sacraig
- The desert
But that's only +6.75 points per degree, whereas we are +13.33 points per degree over them. So we win.The Sylvester Criterion
That's... three degrees? In four degrees, Gonzaga +14 > TTech +5 > Tennessee +4 > Arizona +4 > Illinois![]()
But that's only +6.75 points per degree, whereas we are +13.33 points per degree over them. So we win.The Sylvester Criterion
That's... three degrees? In four degrees, Gonzaga +14 > TTech +5 > Tennessee +4 > Arizona +4 > Illinois![]()
I just dont get why any of you wouldn't want us ranked. Dont we all want to feel like we did in 89? 2005?I wish we would keep winning AND be kept out of the AP25.
I just dont get why any of you wouldn't want us ranked. Dont we all want to feel like we did in 89? 2005?
I want us to be THAT team again. I want to be number 1 all year long and kick everyone's tail. I want the O&B considered a blueblood by the time my son gets to be my age and spends his nights reading posts of other insane fans.
Sorry, just speaking my mind.
Hey, pruman.......with ya tonight my friend!
Well, if you are like me and you want us to have the highest ranking possible when a top 10 Purdue team comes to town next Monday, you will be cheering for us to (of course) win our game at Nebraska and possibly vs. Michigan, along with these somewhat realistic upsets:
Tomorrow
- #23 Providence loses at Creighton
- #4 Auburn wins at #24 Alabama Tuesday
Thursday
- #20 Seton Hall loses at DePaul
- Oklahoma State wins at #19 Texas Tech
Saturday
- #22 Tennessee loses at #18 Kentucky ... this one could go either way, honestly, but I know the pollsters love them some UK overhype, and Tennessee would probably drop out with another bad loss.
- #20 Seton Hall loses at Marquette (this helps us double!)
- #21 Texas loses at #15 Iowa State
- #24 Alabama loses at Mississippi State
Clearly the voters don't support the transitive property of mathmatics (if a > b and b > c, then a > c). Illini placed behind Alabama who just lost at Mizzou, who the Illini defeated by 25 points.
Exactly where I'm at. We're obviously all very biased. We haven't beaten anyone of consequence yet. Our top 25 ranking is more of what some voters believe they are vs what they've actually accomplished. Once we start beating the better teams(assuming we will)....the ranking will be earned and adjusted accordingly.When I look at our ranking I can't get too upset. We've only played one top 25 team so far (and lost), and our other 2 losses were to teams in the KenPom 50-75 range. 5 of our 11 wins are against bad teams.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is shaping up to be a really, really good season, but Illinois hasn't really shown much to the rest of the country. Yet.
Agreed...given our performance so far we can't criticize at all. Losing to Marquette and getting blown out by Cincy really put us in a hole. Losing to Arizona was respectable, especially by only 4 points, but the other two really hurt. If we keep winning and beat teams like Purdue, MSU, OSU, then the ranking will come. It just matters where you are at come the end of the year heading into The Dance.Exactly where I'm at. We're obviously all very biased. We haven't beaten anyone of consequence yet. Our top 25 ranking is more of what some voters believe they are vs what they've actually accomplished. Once we start beating the better teams(assuming we will)....the ranking will be earned and adjusted accordingly.
I think that’s a fair way to look at it, but there are two alternatives:When I look at our ranking I can't get too upset. We've only played one top 25 team so far (and lost), and our other 2 losses were to teams in the KenPom 50-75 range. 5 of our 11 wins are against bad teams.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is shaping up to be a really, really good season, but Illinois hasn't really shown much to the rest of the country. Yet.
I couldn't possibly care less about being "considered a blue blood". I want to win. And it's just easier to win when you're outside the top 25. This team performs better outside of the top 25. All I said was I wish we could keep on winning and stay off the list. Of course those things are almost certainly mutually exclusive.I just dont get why any of you wouldn't want us ranked. Dont we all want to feel like we did in 89? 2005?
I want us to be THAT team again. I want to be number 1 all year long and kick everyone's tail. I want the O&B considered a blueblood by the time my son gets to be my age and spends his nights reading posts of other insane fans.
Sorry, just speaking my mind.
Hey, pruman.......with ya tonight my friend!
I'd love to see the statistical analysis that supports this correlation.I couldn't possibly care less about being "considered a blue blood". I want to win. And it's just easier to win when you're outside the top 25. This team performs better outside of the top 25. All I said was I wish we could keep on winning and stay off the list. Of course those things are almost certainly mutually exclusive.
The ranking isn't why we lost to Marquette (no Kofi) or Cincy. Our lack of ranking isn't why we've been playing well. It wasn't a voodoo curse of a number by our name. We needed time to figure out how to overcome our injuries and absences.I couldn't possibly care less about being "considered a blue blood". I want to win. And it's just easier to win when you're outside the top 25. This team performs better outside of the top 25. All I said was I wish we could keep on winning and stay off the list. Of course those things are almost certainly mutually exclusive.
Yes, but besides Mizzou, Bama has also lost to Davidson, Iona, and Memphis.It's kind of easy to look at Alabama' s loss to Mizzou and say we should be ranked above them, but they have also beaten Gonzaga, Houston and Tennessee. Not saying they're better than us. I think we are better. Just saying it's not ridiculous for a voter to vote them ahead of us right now based on those wins, when we haven't beaten anyone of that caliber yet. I'm confident our AP ranking will look more like our efficieny based rankings as we play tougher competition (hopefully because the AP ranking corrects and not the other way around).
I couldn't possibly care less about being "considered a blue blood". I want to win. And it's just easier to win when you're outside the top 25. This team performs better outside of the top 25. All I said was I wish we could keep on winning and stay off the list. Of course those things are almost certainly mutually exclusive.
I'd love to see the statistical analysis that supports this correlation.
Why did we play so well last year ranked inside the top 10 the entire year?I couldn't possibly care less about being "considered a blue blood". I want to win. And it's just easier to win when you're outside the top 25. This team performs better outside of the top 25. All I said was I wish we could keep on winning and stay off the list. Of course those things are almost certainly mutually exclusive.