Illinois 65, Houston 55 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#451      
IMG_6334.jpeg
 
#458      
The adoration in Brad’s eyes 😂
Yeah…you can’t fake that. These guys are a legit group that enjoy each other. It’s so refreshing…

Compare that to the narrowly averted mutiny of 2022-23 for comparison.

That’s one reason I get so annoyed by all the Andrej Stojakovic is a: prima donna, only out for himself and the biggest bag.

Okay he’s a bit of a black hole on O sometimes…but certainly not even close to Kaspar or Mayer.

But gimme a break…

Mayer didn’t even try to run the offense?! I dont remember them getting called out for it by the board anything close to as much as AS.
He’s not half the He$$isn Mayer or Kaspar were. (Look how long of a leash they got too.) He’s more about “team” than either one of those guys. It’s obvious.
 
#459      
Enjoy Chris Walker, the H-Town clown who said we had ‘ZEEE-RO’ chance to beat Houston in Houston breathing pure copium:
There is a nugget of truth there, but it's not that Houston just had back luck in not hitting shots (it was no more of an off night for them than us), it's that they settled for a lot of low-percentage looks, especially in the middle part of the game.

Both teams were constantly in the position of having their initial actions stymied by the opposing defense, and we just did a much, much better job of being patient and creative in those situations. That was the difference in the game.
 
#464      
There is a nugget of truth there, but it's not that Houston just had back luck in not hitting shots (it was no more of an off night for them than us), it's that they settled for a lot of low-percentage looks, especially in the middle part of the game.

Both teams were constantly in the position of having their initial actions stymied by the opposing defense, and we just did a much, much better job of being patient and creative in those situations. That was the difference in the game.
A lot of people knee-jerk hate on analytics but this game was such a great example of using analytics to craft a winning game plan. Our goal was to make them settle for lower percentage looks inside the 3 point arc and we succeeded.

Our goal on offense was not to settle for those looks even when it meant having to reset multiple times in one possession. And to a degree that surprised me, we eventually ended up with good looks most of the time, even when they didn't go in.

It was a great sign when Cenac kept taking those mid-range baseline twos. Even if he's typically a better shooter than that, you keep letting him have those. If you're getting layups and good looks at 3 and they're shooting mid-range jumpers, you're going to win 9/10.
 
#468      
We're not going to be able to hold the NBA off that long
agree

I’ll reluctantly accept one more year . if his personality is what it appears to be & things continue to gel on the court , he could make a ton of real NIL money in the metro Chicago market . maybe even enough to get him for a third year .

he is so likable (as is Wagler also) , that if an agent can monetize it, big $$ awaits him .

see Cutlets, Tommy
 
#470      
We're not going to be able to hold the NBA off that long
If he's going to get drafted I'll allow it.

I honestly have no idea when the NBA is going to come calling though. I'm honestly surprised he's not on draft boards now. It's gotta be the foot speed, right? I'm not sure that's going to get better. Or it could just be he needs to get away from this year's loaded draft class and he'll be a surefire lottery pick next year.
 
#474      
This +100! They earned it. And now, BU, staff and players deserve every accolade they get.

Season is not finished, though! Let's not underestimate Iowa and bury them.
Let's not underestimate Iowa and gut out a tough game for the W. (fify) Iowa is playing much better now than they were in January. This is a trap game that will require the Illini's best effort.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back