And if Siena had upset Duke, I'll always wonder what that % would have been. Nice stat you found.0.3% of ESPN brackets have lost their champion after 1 game.
You what that say:
“If you can’t beat ‘em, be them.”
Or something like that.
Odds for a S16 look really good for us. The Loyola year, I believe we were only about 65% according to Torvik (that wasn't as big an upset as everyone thought it).Here's my last iteration of probabilities derived from FanDuel futures (odds taken from just before the first game).
Changes I notice:
- our odds improved slightly up through reaching the NC Game, but dipped for winning it all
- Arizona and Michigan are pulling away from Duke and (especially) Florida
- Michigan St's odds improved some, and so did Vandy's (but not as much)
Edit: my two brackets in the Loyalty Challenge used last nights' odds to randomly pick winners for each game, except with Illinois winning it all
View attachment 48427
Then again, I felt really good about VCU and St. Mary's so maybe don't listen to anything I say.UNI is my dark horse.
Anytime I look at these 12, 13, 14 seed upsets, I already know the higher seed is going to have better overall metrics. What I look for is the one or two things stylistically that the underdog does well that the favorite has struggled with a little bit. And from there I just use my imagination lol.
For UNI, since Feb 1, they've been 14th in 3p% and 11th in 2p%. St. John's D has been pretty stout during that time but for me, it's about whether I can visualize UNI stretching the floor and getting hot from three and I think they've shown they can do that.
Defensively, UNI gives up a lot of threes. Not a problem because St. John's is 303rd in 3p rate and 338 in 3p% since Feb 1.
And then tempo. This is the big one. Can UNI control the tempo? They are one of the slowest tempo teams in the country and St. John's is one of the faster tempos in the country. How will St. John's respond if UNI grinds the game to a halt, takes care of the ball, and executes enough to get open threes?
Mine was not perfect after one gameI predict no one's bracket will be perfect after the first two rounds.
Same, lol. I made three brackets due to the groups I was in, and I didn’t even consider OSU losing to TCU in any of them.Mine was not perfect after one game
Wow. No wonder UNC lost. Davis is not the brightest light on the tree.
There are 8 perfect brackets in the big CBS challenge after round 1. There were no perfect brackets in the Loyalty bracket that I'm running after day 1. One person did get everything except Wisconsin/HighPoint right.I predict no one's bracket will be perfect after the first two rounds.
I get the whole needing to rebuild part but it's wild to me that Darian wouldn't want to coach Tucker for a few more games and potentially go out with a win(either in the Crown or NIT).Not to stick up for Indiana basketball, and I do feel like they should have accepted a post season tournament invitation, but the situations were slightly different.
Nebraska had the core of their team returning. Whereas Indiana loses Wilkerson, Devries, Conerway, Alexis, Bailey, and Enright, which is 5 of their top 6 in minutes. So they have a full rebuild in front of them. Probably figure time is better spent getting started on the portal than practicing with a group of guys that won’t be around next year.
How does this get calculated?
Your stats are false, fake, and fraud.How does this get calculated?
Illinois on the season has scored 2700 points
1984 field goal attempts
422 offensive rebounds
284 turnovers
653 FT attempts
That should have us at 125.2 not 126.1
Guess who’s got SLU over scUM in the second round!!????
![]()
(I’m hypothetical John Krazinski in this instance)