Mirk is shredded.
I’ll answer this one succinctly:
I think I figured it out. The "Talent" rating for Cal exactly agrees with the weighted average of the RecruiT-Rank for their players (after filling in missing values for two of their freshman using reasonable estimates). I then compared the RecruiT-Rank of their players with the 247 Composite Rating of those players (using the original rating out of high school for upperclassmen), and those are almost a perfect line. I went back and tweaked my estimated RecruiT-Rank for the two freshman using that line, and the weighted average for the team was still almost exactly the same as their Talent rating.Yeah, I don’t really understand Torvik’s talent ranking. How is Cal ranked 86 in his projections but 7 on talent? 247 puts this year’s Cal transfer class at 60 and it’s recruiting class at 65. 51 and 85 last year. So I’m not sure how that adds up to the 7th most talented team in college basketball.
View attachment 50861
That said, Vegas’s player of the year odds have 3 Illinois players ahead of the top ranked USC player.
the nut buster would be middle of the big ten pack if he wasn't on Izzo's team.
Thanks for digging into that.I think I figured it out. The "Talent" rating for Cal exactly agrees with the weighted average of the RecruiT-Rank for their players (after filling in missing values for two of their freshman using reasonable estimates). I then compared the RecruiT-Rank of their players with the 247 Composite Rating of those players (using the original rating out of high school for upperclassmen), and those are almost a perfect line. I went back and tweaked my estimated RecruiT-Rank for the two freshman using that line, and the weighted average for the team was still almost exactly the same as their Talent rating.
If that's true, then Talent is a severely out-of-date measurement for upperclassmen and can be ignored. So USC's players were more heralded out of high school than ours, but who cares now?
If Brad and Muss swapped teams tomorrow, I'd bet on Brad to finish higher in the B1G.If Brad rolled out USC’s roster in 2026/2027, the fans on this board would want him fired.
Thanks! I got it done today. Go Illlini!select Renew Season Tickets on your home page, and that will take you to the link to request UC tickets.
Depends on the coach - roster building to make the best team is different than just signing the highest ranked portal or HS kidsIf the portal NIL era is teaching us anything, it's that grab bags of high expected value individuals in a context that doesn't organize and maximize them well is often a path to nowhere.
I don't have time for a deep dive on exact stats, but for the past 5 champion teams, its been 7-8 of the best players playing 10 or more minutes down the stretch through the tournament. It's rarely 8 players in 1 game, for champions it tends to be 7 that have 10 or more.
Part of what makes Brad's calculus work is that he bets on character over characters. I don't know much about the character of the guys at USC presently, but Muss should have seen the Chad Baker-Mazara drama coming from miles away...If Brad and Muss swapped teams tomorrow, I'd bet on Brad to finish higher in the B1G.
If the portal NIL era is teaching us anything, it's that grab bags of high expected value individuals in a context that doesn't organize and maximize them well is often a path to nowhere.
I don't see any reason to trust the USC situation, whereas Illinois with Brad and this kind of continuity is about as high floor as it gets.
85 is too low. 11 is too high.Basket Under Review is doing a preseason top 100 player list. They’ve released their honorable mentions and 100-76 so far.
HM:
Jacob Coffie (USC)
Eian Elmer (WIS)
Sam Orme (NEB)
Eric Dailey (UCLA)
Jaylen Petty (UCLA)
Tomislav Bujan (MAR)
93. Pharrel Payne (MAR)
92. Wesley Yates (WAS)
88. Braden Frager (NEB)
86. Nikola Kusturica (UCLA)
85. Stefan Vaaks (ILL)
76. JP Estrella
Don’t agree with a lot of this list so far…
Vaaks has the 11th best odds to win the Wooden in Vegas… 85th??
Illinois is deeper than Michigan.
We aren't as deep as USC or Michigan State.
I don’t know. As the lead guard, Vaaks will likely be the highest usage player on a projected 1 seed. 3rd team All American equivalent is definitely in play.85 is too low. 11 is too high.
As of right now, this looks like aNew ESPN bracketology. espn bracket
Illinois 1 seed in what I think would be a great bracket.
would stomp either Auburn or Ohio State in second round
get to beat either Kansas or Tennessee in sweet 16. nether of those teams can score with us.
elite 8 we would likely play either Virginia as 3 seed or Texas as 2 seed. likely give Sean Miller another elite 8 loss.
Some of the incoming freshman are further along than expected. Going to be some tough calls.
This isn't just from the staff, so not just your typical "rose colored" assessment during the summer.
Vaaks / Mirk / Andrej are the engines to our offense.I don’t know. As the lead guard, Vaaks will likely be the highest usage player on a projected 1 seed. 3rd team All American equivalent is definitely in play.
Cracking the top 7 won’t be easy.Some of the incoming freshman are further along than expected. Going to be some tough calls.
This isn't just from the staff, so not just your typical "rose colored" assessment during the summer.
![]()
Somebody needs to sell me on Michigan State because I don't see it. They have 1 really good player.
![]()
Somebody needs to sell me on Michigan State because I don't see it. They have 1 really good player.
Some of the incoming freshman are further along than expected. Going to be some tough calls.
This isn't just from the staff, so not just your typical "rose colored" assessment during the summer.