Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#452      
for the recruiting services it is a major embarrassment, absolutely no doubt about it. that there were mitigating circumstances (no shoe circuit AAU ball), doesn't give them a free pass
Keaton was killing it all summer. He arrived at Illinois more ready than I think anyone outside of the Wagler household believed he would be. He dominated the HS circuit in Kansas for two years. The same questions we hear about his athletic profile in NBA scouting, dogged him as a prep. The kid just knows how to play.

Rating over 140 guys better than a kid who averaged almost 30 points a game, went undefeated, won the 6A state title in Kansas, and was POY in the state is a bit egregious. He wasn't some kid they found lighting up old guys at the YMCA. If you are a scout, you can't judge it as anything but a miss.
My opinion is that recruiting websites' job is to sell clicks. I expect top programs to have better resources and talent evaluators, and I think the recruiting websites are mostly reacting (like dropping a guy who signs with us) and/or parroting what they hear. So I think it's more embarrassing for other programs than these websites (meaning I agree with your bolded statement, just that I don't consider media to be scouts).

And was Keaton (or at least his family) not considering redshirting?
 
#453      
Wagler's neglection should be no surprise to anyone. Humans are basically inclined to take the easy path most of the time...especially when others have evaluated that path for them. Head coaches are pretty busy trying to fill their rosters and do not look at every player who ever played varsity HS basketball. Unless they have extensive interviews with every prospect, they have little to no idea what rests in their character and what passions drive them to excel.

A guy who was a good friend of mine was a consensus All-State selection in Illinois and a honorable mention All-American basketball player. But he decided to pursiue golf in college with the dream of winning both the conference title (the top golf conference in the nation during his years of play) and the NCAA title as a senior. But not a single school wanted him to come play golf for them...so he walked-on. He did win that conference title, but failed to win the NCAA title...but he did finish second...twice.

The point is that BU seems to be more willing than most coaches to delve a bit deeper to find the EDG, kids that want to fit in an elite group, develop the skills to help the team win, do the little things, and trust their future to a staff that cares. Not saying that is truly the case, but all indications are that he has an elite eye for finding and developing players who fit his system and are not me first. I, for one, like that. And all indications are that it works just fine.
 
#454      
We may be now living in the days of the Illini bump…😳
Al Pacino Scarface GIF
 
#455      
for the recruiting services it is a major embarrassment, absolutely no doubt about it. that there were mitigating circumstances (no shoe circuit AAU ball), doesn't give them a free pass
A free pass from what? What's the penalty?

We literally have people celebrating three of our incoming freshmen getting major bumps by these same services.

Scouts, regardless of sport and regardless of level, see hundreds upon hundreds of players each year. Yes, the AAU Circuit and the various All Star events, where a thousand kids are whittled down to 50 makes a difference. Those kids put themselves in a spotlight. Coleman got his bump because he participated in these events and excelled. Is he a better player now than he was a month ago when he was a four star recruit? I sincerely doubt it.

The situation with Keaton will never happen again. Recruiting services whiffed, scouts whiffed, entire coaching staff's whiffed.....the ONLY ones on the planet that didn't miss are DePaul, Minnesota and Illinois.

If ANYONE should be roasted, it's the entire Kansas and Missouri staffs. The kid was right under their noses. How much effort would it have taken for one assistant, literally one, to hop in a car and hit a gym?

I have no clue why Keaton decided to stay low key with regards to marketing himself. I'm sure he has good reasons.

It worked out for him, but in reality.....he is Tyler Underwood away from being the best player at DePaul, tearing it up, and being a portal transfer playing his sophomore year this upcoming year.

The closest comp that we have to anything like this happening would be Steph Curry ending up at Davidson. How could Duke and UNC miss that one? The kid's dad was one of the best shooters on the planet and he played with Charlotte in the NBA.

As much as we dislike the sliminess that comes with AAU and shoes......not being a part of that could have costed Keaton millions.

Nobody, including our staff, saw this coming when we took him on. Did he have great potential and a lot of tools to work with and develop? Absolutely. Did they think he'd be a flippin' lottery pick when he signed? Heck, did they think that he'd EVER sniff the NBA when he signed? Probably not.

Let's take it one final step further. Does Drej transfer here if he knew that Keaton would be THE ball dominant player on the roster? Would Kylan have transferred away?

Let's give Tyler, MN and DePaul all of the credit in the world versus tearing down the entire system.
 
#456      
My opinion is that recruiting websites' job is to sell clicks. I expect top programs to have better resources and talent evaluators, and I think the recruiting websites are mostly reacting (like dropping a guy who signs with us) and/or parroting what they hear. So I think it's more embarrassing for other programs than these websites (meaning I agree with your bolded statement, just that I don't consider media to be scouts).

And was Keaton (or at least his family) not considering redshirting?
Agreed about the clicks. Coleman got bumped to a 5 star, it got posted here in celebratory manner and I'm sure it generated a ton of clicks.

These services are money machines and we all buy in.
 
#457      
My opinion is that recruiting websites' job is to sell clicks. I expect top programs to have better resources and talent evaluators, and I think the recruiting websites are mostly reacting (like dropping a guy who signs with us) and/or parroting what they hear. So I think it's more embarrassing for other programs than these websites (meaning I agree with your bolded statement, just that I don't consider media to be scouts).

And was Keaton (or at least his family) not considering redshirting?
The big issue is that even scouts/websites that make an honest effort to actually evaluate prospects and then rank them can't see every basketball player in the country. They end up focusing on the big AAU tournaments where they can see a ton of players at the same time/place. Wagler didn't play on an AAU team affiliated with the shoe companies, so he didn't play in many of those tournaments, so they just didn't see him play. Scouts don't base as much on high school play because the talent levels can be so uneven.
 
#458      
I remember the days of the Illini dip...
Weber and Groce staff was not as good at evaluating talent or we were desperate and took leftovers

Mike Shaw
Brian Carlswell
Alex Legion
DJ Williams
Jaylon Tate
Myke Henry
 
#459      
...and I get how this discussion about Wagler's recruiting can trigger some strong opinions. To say nobody could have possibly seen his potential makes it sound like we just got lucky.

I think the truth is likely some of both- we probably got lucky that we even stumbled upon him in the first place and gave his film a serious look, then applied some good talent evaluation (especially regarding the type of player we want), then got lucky that he turned out to be even better than we imagined, then we did a really good job at developing him and our offense around him.

I don't expect a repeat of that extreme upside in many/any of our recruits going forward. And that's just fine if we can grow our resources and reputation and get some upside from some recruits/transfers on a regular basis (while putting together and coaching up players who fit well).

In other words, getting modest upside from #10-30 recruits/transfers is a better long-term plan than thinking we have some exceptional ability to find stars who everyone else overlooks.
 
Last edited:
#461      
The big issue is that even scouts/websites that make an honest effort to actually evaluate prospects and then rank them can't see every basketball player in the country. They end up focusing on the big AAU tournaments where they can see a ton of players at the same time/place. Wagler didn't play on an AAU team affiliated with the shoe companies, so he didn't play in many of those tournaments, so they just didn't see him play. Scouts don't base as much on high school play because the talent levels can be so uneven.
Exactly. Whittling ANYTHING from 1,000+ down to 25, with any sort of legitimate accuracy is impossible, especially in a line of work where physically maturity of the subjects isn't complete.

The best that they can do is get everyone in one place, then compare, contrast, take notes and come up with something close to accurate. If you remove yourself from that one place.....you're not putting anything out there to compare.

Heck, the NBA Combine does exactly that and they STILL screw it up! They're only looking at 70 guys, who all have tape and who all are doing the same exact drills in a 100% controlled environment.
 
#462      
I vividly remember DJ Williams and Aaron Jordan having a photo together on the football field in chairs sitting in front of a final four trophy. I remember thinking that would be a possibility. How far we have come in our mentality about the program and how real it is now that we can have that expectation. Little did I realize how far off we were at the time.
 
#463      
The big issue is that even scouts/websites that make an honest effort to actually evaluate prospects and then rank them can't see every basketball player in the country. They end up focusing on the big AAU tournaments where they can see a ton of players at the same time/place. Wagler didn't play on an AAU team affiliated with the shoe companies, so he didn't play in many of those tournaments, so they just didn't see him play. Scouts don't base as much on high school play because the talent levels can be so uneven.
This. There are just too many players to legimately rank them. It's not too hard to see say a Lebron and recognize that there're elite, but after those obvious types it's almost impossible.
 
#468      
QC is 15 on On3, 22 on ESPN, 34 on 247.

The 247 rankings will be updated soon, while the other two have already made their final release.

The 247 composite - which has him 27 - is the combined average of all three.
And there it is. You could see it coming with how the 247 guys raved about him on podcasts.
 
#469      
#473      
Constanza's really fallen in the rankings.


I remember the first time QC's name appeared on this board (Landon Davis commitment thread) -- he was a 3star, outside the top 100. Constanza was certified top 20.

Where is at now, there is no commitment in his profile
 
#475      
This is not exactly a Muppet news flash, but he is such a gifted shooter. The thought of Coleman and Davis on the court together for stretches is exciting. As great as our offenses have been, and they have been excellent, we have struggled to make wide open shots consistently.

Coleman will help that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back