2026 FIFA World Cup Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#352      
Brazil is toast. Another top 10 team ousted.

For a good long while now... the World Cup is THE Sporting event for most of the Planet. Nothing else comes close. Nothing on this scale or level of following.

Many Americans don’t grasp the shame and disappointment and anger in a Nation that happens when ‘Their’ club is out. Not so for the clubs and Nations that aren’t expected to be among the elite... but within the elite clubs themselves and their International followings.

For most Americans that follow the (now) Five major sports leagues... there is ‘Always Next Year’ for their chosen team. Not so with the World Cup. Oh, there are other regional tournaments worth some bragging rights. But not to the level of the World Cup. Gotta wait a longer time and in a different time.

America has surprised the rest of the World with the level of our understanding and passion for the sport demonstrated these past weeks. Not yet near the level of the Other Guys... but growing fast.

Some of the anti-American feelings that have fostered abroad are melting away with the folks who made the trip and found out that the American people are not terrible as they may have been propagandized. And the food they are enjoying turned out to be DELICIOUS.

This is going to open some eyes and make for interesting conversations back in their homelands.
 
#353      
Looks like the reason is that FIFA agreed that VAR officials broke the established protocols by showing improper video footage to the on-field ref:

"VAR made their recommendation to the referee based on slow-motion and still replays, which is not aligned with VAR protocols, as these should be used for only point-of-contact purposes in a red card tackle situation."
White House calling FIFA President probably didnt have anything to do with it...
 
#355      
Some of the anti-American feelings that have fostered abroad are melting away with the folks who made the trip and found out that the American people are not terrible as they may have been propagandized. And the food they are enjoying turned out to be DELICIOUS.

This is going to open some eyes and make for interesting conversations back in their homelands.
Who would have thought the missing ingredient to world peace was ranch dressing.
 
#356      
White House calling FIFA President probably didnt have anything to do with it...
From the organization that let Qatar continue to host the World Cup after it was established that they paid cash bribes for votes?

shocked philip j fry GIF


Yeah, putting aside whether it's the right or wrong result (probably right result for wrong reasons) I think it's safe to say the suspension doesn't get changed if it's a Paraguay or DR Congo player rather than an American. I love soccer and have closely followed every World Cup since I was 9. But FIFA has always been corrupt, and under Infantino has reached a whole new level.
 
#359      
At least the England players/fans are getting to experience how pissy Mexico fans get when things don't go right for their side.

Just the fans? Game has been incredibly chippy. Mexican players have always had tendency to throw sportsmanship out the window when the pressure is on.
 
#369      
FIFA opened up a can of worms let's see what they do now I guess:

Yep, there's precedent now and the US is viewed as the big bully on the block. It'll be interesting.
 
#370      
FIFA opened up a can of worms let's see what they do now I guess:


Well - they didn't break VAR protocols to review the incident. But, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
 
#371      
Well - they didn't break VAR protocols to review the incident. But, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Sure but the decision to suspend is not contingent on the VAR protocols question, and they didn't actually overturn the red card. The red card still stands, as does the suspension. They just suspended the suspension for a year so presumably he'll have to serve it the next US game after that year is up. They could do that for any player, for any reason, and now England will argue that they should do it for their guy because they did it for Balo.
 
#372      
From the organization that let Qatar continue to host the World Cup after it was established that they paid cash bribes for votes?

shocked philip j fry GIF


Yeah, putting aside whether it's the right or wrong result (probably right result for wrong reasons) I think it's safe to say the suspension doesn't get changed if it's a Paraguay or DR Congo player rather than an American. I love soccer and have closely followed every World Cup since I was 9. But FIFA has always been corrupt, and under Infantino has reached a whole new level.
FIFA is the most corrupt organization in the world just ahead of Chicago politics.
 
#373      
Yep, there's precedent now and the US is viewed as the big bully on the block. It'll be interesting.
The precedent had already been set before Balogun. This is from ESPN:
FIFA in November deferred the final two games of a three-match ban for Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo for a red card against Ireland in a World Cup qualifier, allowing him to play at the start of the World Cup.

Argentina defender Nicolás Otamendi and Ecuador midfielder Moisés Caicedo in April had one-game bans deferred for red cards in qualifiers, also allowing them to be available for World Cup openers.

Brazil's Garrincha was ejected from a 1962 semifinal but allowed to play in the final against Chile after political pressure.
 
#374      
The precedent had already been set before Balogun. This is from ESPN:
Those first two are different in that they are suspensions for red cards from non-World Cup games. FIFA did the Ronaldo one (which was purely because they wanted Ronaldo for TV viewership reasons) and then did the other two as part of an amnesty on all suspensions from WC qualifers, which they felt they had to after Ronaldo (which is exactly what might happen here with Quansah's suspension).

The 1962 precendent is the only one that is similar and that was a case study in corruption in sport. It involved political pressure, a president telling a referree from his own country to tone down his testimony, and out-and-out bribery. Not sure that's one we want to hang our hats on.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back