David Mirkovic suffers left foot injury

#226      
Mirk is going to apply the same level of tenacity to getting back as he was to working hard this summer.

Sometimes when you have these injuries, guys don't work as hard as they need to.

I would not be shocked if Mirk beats the timeline even more than expected, we are talking about a guy who would die before missing games.
IMB_xANtZi.png
 
#227      
It's not though.

Shannon was at 27.9%.
Keaton was at 25.7%.
Ayo was at 29.4%.
Kofi was at 30.7%.

So Kofi's our only star that's hit 30%. If Mirk was as good as the hype, he definitely could've gotten near that, so that's not what I'm arguing.

But 23 usage and 30 usage is a very significant difference. (AJ Dybantsa led the P5 at 33.5 last year)

I literally posted what he’d need to get: a couple more shot attempts, raise the FT rate a little, and another half a turnover. That’s it.
 
#228      
It's not though.

Shannon was at 27.9%.
Keaton was at 25.7%.
Ayo was at 29.4%.
Kofi was at 30.7%.

So Kofi's our only star that's hit 30%. If Mirk was as good as the hype, he definitely could've gotten near that, so that's not what I'm arguing.

But 23 usage and 30 usage is a very significant difference. (AJ Dybantsa led the P5 at 33.5 last year)
especially when I expect mirk to pass a lot to set up plays
 
#230      
Really think the path to NPOY or 1stAA for Mirk is being awesome on an awesome team. I'm actually fairly impressed the national audience by and large seems to understand the value in his unique game - sure he does get very impressive counting stats, but his value as a connector is so much deeper.

That said, his defensive leap last year towards the end is what will truly separate him. I actually think he can be a very above average defender. Outside of the UCONN "wow" plays on blocks, he was so good against Iowa. This is actually one of my favorite moments all year, from any Illini - that is perfect help side on a big (and good) driver in Banks, getting out to a guy from 3 who was about as confident as could be, staying in the play, walling up, and two hand block and really probably deserved credit for the rebound.

ay8k82.gif
 
#231      
I literally posted what he’d need to get: a couple more shot attempts, raise the FT rate a little, and another half a turnover. That’s it.
I mean sure, but 23 usage and 30 usage is a very big difference.

Mirkovic was 3rd on Illinois's team last year with 23.3 usage. Everything revolved around Wagler, and he was only at 25.7. Highest on the team, but nowhere close to 30.

The B10 only had 1 player at 30 or higher last year (Nick Boyd at 30.1).

So, 23.3% and 30% are really not comparable.
 
#232      
Mirk is going to apply the same level of tenacity to getting back as he was to working hard this summer.

Sometimes when you have these injuries, guys don't work as hard as they need to.

I would not be shocked if Mirk beats the timeline even more than expected, we are talking about a guy who would die before missing games.

that's a given. but what about his foot bones? are they on the same page?
 
#233      
Mirk is going to apply the same level of tenacity to getting back as he was to working hard this summer.

Sometimes when you have these injuries, guys don't work as hard as they need to.

I would not be shocked if Mirk beats the timeline even more than expected, we are talking about a guy who would die before missing games.
Thank you. You (and the other insiders) are a primary reason I went from lurker to participant. Collectively you guys are the best out there.
 
#235      
I mean sure, but 23 usage and 30 usage is a very big difference.

Mirkovic was 3rd on Illinois's team last year with 23.3 usage. Everything revolved around Wagler, and he was only at 25.7. Highest on the team, but nowhere close to 30.

The B10 only had 1 player at 30 or higher last year (Nick Boyd at 30.1).

So, 23.3% and 30% are really not comparable.

I didn’t say they were comparable, I said his stats wouldn’t have to increase that much. Go do the math. There are online calculators that can do this for you.

You literally posted yourself that weve had 3 guys do it just recently. Kofi 30.7, Ayo 29.5, TSJ 29.2 were all right at 30. Totally doable to get there with a couple more shot attempts, add a bit to FT rate, and another half a turnover.

1786024371443.png
 
Last edited:
#236      
I didn’t say they were comparable, I said his stats wouldn’t have to increase that much. Go do the math. There are online calculators that can do this for you.

You literally posted yourself that weve had 3 guys do it just recently. Kofi 30.7, Ayo 29.5, TSJ 29.2 were all right at 30. Totally doable to get there with a couple more shot attempts, add a bit to FT rate, and another half a turnover.

View attachment 51102

Ran out of time to edit. At times we've had multiple players hit right at 30% in a single season:

2021-22: Cockburn 32%, Curbelo 31%
2020-21: Ayo 30%, Kofi 29%
 
#237      
Ran out of time to edit. At times we've had multiple players hit right at 30% in a single season:

2021-22: Cockburn 32%, Curbelo 31%
2020-21: Ayo 30%, Kofi 29%
Here’s a fun stat for you, to add another layer to this. The last time a team had a KenPom “Go-to-guy” and won a championship was UConn with Shabazz Napier in 2014. Since then, there hasn't been a Championship team with a guy with usage >28%. Below is how the categories are set up in KenPom:
  • Go-to-guy: >28% of possessions used (2022 Kofi, Edey, Dybantsa, etc.)
  • Major Contributors: >24-28% of possessions used (Keaton this year was at 25.5%. Michigan’s highest usage player this year was Mara at 23.7%)
  • Significant Contributors: 20-24% of possessions used (this year: Mirk, Bam, Stoj)
  • Role Players: 16-20% of possessions used (this year: Tomi at 19.7% and Z at 16.0%)
  • Limited roles: 12-16% of possessions used (2025 Humrichous and Jake Davis)
  • Nearly Invisible: <12% of possessions used (2026 Humrichous and Jake Davis)
If you go back and look at Champions over the past 10 years, you’ll find that most Champion rosters had a majority of players falling into the Significant Contributors to Role Players range (5-8 players on the roster fall within these usage rates). The average usage for the highest-used player over the past 10 years (not including COVID) for Championship teams was 25.1%, with the highest-used player for a championship team at 26.9% with Jared Butler for Baylor in 2021.

So this begs the question: Do we want any of our players to be high-usage, NPOY-stat guys, or do we want a team full of significant contributors and role players?
 
#238      
Here’s a fun stat for you, to add another layer to this. The last time a team had a KenPom “Go-to-guy” and won a championship was UConn with Shabazz Napier in 2014. Since then, there hasn't been a Championship team with a guy with usage >28%. Below is how the categories are set up in KenPom:
  • Go-to-guy: >28% of possessions used (2022 Kofi, Edey, Dybantsa, etc.)
  • Major Contributors: >24-28% of possessions used (Keaton this year was at 25.5%. Michigan’s highest usage player this year was Mara at 23.7%)
  • Significant Contributors: 20-24% of possessions used (this year: Mirk, Bam, Stoj)
  • Role Players: 16-20% of possessions used (this year: Tomi at 19.7% and Z at 16.0%)
  • Limited roles: 12-16% of possessions used (2025 Humrichous and Jake Davis)
  • Nearly Invisible: <12% of possessions used (2026 Humrichous and Jake Davis)
If you go back and look at Champions over the past 10 years, you’ll find that most Champion rosters had a majority of players falling into the Significant Contributors to Role Players range (5-8 players on the roster fall within these usage rates). The average usage for the highest-used player over the past 10 years (not including COVID) for Championship teams was 25.1%, with the highest-used player for a championship team at 26.9% with Jared Butler for Baylor in 2021.

So this begs the question: Do we want any of our players to be high-usage, NPOY-stat guys, or do we want a team full of significant contributors and role players?

I think we definitely want the latter.

The real argument against a 30% USG rate being achievable for Mirkovic is what you say (we have Andrej & Stefan) and much less so that he couldn't increase his FGA, FTA, TOV.

30% is indeed a big step up from 23%, but given the talk about Mirkovic this summer and the fact that we've had players achieve that # 5-6x over the last 5 years or so, it seems... not unreasonable that he could add a couple shot attempts, increase the FT rate, and maybe another 1/2 turnover due to facilitating more.

Also, as an aside since I've mentioned FT rate: its a huge area where Mirkovic can improve. About 42% of his shots were 3 pointers last year. I want to see more possessions this season where he gets the ball as deep as possible, use his size to score or his ability to pass out of the digs and traps when those come.

Kofi and TSJ had FT rates that nearly doubled Mirkovic's .305 rate last season:

Kofi .589
TSJ . 599

Ayo was at .333 his senior year, which is wild... I remember him getting to the line more often than that for some reason.
 
#239      
Every winner's usage from 2016 to 2026:

2026 Boozer: 30.6
2025 Flagg: 30.8
2024 Edey: 33.4
2023 Edey: 32.6
2022 Oscar: 24.8
2021 Garza: 30.4
2020 Toppin: 26.2
2019 Zion: 28.2
2018 Brunson: 26.1
2017 Mason: 25.5
2016 Heild: 28.4

(per Torvik)
Yeah I looked at the wrong year for Tshiebwe, and went off sports reference, not torvik (SR has his usage for NOPY season at 24.1%). In any event, the point still stands. Half these guys didn't hit 30%.
 
#240      
Do we know what happened to his foot? Obvi speculative, but is there a component of his running mechanics that is at play in the injury? He has such a unique prancing type of jog up the court, wondering whether this is putting more strain/impact on his feet than other high level athletes. Wishing him all the best and can't wait to see him back this year.
 
#241      
Mirk is going to apply the same level of tenacity to getting back as he was to working hard this summer.

Sometimes when you have these injuries, guys don't work as hard as they need to.

I would not be shocked if Mirk beats the timeline even more than expected, we are talking about a guy who would die before missing games.

I have no doubt he will work hard to get back where he needs to be... However, Even if starts playing again in November again based on an optimistic timetable, I am concerned that it will take a lot longer to get back to the same level he was playing at prior to injury.

As an example, look at Boswell pre and post injury stats. While his points and rebounds stayed similar, Boswell efficiency really fell off (see below). While I am not claiming that Mirk will have the same trajectory as Boswell coming back from injury (....I know they're different injuries), it would not surprise me, if Mirk may not be 100% for several months after he's reinserted in the Illini rotation again

Kylan Boswell

PeriodPointsReboundsAssistsNotes
Before injury12.3 PPG4.0 RPG3.0 APGStrong scoring; consistent usage
After return (Feb 15–Mar 8)~10.5 PPG~4.0 RPG~3.5 APGSolid but slightly reduced scoring
Postseason7.8 PPG3.8 RPG1.6 APGNoticeable scoring drop


PeriodFG%3P%FT%eFG%TS%Notes
Before injury~48%~33–34%~78–80%~55%~59%Efficient, strong finishing, stable 3P
After return~41%~26%~67–75%~47%~52%Lower rhythm, reduced 3P accuracy
 
#242      
I have no doubt he will work hard to get back where he needs to be... However, Even if starts playing again in November again based on an optimistic timetable, I am concerned that it will take a lot longer to get back to the same level he was playing at prior to injury.

As an example, look at Boswell pre and post injury stats. While his points and rebounds stayed similar, Boswell efficiency really fell off (see below). While I am not claiming that Mirk will have the same trajectory as Boswell coming back from injury (....I know they're different injuries), it would not surprise me, if Mirk may not be 100% for several months after he's reinserted in the Illini rotation again

Kylan Boswell

PeriodPointsReboundsAssistsNotes
Before injury12.3 PPG4.0 RPG3.0 APGStrong scoring; consistent usage
After return (Feb 15–Mar 8)~10.5 PPG~4.0 RPG~3.5 APGSolid but slightly reduced scoring
Postseason7.8 PPG3.8 RPG1.6 APGNoticeable scoring drop


PeriodFG%3P%FT%eFG%TS%Notes
Before injury~48%~33–34%~78–80%~55%~59%Efficient, strong finishing, stable 3P
After return~41%~26%~67–75%~47%~52%Lower rhythm, reduced 3P accuracy
Couple things I look at:

1) Mirk looks like one of the hardest workers on the team. Dude will come back with a vengeance to benefit himself and the team. Re: “I’d probably kill myself if we lost and I wasn’t playing.”
2) Mirk even at 85-90% (for a while; until fully ramped by Conference play) makes us deadly.

What he needs most is to be medically ready, as in no risk of further injury. Which by the sound of “full recovery” leads me to believe they know this will not be a lingering soft tissue type thing. It will not impact him so long as he gives himself the time to heal. But ultimately once that is set, he’s not at risk for aggravating it or anything worse, the team can use absolutely use him and only improve game over game. It seems realistic that he could be 100% decently early still in the season. Great, it’s a long season and come March and April, he’ll be a dawg again.
 
#243      
I have no doubt he will work hard to get back where he needs to be... However, Even if starts playing again in November again based on an optimistic timetable, I am concerned that it will take a lot longer to get back to the same level he was playing at prior to injury.

As an example, look at Boswell pre and post injury stats. While his points and rebounds stayed similar, Boswell efficiency really fell off (see below). While I am not claiming that Mirk will have the same trajectory as Boswell coming back from injury (....I know they're different injuries), it would not surprise me, if Mirk may not be 100% for several months after he's reinserted in the Illini rotation again

Kylan Boswell

PeriodPointsReboundsAssistsNotes
Before injury12.3 PPG4.0 RPG3.0 APGStrong scoring; consistent usage
After return (Feb 15–Mar 8)~10.5 PPG~4.0 RPG~3.5 APGSolid but slightly reduced scoring
Postseason7.8 PPG3.8 RPG1.6 APGNoticeable scoring drop


PeriodFG%3P%FT%eFG%TS%Notes
Before injury~48%~33–34%~78–80%~55%~59%Efficient, strong finishing, stable 3P
After return~41%~26%~67–75%~47%~52%Lower rhythm, reduced 3P accuracy

A broken hand is way different than a broken foot. We've seen in two consecutive seasons players get hand injuries (KJ, Kylan) and the shooting was worse after they returned (with the hand/wrist in a wrap). That's pretty obvious, I think.

A better comp might be Goode before and after his foot injury? Genuinely asking, because that still might not be the best comp because they do vastly different things on the basketball court.
 
#244      
The real argument against a 30% USG rate being achievable for Mirkovic is what you say (we have Andrej & Stefan) and much less so that he couldn't increase his FGA, FTA, TOV.
The argument I'm making isn't necessarily about achievability (totally agree with you when you factor in Drej and Stef), but more so about whether we want our offense to depend that much on one guy. It seems like it's pretty difficult to go on a deep run when that much of your offense depends on one guy, and a much more sustainable model is to have a team of contributors and role players.
 
#245      
Good call! (I attended Spamalot just 4 days ago, btw.)
Not to derail the thread, but...i'm a huge Monty Python fan. Saw spamalot back in 2007, treat from my then girlfriend. She got pissed b/c i was laughing before the punch lines/ funniest parts b/c i knew what was coming. Probably one of my favorite musicals
 
#246      
I have no doubt he will work hard to get back where he needs to be... However, Even if starts playing again in November again based on an optimistic timetable, I am concerned that it will take a lot longer to get back to the same level he was playing at prior to injury.

As an example, look at Boswell pre and post injury stats. While his points and rebounds stayed similar, Boswell efficiency really fell off (see below). While I am not claiming that Mirk will have the same trajectory as Boswell coming back from injury (....I know they're different injuries), it would not surprise me, if Mirk may not be 100% for several months after he's reinserted in the Illini rotation again

Kylan Boswell

PeriodPointsReboundsAssistsNotes
Before injury12.3 PPG4.0 RPG3.0 APGStrong scoring; consistent usage
After return (Feb 15–Mar 8)~10.5 PPG~4.0 RPG~3.5 APGSolid but slightly reduced scoring
Postseason7.8 PPG3.8 RPG1.6 APGNoticeable scoring drop


PeriodFG%3P%FT%eFG%TS%Notes
Before injury~48%~33–34%~78–80%~55%~59%Efficient, strong finishing, stable 3P
After return~41%~26%~67–75%~47%~52%Lower rhythm, reduced 3P accuracy
This is really interesting. I tried to look at other possible reasons (stats padding in the non-conference, etc.) and the only other thing I could find that could be considered a major factor for this is the emergence of new guys (Wagler, Mirk, Stoj, etc.). I think the FG% is the most telling drop in performance pre- and post-injury.

Thankfully timing is somewhat fortunate in this case, as he isn't making a mid-season return. I think a better comp might be Stoj or Tomi last year. Stoj was able to bounce back and make a major impact early, and Tomi took longer to get into rhythm. With that said, Tomi's role/usage changed YOY, which also probably factors into his slow start.
 
#248      
A broken hand is way different than a broken foot. We've seen in two consecutive seasons players get hand injuries (KJ, Kylan) and the shooting was worse after they returned (with the hand/wrist in a wrap). That's pretty obvious, I think.

A better comp might be Goode before and after his foot injury? Genuinely asking, because that still might not be the best comp because they do vastly different things on the basketball court.


I don't know is its a fair comparison since Goode got injured after his freshman year but, unlike Mirk, barely played as freshman..In addition, Goode was not considered an elite player going into his sophomore season and his sophomore stats were underwhelming to say the least ...but here you go..


SeasonGamesMinutesPointsReboundsFG%3P%eFG%Notes
2021–22 (Freshman)288.2 MPG2.0 PPG1.8 RPG32.7%37.2%~48%Full season, healthy
2022–23 (Post‑injury only)1014.5 MPG4.0 PPG1.6 RPG48.4%42.1%61.3%Returned Feb 11 after broken foot
 
#250      
I have no doubt he will work hard to get back where he needs to be... However, Even if starts playing again in November again based on an optimistic timetable, I am concerned that it will take a lot longer to get back to the same level he was playing at prior to injury.

As an example, look at Boswell pre and post injury stats. While his points and rebounds stayed similar, Boswell efficiency really fell off (see below). While I am not claiming that Mirk will have the same trajectory as Boswell coming back from injury (....I know they're different injuries), it would not surprise me, if Mirk may not be 100% for several months after he's reinserted in the Illini rotation again

Kylan Boswell

PeriodPointsReboundsAssistsNotes
Before injury12.3 PPG4.0 RPG3.0 APGStrong scoring; consistent usage
After return (Feb 15–Mar 8)~10.5 PPG~4.0 RPG~3.5 APGSolid but slightly reduced scoring
Postseason7.8 PPG3.8 RPG1.6 APGNoticeable scoring drop


PeriodFG%3P%FT%eFG%TS%Notes
Before injury~48%~33–34%~78–80%~55%~59%Efficient, strong finishing, stable 3P
After return~41%~26%~67–75%~47%~52%Lower rhythm, reduced 3P accuracy
I think it’s reasonable to think/expect Mirk to post numbers that are worse than if he hadn’t gotten injured, but a wrist injury that required special wrapping is an unfair comparison to a foot injury.

But again, completely realistic to believe Mirk will not be the same player he would have been without injury. At least for some period of time.
 
Back