our recent results over the last month from 3 … Like I said … Just keep chucking … Have to find a better and make a quicker adjustment when threes aren’t falling …

5-24 (21%) Maryland
10-36 (28%) Oregon
9-29 (31%) Michigan
13-42 (31%) UCLA
13-29 (45%) USC … Great !!
7-31 (23%) Indiana
15-33 (45%) Wisco … Great !!
10-36 (28%) MSU
I was at least happy to see we only took 24 threes against Maryland given the advantage we had inside - last year we would have still put up 30+ threes and lost.

We do need to work out of our funk on threes and they can be contagious, both good and bad. Part of the solution, IMHO is who is taking them. We really need to stop the Kylan dribble threes, Z shouldn't take them period and Andre only if it's a wide open catch and shoot. We need to get Keaton more catch and shoot threes. Have him be the screener up top and pop, or drive to his side when Kylan has the ball to draw the defenders. He's our best three point shooter, drawing up some actions for him can only help.

If it's Keaton, Mirk, Davis, Ben taking most of our threes the % will go up
 
#367      
Since I’m just “throwing stuff against the wall” …

Here’s our recent results over the last month from 3 … Like I said … Just keep chucking … Have to find a better and make a quicker adjustment when threes aren’t falling …

5-24 (21%) Maryland
10-36 (28%) Oregon
9-29 (31%) Michigan
13-42 (31%) UCLA
13-29 (45%) USC … Great !!
7-31 (23%) Indiana
15-33 (45%) Wisco … Great !!
10-36 (28%) MSU

Doesn’t only taking 24 3’s imply that we did make a quick adjustment? I mean, the entire 2nd half was get to the paint. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong but 8 3PAs in the entire 2nd half has got to be the lowest all year by a wide margin.

Seems to me they definitely went away from “just keep chucking”, especially compared to last years team.
 
#368      
I get Brad rightfully being ticked at the close game comment.

We've won tons of close games.
The Maryland win at 6 points was our 2nd closest win of the year (4 points) and closest win since November 11th.

A wouldn’t call one win all season by less than 6 points “winning a ton of close games”.
 
#369      
Maryland played their 3rd best game all season.
We played our 2nd worst.

We still won.

Season 5 Episode 20 GIF by The Simpsons
 
#370      
Doesn’t only taking 24 3’s imply that we did make a quick adjustment? I mean, the entire 2nd half was get to the paint. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong but 8 3PAs in the entire 2nd half has got to be the lowest all year by a wide margin.

Seems to me they definitely went away from “just keep chucking”, especially compared to last years team.
I was pretty happy they made the emphasis on going inside. mirk was killing them! our offense has rarely been the issue all year outside of uconn and Michigan. I was just concerned about the lack of defense. I'm going to hope it was sickness related and maybe little rest and reset cures it. we do need tomi to get out of his funk.
 
#371      
I'm still in shock a B10 ref though actually correctly called in real time a leg kickout foul on a 3pt shot on the shooter instead of calling a close out foul on Mirk. I didn't think B10 refs capable of getting that type of call correct.
The ref that called it had an imperfect angle to see it too. Gotta give credit when it's due, that's excellent refereeing.
 
#372      

Guessing AI wrote the Illinois blurb in the B1G bracket reveal article. Everything about it is wrong.
I really only see one mistake from that blurb, but it's a fairly big flub:

"Illinois (24-7, 15-5 Big Ten) secured the No. 4 seed after posting 15 conference wins to tie the 2022 Illinois squad for second most league wins in program history, one shy of the team mark set in 2021. It’s 24 wins are also the most during the regular season in program history."

It's right about our 15 conference wins being tied for 2nd most conference wins in school history since we had 16 conference wins in the 2020-2021 season. But the 2004-2005 team went 29-1 in the regular season(damned Ohio State game-winning 3 in the last game of the regular season still makes me angry when I think about it lol), so I have no idea why that article thinks that. Even if 24 was the program record for most wins in the regular season, welp, we won 24 games in the regular season in 2020-2021 as well. I think you're right about it being AI-written, especially because there's no human author credited with writing it and a human author is ALWAYS credited for writing an article.

The B10 might wanna stop dabbling in a technology that's not only CLEARLY nowhere near ready in terms of being 100% accurate, but also takes away jobs/pay from human authors.
 
#373      
I really only see one mistake from that blurb, but it's a fairly big flub:

"Illinois (24-7, 15-5 Big Ten) secured the No. 4 seed after posting 15 conference wins to tie the 2022 Illinois squad for second most league wins in program history, one shy of the team mark set in 2021. It’s 24 wins are also the most during the regular season in program history."

It's right about our 15 conference wins being tied for 2nd most conference wins in school history since we had 16 conference wins in the 2020-2021 season. But the 2004-2005 team went 29-1 in the regular season(damned Ohio State game-winning 3 in the last game of the regular season still makes me angry when I think about it lol), so I have no idea why that article thinks that. Even if 24 was the program record for most wins in the regular season, welp, we won 24 games in the regular season in 2020-2021 as well. I think you're right about it being AI-written, especially because there's no human author credited with writing it and a human author is ALWAYS credited for writing an article.

The B10 might wanna stop dabbling in a technology that's not only CLEARLY nowhere near ready in terms of being 100% accurate, but also takes away jobs/pay from human authors.
AI also needs a refresher course in grammar. The last sentence should be “Its 24 games…” not It’s. That is only used as a contraction for “it is”. It is not possessive. Yes, I am a grammar nerd. Actually, this may be why it may not have been written by AI. I think AI generally knows correct grammar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back