RabidDawgClassic
- Los Angeles, CA
Replace “Scheyer” with “Underwood” and I’d swear these posts were from the Loyalty board two weeks ago. 
Who’s gonna call their dad?
I've said this a million times when our fans our fans meltdown for EVERY game. Thd fingers are always pointed somewhere. The coach, the refs, the waterboy......Replace “Scheyer” with “Underwood” and I’d swear these posts were from the Loyalty board two weeks ago.
View attachment 49039View attachment 49040View attachment 49041View attachment 49042View attachment 49043View attachment 49044
Sounds like he may be a small baby.jon root is a big baby
I too don’t understand the people who are killing Boozer. It’s a casual, coach-fan perspective.How is the boozer play dumb? Two wide open teammates. UConn didn’t have anybody past half court.
If he just held it… well, there’s still 6 seconds left with two guys beating down on you for the ball.
The Clarke play is a different story. Don’t know what he was thinking.
He didn't need to pass it all. Duke got the ball with 10 seconds left. There wasn't even the possibility of a 10 second call. All he had to do was hold it and get fouled.I too don’t understand the people who are killing Boozer. It’s a casual, coach-fan perspective.
He catches it at 7 seconds and there’s two UConn players immediately coming at him. In a trap situation at the end of game - when there’s two guys on you, you need to pass the ball. That’s kindergarten basketball. If you don’t, they’ll look to take your ball.
The problem, IMO, is that his teammates were so far back which made the pass too tough. A lot of it is bad luck.
Because they were up two.How is the boozer play dumb? Two wide open teammates. UConn didn’t have anybody past half court.
If he just held it… well, there’s still 6 seconds left with two guys beating down on you for the ball.
The Clarke play is a different story. Don’t know what he was thinking.
Huh, and here I was agreeing with him all the time.jon root is a big baby
Which one is calling dad?
Here’s what Boozer sees:He didn't need to pass it all. Duke got the ball with 10 seconds left. There wasn't even the possibility of a 10 second call. All he had to do was hold it and get fouled.
There isn’t a 5 second call in the backcourt so yeah they really messed it up.Why are people saying Boozer made a major bonehead play, he didn't even need to cross halfcourt? The ball was inbounds with 10 seconds left. Ok cool call a 10 second violation, UConn gets the ball with 0 seconds left. Now it's possible they could have called a 5 second if he just held it there. But that would have been 5 seconds UConn had to swarm him and not foul. He could have held it for 4 or even 3 seconds and then thrown a bad pass and UConn wouldn't have had time. He could have made pass fake to get the defense to move than made a simple pass. He could have just dribbled the ball, he had room. And again, he could have just bent over and covered the ball up.
He panicked and made the worst possible decision. He jumped and threw into 2 guys. Yes Duke did have 2 guys open deep, he threw to the one that made the pass much more difficult than the guy who basically had a half of the court to himself. That said, Evans I think should have come up to get the ball.
So yes, he did everything wrong. He wasn't under control, he didn't seem to know the situation, he left his feet, and he didn't make a good pass. He had a timeout left too.
There is no 5 second violation in the back court.Now it's possible they could have called a 5 second if he just held it there. But that would have been 5 seconds UConn had to swarm him and not foul. He could have held it for 4 or even 3 seconds and then thrown a bad pass and UConn wouldn't have had time. He could have made pass fake to get the defense to move than made a simple pass. He could have just dribbled the ball, he had room. And again, he could have just bent over and covered the ball up.
Because you have to go understand the situation. Duke didn’t even have to get the ball in the frontcourt. They inbounded with 10.0 seconds left. They didn’t have to advance the ball there.I too don’t understand the people who are killing Boozer. It’s a casual, coach-fan perspective.
He catches it at 7 seconds and there’s two UConn players immediately coming at him. In a trap situation at the end of game - when there’s two guys on you, you need to pass the ball. That’s kindergarten basketball. If you don’t, they’ll look to take your ball.
The problem, IMO, is that his teammates were so far back which made the pass too tough. A lot of it is bad luck.
I completely understand the reasoning to pass...it was failed execution.Here’s what Boozer sees:
View attachment 49051
There’s two UConn players coming to trap him. Up ahead he sees a wide open teammate - if the ball gets there, the game is 100% over.
At the end of the game against full court press, when you’re trapped, you need to pass the ball. What makes you think nothing will happen, they won’t try and pry the ball loose, and just award you a foul? A whole lot can go wrong in that situation as well.
In contrary, he sees a wide open teammate and if he hits him the game is over.
If we’re gonna play “you shouldn’t pass the ball,” then why did Sarr pass it to Boozer to begin with?
View attachment 49052
I guess what I’m saying is this is no guarantee. When you’re trapped against full court press, and you’ve pre-determined you won’t pass the ball, many times that can result in a turnover as well.If he holds it you have free throws and 5-6 seconds left. The game is over if he hits 2, Only hits 1 and you still are looking for a miracle shot just to tie.
He shouldn't have passed the ball either. LOL!Here’s what Boozer sees:
View attachment 49051
There’s two UConn players coming to trap him. Up ahead he sees a wide open teammate - if the ball gets there, the game is 100% over.
At the end of the game against full court press, when you’re trapped, you need to pass the ball. What makes you think nothing will happen, they won’t try and pry the ball loose, and just award you a foul? A whole lot can go wrong in that situation as well.
In contrary, he sees a wide open teammate and if he hits him the game is over.
If we’re gonna play “you shouldn’t pass the ball,” then why did Sarr pass it to Boozer to begin with?
View attachment 49052
Passing is not a bad thing. He just needs to be stronger with the ball. Turnovers aren’t always 100% about the decision — sometimes it comes down to being strong with the ball.I guess what I’m saying is this is no guarantee. When you’re trapped against full court press, and you’ve pre-determined you won’t pass the ball, many times that can result in a turnover as well.
Instead, he sees a wide open teammate up ahead. One super simple pass, which would’ve sealed it.
I think the first part is a very good picture.Here’s what Boozer sees:
View attachment 49051
There’s two UConn players coming to trap him. Up ahead he sees a wide open teammate - if the ball gets there, the game is 100% over.
At the end of the game against full court press, when you’re trapped, you need to pass the ball. What makes you think nothing will happen, they won’t try and pry the ball loose, and just award you a foul? A whole lot can go wrong in that situation as well.
In contrary, he sees a wide open teammate and if he hits him the game is over.
If we’re gonna play “you shouldn’t pass the ball,” then why did Sarr pass it to Boozer to begin with?
View attachment 49052
This. Very few guys are actually capable of making that shot from a shooting standpoint — at least in terms of such a pure release.That was such a talented shot by Mullins. Lots of times when you shoot from that far out, you’re form changes and you sort of fling the body in one direction.
That shot was so pure. Outstanding.