Illini Basketball 2026-2027

Status
Not open for further replies.
#279      
stevej64
Mayor of Green Street is an important role on the team that is passed down from one generation to the next. It was definitely Dee then Brandon Paul in my years in Champaign.
Click to expand...

Not that I know, but can’t believe ColeHawk wasn’t the Mayor at some point. That’s kind of disappointing to hear.
 
#284      
PepeSilvia
Mayor of Green Street is an important role on the team that is passed down from one generation to the next. It was definitely Dee then Brandon Paul in my years in Champaign.
Click to expand...
Rayvonte Rice was always out to bridge the gap between Paul and Trent. Though honestly a lot of guys from the Groce era were out which maybe explains why they were so bad.

Sidenote: was back in town for the marathon and it's sad how bad the campus bars are now compared to even a decade ago.

Firehaus, Cly's, and White Ho are all gone.

Legends, Joe's, and Murphys are the only bars left near the quad/campus and half of Murphy's is gone. There used to be like seven bars within two blocks of each other there(the aforementioned 3 and Kams, Firehaus, Cly's, brothers, and white horse).

That entire little area always had something going on.

Then you have Kams which feels soulless now even if the previous iteration was a bit gross. Then Illini and Brothers also feel weirdly generic, cheap, and soulless in their new construction.

Im sure students will find a way to have fun but I enjoyed how everything was close together(except Red lion), Illini inn was a hole in the wall, and you could watch fights break out from brothers while sitting at the widow tables in Murphys.
 
#287      
OrangeBlue98
As someone who inadvertently started a Loyalty tangent last week, I always appreciate these off-topic runs. This one was fun and brought back some good memories.
 
#291      
Fly Illini Fly!
PleaseMakeABowlGame said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2057157864616067437
Click to expand...
If the question is asking whether it’s more likely than not? Within the next 10 years? The smarter bet would be no.

I don’t think we’ll be that great defensively. To win the whole thing nowadays, you need to be ELITE on offense AND defense (top 5). We’re in the era of super teams; a decade ago that was probably a little different. SEVEN of the 8 one seeds the past two years have had +35 ratings on Kenpom. That’s completely unprecedented historically, and the top of the sport is operating at a different level.

I think our formula is good for multiple Final Fours; however, you’re inevitably going to run into that juggernaut team on both ends (Michigan, UCONN two years ago, etc).
 
Last edited:
#294      
Emerson Bigguns
Fly Illini Fly! said:
If the question is asking whether it’s more likely than not? Within the next 10 years? The smarter bet would be no.

I don’t think we’ll be that great defensively. To win the whole thing nowadays, you need to be ELITE on offense AND defense (top 5). We’re in the era of super teams; a decade ago that was probably a little different. SEVEN of the 8 one seeds the past two years have had +35 ratings on Kenpom. That’s completely unprecedented historically, and the top of the sport is operating at a different level.

I think our formula is good for multiple Final Fours; however, you’re inevitably going to run into that juggernaut team on both ends (Michigan, UCONN two years ago, etc).
Click to expand...
I think we could be better defensively. Defense often comes down to a consistent team effort, and communication. We were a different team defensively in the tournament. We installed a lot of new wrinkles and a different philosophy over the course of last year. Continuity within Coach Cam's principles will help on that end, and proof of concept is now there, s buy-in should be higher. It's many of these guys' last chance to do something special at this level and make an impression on scouts. The returnees know what it takes to play well on that end, and they know they are capable. They just have to take that challenge more consistently.

There are definitely questions on the perimeter on how well we can defend. We have the length to make it difficult for most teams. Clearly, Vaaks wasn't good on that end last year, but his whole team was lousy. (Providence was 323rd in DRtg...and Kim English is job hunting) His defensive metrics were mostly in line with those of his teammates. Those stats are really noisy, because they only measure team stops, and if no one is executing well, it's really hard to judge who is at fault... and ultimately, effort suffers when you are unsuccessful.

Stojakovic had questions on that end coming in. He was better than we thought he would be. Perhaps Vaaks can make similar strides. I'm sure he will get tested a lot, but our help defense should be better, and an expanded role for Z can't hurt. He was easily our best defensive player last year.

Coleman is a good enough athlete to be able to stay in front of his man. Strength will be a question, but it also was for Keaton, so it should not be a huge drop off. He probably has a better chance to be good on that end due to being a more quick twitch athlete.
 
#295      
ChiefGritty
Emerson Bigguns said:
I think we could be better defensively. Defense often comes down to a consistent team effort, and communication. We were a different team defensively in the tournament. We installed a lot of new wrinkles and a different philosophy over the course of last year. Continuity within Coach Cam's principles will help on that end, and proof of concept is now there, s buy-in should be higher. It's many of these guys' last chance to do something special at this level and make an impression on scouts. The returnees know what it takes to play well on that end, and they know they are capable. They just have to take that challenge more consistently.

There are definitely questions on the perimeter on how well we can defend. We have the length to make it difficult for most teams. Clearly, Vaaks wasn't good on that end last year, but his whole team was lousy. (Providence was 323rd in DRtg...and Kim English is job hunting) His defensive metrics were mostly in line with those of his teammates. Those stats are really noisy, because they only measure team stops, and if no one is executing well, it's really hard to judge who is at fault... and ultimately, effort suffers when you are unsuccessful.

Stojakovic had questions on that end coming in. He was better than we thought he would be. Perhaps Vaaks can make similar strides. I'm sure he will get tested a lot, but our help defense should be better, and an expanded role for Z can't hurt. He was easily our best defensive player last year.

Coleman is a good enough athlete to be able to stay in front of his man. Strength will be a question, but it also was for Keaton, so it should not be a huge drop off. He probably has a better chance to be good on that end due to being a more quick twitch athlete.
Click to expand...
I don't necessarily disagree with any of this, but it's a very optimistic gloss on what is the biggest downside risk factor for next year's team (assuming Stojakovic returns).

The matchup hunter becomes the matchup huntee.
 
#297      
wc_illini
ChiefGritty said:
I don't necessarily disagree with any of this, but it's a very optimistic gloss on what is the biggest downside risk factor for next year's team (assuming Stojakovic returns).

The matchup hunter becomes the matchup huntee.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and while our defensive metrics were significantly better against VCU and Houston and got me very excited, they were back on par with our season averages against Iowa and UConn, so I'm not sure what the takeaway is going into next year.

We have a consistent trend going back many seasons of having great defensive metrics (adjusted for opponent ORTG) against Q2+ opponents, but not so great against Q1, and that probably needs to get fixed if we want a good chance at a natty.
 
#300      
mysterio2525
I remember $2 long islands at canopy.

Parks And Recreation Dancing GIF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back