England-Mexico pushed back to 8:00 PM CT.
Brazil is toast. Another top 10 team ousted.
White House calling FIFA President probably didnt have anything to do with it...Looks like the reason is that FIFA agreed that VAR officials broke the established protocols by showing improper video footage to the on-field ref:
"VAR made their recommendation to the referee based on slow-motion and still replays, which is not aligned with VAR protocols, as these should be used for only point-of-contact purposes in a red card tackle situation."
Who would have thought the missing ingredient to world peace was ranch dressing.Some of the anti-American feelings that have fostered abroad are melting away with the folks who made the trip and found out that the American people are not terrible as they may have been propagandized. And the food they are enjoying turned out to be DELICIOUS.
This is going to open some eyes and make for interesting conversations back in their homelands.
From the organization that let Qatar continue to host the World Cup after it was established that they paid cash bribes for votes?White House calling FIFA President probably didnt have anything to do with it...
At least the England players/fans are getting to experience how pissy Mexico fans get when things don't go right for their side.
Yep, there's precedent now and the US is viewed as the big bully on the block. It'll be interesting.FIFA opened up a can of worms let's see what they do now I guess:
![]()
Will Jarell Quansah’s World Cup red-card ban be suspended like Folarin Balogun’s?
Quansah was sent off during England’s last-16 win over Mexico and is set to miss the quarter-final with Norway but could he try to follow the precedent Fifa set by suspending Balogun’s ban?www.independent.co.uk
FIFA opened up a can of worms let's see what they do now I guess:
![]()
Will Jarell Quansah’s World Cup red-card ban be suspended like Folarin Balogun’s?
Quansah was sent off during England’s last-16 win over Mexico and is set to miss the quarter-final with Norway but could he try to follow the precedent Fifa set by suspending Balogun’s ban?www.independent.co.uk
Sure but the decision to suspend is not contingent on the VAR protocols question, and they didn't actually overturn the red card. The red card still stands, as does the suspension. They just suspended the suspension for a year so presumably he'll have to serve it the next US game after that year is up. They could do that for any player, for any reason, and now England will argue that they should do it for their guy because they did it for Balo.Well - they didn't break VAR protocols to review the incident. But, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
FIFA is the most corrupt organization in the world just ahead of Chicago politics.From the organization that let Qatar continue to host the World Cup after it was established that they paid cash bribes for votes?
![]()
Yeah, putting aside whether it's the right or wrong result (probably right result for wrong reasons) I think it's safe to say the suspension doesn't get changed if it's a Paraguay or DR Congo player rather than an American. I love soccer and have closely followed every World Cup since I was 9. But FIFA has always been corrupt, and under Infantino has reached a whole new level.
The precedent had already been set before Balogun. This is from ESPN:Yep, there's precedent now and the US is viewed as the big bully on the block. It'll be interesting.
FIFA in November deferred the final two games of a three-match ban for Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo for a red card against Ireland in a World Cup qualifier, allowing him to play at the start of the World Cup.
Argentina defender Nicolás Otamendi and Ecuador midfielder Moisés Caicedo in April had one-game bans deferred for red cards in qualifiers, also allowing them to be available for World Cup openers.
Brazil's Garrincha was ejected from a 1962 semifinal but allowed to play in the final against Chile after political pressure.
Those first two are different in that they are suspensions for red cards from non-World Cup games. FIFA did the Ronaldo one (which was purely because they wanted Ronaldo for TV viewership reasons) and then did the other two as part of an amnesty on all suspensions from WC qualifers, which they felt they had to after Ronaldo (which is exactly what might happen here with Quansah's suspension).The precedent had already been set before Balogun. This is from ESPN: