Did you notice how little teams pressed Mirk? Just seemed like the guards got pressed quite a bit but once the ball was in Mirk’s hands, they sagged off.I like this take, but remain cautious. Our big guards can distribute and run the offense fine, but people are going to press us. BAM was effective against that, he bodied people out well while also handling the ball while accelerating.
I like this take, but remain cautious. Our big guards can distribute and run the offense fine, but people are going to press us. BAM was effective against that, he bodied people out well while also handling the ball while accelerating.
Did you notice how little teams pressed Mirk? Just seemed like the guards got pressed quite a bit but once the ball was in Mirk’s hands, they sagged off.
I would say if you're looking at it according to roles then this is correct.It’s not Coleman and Keaton. It’s Coleman and Boswell.
It’s Vaaks and Keaton.
That's already in my closet.
Responding to my own post (which, I think, is a penalty box violation), LvilleILL1 just yesterday posted this about Vaaks: Better than expected. He's not going to be elite on that end, but he is passable. Effort has been good.About a month or so ago, didn’t one of the insiders say they (presumably the coaches) think Vaaks looks better defensively than they thought he would? Or something like that. Or was I just hallucinating again?
But but but…. Point guard!!!
You mean to tell me basketball is about 5 guys working together to put a ball through a hoop and stopping the other team from doing the same? It doesn’t even matter what name you give these players? This is fascinating!
Good observation. But here are my perceived reasons.Did you notice how little teams pressed Mirk? Just seemed like the guards got pressed quite a bit but once the ball was in Mirk’s hands, they sagged off.
Well, there goes the season. We all know that no team can win a game without a point guard. The season is done.
We are positionless and also not positionless at the same time.Well, there goes the season. We all know that no team can win a game without a point guard. The season is done.
And said point guard has to be under 6'2"tall or he is worthless. (OK....up to 6'4" maybe...but not an inch more.) No wonder BU can't win a title with all those 6'6" point guards. So that definitively proves my point!!
The truth is, I love the idea of a positionless team makeup....as long as they all can knock down triples at 35%+. So get your game up to snuff AS!
Shroedinger's IlliniWe are positionless and also not positionless at the same time.
Vaaks is the point guard / primary ball hander the same way Keaton was last year. The same way KJ was the year before.
He’s just too tall for some people’s liking, but that’s really not the staff’s problem. They’ll recruit the guys that give us the best chance to win.
Not sure I’d trust them as an intel source, but perhaps good to hear their analysis and predictions.These guys seem very high on Williams at 44:15
Though I have no idea if they know anything at all (and probably have lots of in-the-state bias).
Agree that Vaaks is the PG - people arguing otherwise haven't watched him play. IMO he's literally the perfect fit for what we want out of our PG (at least offensively - and defensively he usually won't be defending the opponent's PG).We are positionless and also not positionless at the same time.
Vaaks is the point guard / primary ball hander the same way Keaton was last year. The same way KJ was the year before.
He’s just too tall for some people’s liking, but that’s really not the staff’s problem. They’ll recruit the guys that give us the best chance to win.
It all comes down to whether we actually observe the positions.Shroedinger's Illini
Mizzou playing 3 games in 5 days in 3 different stadiums 12/18 at Indiana, 12/20 Braggin Rights in STL, and the 12/22 vs Chicago State at Home. That's some crazy scheduling. Even if the Chicago State game is a easy game, they are going to be struggling that week.
![]()
I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. People put far too much stock in rankings IMO.Yeah, I dont see it.
Morillo is our projected 8th man. If those guys were that good, then the rankings gap between them and Morillo wouldn't be 100-150 spots. That's a very sizeable difference (again, Wagler was the exception).
The top 8 is the top 8.
Whether one of those guys can be the 9th man and provide 5-10 minutes, would be my question.