Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

#101      
At what point are we going to realize /understand that a few people having most of the money is bad for the game/community/country such that they can control the outcome by spending an insignificant (to them) amount of money? Hopefully, before it no longer is a game and nobody wants to play.
 
#102      
At what point are we going to realize /understand that a few people having most of the money is bad for the game/community/country such that they can control the outcome by spending an insignificant (to them) amount of money? Hopefully, before it no longer is a game and nobody wants to play.

Season 2 Nbc GIF by The Office
 
#103      
At what point are we going to realize /understand that a few people having most of the money is bad for the game/community/country such that they can control the outcome by spending an insignificant (to them) amount of money? Hopefully, before it no longer is a game and nobody wants to play.

pretty soon, it's gonna be boar on the floor for virtually everyone
 
#104      
We won a lot of games by very small margins. Having a kicker like Olano is a very big part of that success. Last year Alabama’s kicker only made 69.6%. If it was that easy to find a good kicker how is bama using that kid

We've had a great kicking program since the Lovie days. Its not like Olano was some outlier that weve never seen before and will never be able to replicate again.
 
#105      
At what point are we going to realize /understand that a few people having most of the money is bad for the game/community/country such that they can control the outcome by spending an insignificant (to them) amount of money? Hopefully, before it no longer is a game and nobody wants to play.
CFB needs to decide if they want to follow the

NFL model and have new and different teams in the playoffs every year due to salary caps
or
MLB model where the same teams are in the playoffs every year

as is , the playing field is not level
 
#106      
CFB needs to decide if they want to follow the

NFL model and have new and different teams in the playoffs every year due to salary caps
or
MLB model where the same teams are in the playoffs every year

as is , the playing field is not level
But I would contend that it's more level than before NIL. I believe some of the top teams had robust NIL programs before NIL.
 
#107      
At what point are we going to realize /understand that a few people having most of the money is bad for the game/community/country such that they can control the outcome by spending an insignificant (to them) amount of money? Hopefully, before it no longer is a game and nobody wants to play.

The formerly pathetic IU football won it all last year. A historically very poor Illinois football program won 19 games the past 2 seasons.

Where is the problem? I ask this of everyone/anyone.
 
#108      
NCAA Championship Game

2026 - Indiana vs. Miami
2025 - OSU vs. ND
2024 - Michigan vs. Washington
2023 - Georgia vs. TCU
2022 - Georgia vs. Alabama


The last 10 (or 9) teams to play for the championship, only Georgia has repeated, ending with blowing out TCU in 2023. I don't believe they have won a playoff game since.

So far, despite some teams spending crazy money, no one has dominated the playoffs.
 
#109      
But I would contend that it's more level than before NIL. I believe some of the top teams had robust NIL programs before NIL.
100%. The top programs had tons of money flowing under the table. The only teams that want this model back or caps on spending are the ones who can find ways to bypass it.

College football is better and more diverse at the top due to the introduction of free market and transfer rules. We are still going to be outspent, but we were anyways. At least now we can go get guys we feel are worth the price.
 
#110      
Well I named the biggest in my opinion. I think perfection on PATs and 20/23 on FGs, including some clutch ones, will be missed.

I think McCollum also will be missed, others may disagree or talk about fit in a 3-3-5, I just hate being outspent I guess. Feels too much like the old days, just more aboveboard (and therefore more visible) now.
In addition to Olano, I was disappointed in losing Eli Coenen. But, I think we are clearly net positive for the year.
 
#111      
The formerly pathetic IU football won it all last year. A historically very poor Illinois football program won 19 games the past 2 seasons.

Where is the problem? I ask this of everyone/anyone.
Exactly. It is very flawed system; albeit a system that provides a way more even playing field than the flawed system that preceded it. I just feel that anything this bad for the SEC has got to be good; amirite?
 
#112      
The formerly pathetic IU football won it all last year. A historically very poor Illinois football program won 19 games the past 2 seasons.

Where is the problem? I ask this of everyone/anyone.
Can I like this post 10x?

Before NIL - certain "blue bloods" won by PAYING PLAYERS.

Bill Self's last 3 teams are the bottom 3 worst finishes he has had as a coach. Hmm, wonder why!
 
#114      
Can I like this post 10x?

Before NIL - certain "blue bloods" won by PAYING PLAYERS.

Bill Self's last 3 teams are the bottom 3 worst finishes he has had as a coach. Hmm, wonder why!
It’s less about the current state and benefits than the trajectory.
 
#118      
Bowen and Beerman would be so good at LB (Unless he plays TE). Maybe another pretty good season (CFP) can change some of these guys' minds.
Would love to add Bowen, odds are no. I was looking at some measurables on the roster and noticed we have some tall LB’s and Beerman being one of them. It had me wondering/nervous, but I think with the new defense maybe being more multiple we can get some of these guys on the edge and disrupt some passing lanes. We will see what kind of speed they have. I’m not anticipating this defense to stop a lot of short yardage situations. I hope to be wrong. As long we can stay out of those situation and get TO’s, we will all be happy.
 
#119      
Would love to add Bowen, odds are no. I was looking at some measurables on the roster and noticed we have some tall LB’s and Beerman being one of them. It had me wondering/nervous, but I think with the new defense maybe being more multiple we can get some of these guys on the edge and disrupt some passing lanes. We will see what kind of speed they have. I’m not anticipating this defense to stop a lot of short yardage situations. I hope to be wrong. As long we can stay out of those situation and get TO’s, we will all be happy.


I'm sure they'll mix him up. Also, from what's been said this defense will have a healthy amount of blitzing from the LBs. They have some pieces for sure to really make some plays. The dline will attack a gap instead of holding one and it should free up lanes for the LBs. When the opposing offense makes mistakes, you'll have ballhawks and playmakers like Scott, Bailey, Hankins, Clarke, etc.
 
#120      
Would love to add Bowen, odds are no. I was looking at some measurables on the roster and noticed we have some tall LB’s and Beerman being one of them. It had me wondering/nervous, but I think with the new defense maybe being more multiple we can get some of these guys on the edge and disrupt some passing lanes. We will see what kind of speed they have. I’m not anticipating this defense to stop a lot of short yardage situations. I hope to be wrong. As long we can stay out of those situation and get TO’s, we will all be happy.

I can see Grant growing into a de. If I were him I would want to play te or de
 
#121      
I'm sure they'll mix him up. Also, from what's been said this defense will have a healthy amount of blitzing from the LBs. They have some pieces for sure to really make some plays. The dline will attack a gap instead of holding one and it should free up lanes for the LBs. When the opposing offense makes mistakes, you'll have ballhawks and playmakers like Scott, Bailey, Hankins, Clarke, etc.

Wouldn't that be grand. I'll believe it when I see it.
 
#122      
I can see Grant growing into a de. If I were him I would want to play te or de
what position does he want to play and that would be my sell. Kid looks like a baller. You know the best on this one. He obviously can and will fill out more, but you think he’ll be big enough on the DE. Looks like a perfect MLB to me.

And was it just me, but those boys were hitting for only having shells on?
 
Back