Illini Basketball 2026-2027

Status
Not open for further replies.
#553      
Yeah, I don’t really understand Torvik’s talent ranking. How is Cal ranked 86 in his projections but 7 on talent? 247 puts this year’s Cal transfer class at 60 and it’s recruiting class at 65. 51 and 85 last year. So I’m not sure how that adds up to the 7th most talented team in college basketball.

View attachment 50861

That said, Vegas’s player of the year odds have 3 Illinois players ahead of the top ranked USC player.
I think I figured it out. The "Talent" rating for Cal exactly agrees with the weighted average of the RecruiT-Rank for their players (after filling in missing values for two of their freshman using reasonable estimates). I then compared the RecruiT-Rank of their players with the 247 Composite Rating of those players (using the original rating out of high school for upperclassmen), and those are almost a perfect line. I went back and tweaked my estimated RecruiT-Rank for the two freshman using that line, and the weighted average for the team was still almost exactly the same as their Talent rating.

If that's true, then Talent is a severely out-of-date measurement for upperclassmen and can be ignored. So USC's players were more heralded out of high school than ours, but who cares now?
 
#554      
Basket Under Review is doing a preseason top 100 player list. They’ve released their honorable mentions and 100-76 so far.

HM:
Jacob Coffie (USC)
Eian Elmer (WIS)
Sam Orme (NEB)
Eric Dailey (UCLA)
Jaylen Petty (UCLA)
Tomislav Bujan (MAR)

93. Pharrel Payne (MAR)
92. Wesley Yates (WAS)
88. Braden Frager (NEB)
86. Nikola Kusturica (UCLA)
85. Stefan Vaaks (ILL)
76. JP Estrella

Don’t agree with a lot of this list so far…

Vaaks has the 11th best odds to win the Wooden in Vegas… 85th??
 
#556      
I think I figured it out. The "Talent" rating for Cal exactly agrees with the weighted average of the RecruiT-Rank for their players (after filling in missing values for two of their freshman using reasonable estimates). I then compared the RecruiT-Rank of their players with the 247 Composite Rating of those players (using the original rating out of high school for upperclassmen), and those are almost a perfect line. I went back and tweaked my estimated RecruiT-Rank for the two freshman using that line, and the weighted average for the team was still almost exactly the same as their Talent rating.

If that's true, then Talent is a severely out-of-date measurement for upperclassmen and can be ignored. So USC's players were more heralded out of high school than ours, but who cares now?
Thanks for digging into that.

The best measure of top end talent on each team is likely the Vegas player of the year betting odds, which we come out way ahead of USC in.

But I’ll concede that those odds don’t account for which team has the better bench. Does that favor USC? Maybe.

If you remove the 5 top projected contributors from USC according to Torvik and do the same for Illinois, USC comes out ranked 73 while Illinois falls to 80.

So USC might be slightly deeper. But if I could choose between having the better 1st, 2nd, and 3rd man and having the better 9th and 10th man, I’ll take the top end talent.
 
#557      
If Brad rolled out USC’s roster in 2026/2027, the fans on this board would want him fired.
If Brad and Muss swapped teams tomorrow, I'd bet on Brad to finish higher in the B1G.

If the portal NIL era is teaching us anything, it's that grab bags of high expected value individuals in a context that doesn't organize and maximize them well is often a path to nowhere.

I don't see any reason to trust the USC situation, whereas Illinois with Brad and this kind of continuity is about as high floor as it gets.
 
#560      
If the portal NIL era is teaching us anything, it's that grab bags of high expected value individuals in a context that doesn't organize and maximize them well is often a path to nowhere.
Depends on the coach - roster building to make the best team is different than just signing the highest ranked portal or HS kids

Last years big $ disappointments . And yes everybody gets injuries.

USC
Kentucky
Kansas State
 
#561      
I don't have time for a deep dive on exact stats, but for the past 5 champion teams, its been 7-8 of the best players playing 10 or more minutes down the stretch through the tournament. It's rarely 8 players in 1 game, for champions it tends to be 7 that have 10 or more.

I'd say typical is 7 at 10+. Guards can often play heavy minutes, but bigs usually have a back-up or need their fouls managed.
Specifically for Illlinois, last few years, we've had 6th - 8th over 10 min:
Ben - Jake - Big Z
Tre White - Morez - DGL
Luke - Justin - Dain
 
#562      
If Brad and Muss swapped teams tomorrow, I'd bet on Brad to finish higher in the B1G.

If the portal NIL era is teaching us anything, it's that grab bags of high expected value individuals in a context that doesn't organize and maximize them well is often a path to nowhere.

I don't see any reason to trust the USC situation, whereas Illinois with Brad and this kind of continuity is about as high floor as it gets.
Part of what makes Brad's calculus work is that he bets on character over characters. I don't know much about the character of the guys at USC presently, but Muss should have seen the Chad Baker-Mazara drama coming from miles away...

Despite some rosters that looked decent on paper, they have yet to finfish better than 9th in the B1G.
 
#563      
Basket Under Review is doing a preseason top 100 player list. They’ve released their honorable mentions and 100-76 so far.

HM:
Jacob Coffie (USC)
Eian Elmer (WIS)
Sam Orme (NEB)
Eric Dailey (UCLA)
Jaylen Petty (UCLA)
Tomislav Bujan (MAR)

93. Pharrel Payne (MAR)
92. Wesley Yates (WAS)
88. Braden Frager (NEB)
86. Nikola Kusturica (UCLA)
85. Stefan Vaaks (ILL)
76. JP Estrella

Don’t agree with a lot of this list so far…

Vaaks has the 11th best odds to win the Wooden in Vegas… 85th??
85 is too low. 11 is too high.
 
#564      
Illinois is deeper than Michigan.

We aren't as deep as USC or Michigan State.
Say What GIF by NBA


Somebody needs to sell me on Michigan State because I don't see it. They have 1 really good player.
 
#565      
New ESPN bracketology. espn bracket

Illinois 1 seed in what I think would be a great bracket.

would stomp either Auburn or Ohio State in second round

get to beat either Kansas or Tennessee in sweet 16. nether of those teams can score with us.

elite 8 we would likely play either Virginia as 3 seed or Texas as 2 seed. likely give Sean Miller another elite 8 loss.
 
#567      
New ESPN bracketology. espn bracket

Illinois 1 seed in what I think would be a great bracket.

would stomp either Auburn or Ohio State in second round

get to beat either Kansas or Tennessee in sweet 16. nether of those teams can score with us.

elite 8 we would likely play either Virginia as 3 seed or Texas as 2 seed. likely give Sean Miller another elite 8 loss.
As of right now, this looks like a

Salivating Homer Simpson GIF


Of course, the way the season shakes up will change a lot of things.
 
#570      
I don’t know. As the lead guard, Vaaks will likely be the highest usage player on a projected 1 seed. 3rd team All American equivalent is definitely in play.
Vaaks / Mirk / Andrej are the engines to our offense.

Tomi and QC are a slight step below, but will be very productive.
 
#571      
Some of the incoming freshman are further along than expected. Going to be some tough calls.

This isn't just from the staff, so not just your typical "rose colored" assessment during the summer.
Cracking the top 7 won’t be easy.

Vaaks
Coleman
Andrej
Mirk
Tomi
Z
Jake

^^^ That’s an incredibly established top 7. Even Jake, who could be described as the weakest of those 7, was a starter on a Final Four team last year.

8, 9, and 10 are completely up for grabs. With Morillo being the highest ranked recruit of the remaining freshman, you’d think 8 would belong to him. But it sounds like there’s gonna be a battle for that spot.
 
#572      
Really hoping for one of Morillo or Williams to pop. Both offer different upsides in the immediate if either one do.

Williams on one hand gives you an element of speed and athleticism defensively and in transition we really only have from Andrej currently. While Morillo with his height and versatility and onball skills seems like a perfect match offensively for what this group does.

With news of Kitt putting together a monster summer i think the talent evaluation of this staff is just operating at an insanely high level right now. Brad gets a ton of credit for adjusting to his personnel, as he should. But I'm thrilled he's settled into a bit of a style and type here - doubling down on strenghts.
 
#574      
Say What GIF by NBA


Somebody needs to sell me on Michigan State because I don't see it. They have 1 really good player.

Sadly, I think i do. I'm a big Scott fan, and Glenn is a really nice player. Their backcourt and depth along with it is good.

Gotta replace a strong frontcourt though, so for sure flagging that.

I'd take them second at present moment over Michigan though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back