2017 Coaching Carousel

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2,926      
I dunno, I feel like a map can tell you. ;)

It's 49 miles difference. 127 vs 176.

No way does 45 minutes of drive time to his mom's house make the difference here.
I agree it likely won't. Just trying to make the pitch. It's also a little more than that. I talked about it earlier but he gave an interview earlier in the year where he said he enjoyed Missouri State the most.....while he's currently the Cal basketball coach. That was pretty telling to me. If the money could be equal and for whatever reason he liked the Mizzou culture better it would only mildly surprise me to see him go with them. That Tennessee job really really cut deep with him.
 
#2,927      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
I agree it likely won't. Just trying to make the pitch. It's also a little more than that. I talked about it earlier but he gave an interview earlier in the year where he said he enjoyed Missouri State the most.....while he's currently the Cal basketball coach. That was pretty telling to me. If the money could be equal and for whatever reason he liked the Mizzou culture better it would only mildly surprise me to see him go with them. That Tennessee job really really cut deep with him.

Ever been to Knoxville? On top of that, he had the pleasure of following Pearl, who UT fans still think walks on water.
 
#2,928      

radiodj

Houston
I get the sense that the average Joe Sixpack Illini fan has the idea that Groce is sort of a rah-rah recruiter who either a little or totally overmatched in terms of his knowledge of the X's and O's of basketball, depending on whether we won or lost the previous game.

That's a college coach archetype everyone knows. But it doesn't fit Groce well at all.

He eats, sleeps, and breathes basketball. So much so that he's tough to keep up with, even for his staff and players.

I'm sorry, I have a hard time believing that this team looks as poorly coached as it does because he's too brilliant of a basketball mind.
 
#2,930      
So, a couple of NBA options that spring to mind:

Scott Skiles - Big Ten background as a player at Michigan State. He's probably done as an NBA head coach, at least for awhile. He's renowned as a guy who can develop and motivate young players. He's pitch-perfect as an NBA coach who you'd pick to be a college coach, though some of that has to do with him being a bit of a tyrant. You'd like him as the coach, but with his reputation as a tough guy to play for, would he be able to get players?

Monty Williams - Former New Orleans Pelicans Head Coach. He was absolutely beloved there and a great mentor to a young, talented team. They played together and they played hard. He doesn't have any college coaching experience but he definitely profiles as someone players would want to play for. He was chosen as an assistant on the US Olympic Team (Coach K, Boeheim, Thibs and Monty was the staff), so he's definitely someone Jerry Colangelo likes. Smart NBA people weren't in love with his coaching ability with the Hornets, but they've gotten worse with the same roster under Alvin Gentry who everyone loves, so who knows. Played at Notre Dame so there's a Midwest connection.

Lawrence Frank - Former Nets and Pistons head coach who is known as an X's and O's wizard. Was a student manager for Bobby Knight at Indiana and then an assistant to Kevin O'Neill at Marquette and Tennessee before getting into the pro game. Like Skiles, another coaches coach who got a reputation as a bit too much of a tyrant for the pro game. He's moved into the front office with the Clippers now, maybe that's the direction he wants his career to go.

Lawrence Frank's X's and O's are up there with the best of em.
 
#2,931      
Curious, any names out their of guys who were at least moderately successful in the NBA with little college experience that came to the college level and were successful? Can't think of any that didn't at least have some decent college HC experience.

Larry Brown and Paul Westhead spring to mind. But yeah, there tends to be less crossover between the NBA and college than between the NFL and college.

I would say though, NBA and college basketball are closer today than they were 10-15 years ago both in terms of tactics and strategy and relationships with players.

You look at Monty Williams' Pelicans teams, those were a bunch of guys that would still have had college eligibility if they had chosen to. They grew up under him in a way they would have done under a Lou Henson or a John Wooden a generation ago.

Still, stuff like the Eddie Jordan Rutgers era scares you.
 
#2,932      
A lot of folks talking about Bennett from UVA. A lot of people talking about Groce's poor defensive scheme. They both run the pack-line.

Obviously, Bennett has had more success with it. I'd be happy with a Bennett hire, and I don't particularly care for the pack-line defense.

Just throwing out some thoughts.
 
#2,933      

radiodj

Houston
It's not what you know, it's what you can teach.

We don't look simplistic, we look lost. And with experienced, smart kids.

Albert Einstein said that if you can't explain something simply enough for others to understand, then you don't know it well enough.
 
#2,934      

Tevo

Wilmette, IL
I get the sense that the average Joe Sixpack Illini fan has the idea that Groce is sort of a rah-rah recruiter who either a little or totally overmatched in terms of his knowledge of the X's and O's of basketball, depending on whether we won or lost the previous game.

That's a college coach archetype everyone knows. But it doesn't fit Groce well at all.

He eats, sleeps, and breathes basketball. So much so that he's tough to keep up with, even for his staff and players.

This is the difference between and expert and a teacher, and you can see it all over the place. Just because someone can develop a Nobel Prize-winning economic theory doesn't mean she'll be a good professor. Just because a guy can develop a winning strategy for an army doesn't mean he should be leading the troops. Frankly, this is why you have a whole coaching STAFF. You need a blend of recruiters, strategists, analysts and teachers. They are all important, and we clearly are lacking in at least one -- perhaps it's the teaching that we're missing.
 
#2,935      
Albert Einstein said that if you can't explain something simply enough for others to understand, then you don't know it well enough.

That's a good line, but the truth is pretty much every coach in Division I basketball is watering down their own basketball knowledge to make it digestible for their players. The coaches are adult basketball lifers and the kids are 19-20, often from poor educational backgrounds, of course it's that way.
 
#2,936      
A lot of folks talking about Bennett from UVA. A lot of people talking about Groce's poor defensive scheme. They both run the pack-line.

The scheme isn't wrong, the execution is wrong.

Pack line is great. It takes advantage of college rules allowing defensive 3 seconds within a man-to-man concept.

But any system is only as good as how well you run it.
 
#2,937      
Larry Brown and Paul Westhead spring to mind. But yeah, there tends to be less crossover between the NBA and college than between the NFL and college.

There are a lot more coaching positions in football, at assistant levels, so really makes the crossover a lot easier.

Brown actually started his coaching career in college as an assistant to Dean Smith, before resuming his playing career in the newly founded ABA that was starving for players. The Denver Nuggets were his first head coaching job, although that started in the ABA (before they merged into the NBA). He also did coach in college early on (before Kansas), many people actually forget that he became UCLA's coach.

Paul Westhead was actually a long-time head coach in college for almost 10 years at La Salle before venturing into the NBA. He is legendary in Mid-Atlantic, a Philly guy.
 
Last edited:
#2,938      

GortTheRobot

North Bethesda, Maryland
I'm very surprised anyone would view Cuonzo as a "meh" hire. I think he would crush it in recruiting. I don't know if he would win big ten titles right away, but he would definitely right the ship.

Anyone who thinks we get Sean Miller or equivalent is delusional. I'd love to see it but given the state of the program, people need to come back to reality.

I think people mean Archie Miller, not Sean. As for Martin, the jury seems to be out about his ability to actually coach, we don't need another recruiter who can't teach the game. Maybe he can, I just don't think he moves the needle like Keatts or Archie Miller.
 
#2,939      
I think people mean Archie Miller, not Sean. As for Martin, the jury seems to be out about his ability to actually coach, we don't need another recruiter who can't teach the game. Maybe he can, I just don't think he moves the needle like Keatts or Archie Miller.
Wait, are you saying Archie is a better coach than his brother, Sean? I'm confused.
 
#2,940      
Coach K looks to be at 7.3 a year. Could we not offer a coach 6 over 5? 30 million investment not worth the possible rewards?

We're not going to pay that much. We've never paid the hoops coach more than the football coach, so that's probably your upper limit. Lovie got $21 mil over 6 years. And it's not just us, I believe IU is the only B10 school paying more for hoops than football. It's a simple case of which one brings in more $$.

I'm very surprised anyone would view Cuonzo as a "meh" hire.

Probably his meh results that bring that reaction.

A lot of folks talking about Bennett from UVA. A lot of people talking about Groce's poor defensive scheme. They both run the pack-line.

Obviously, Bennett has had more success with it. I'd be happy with a Bennett hire, and I don't particularly care for the pack-line defense.

Just throwing out some thoughts.

Well Bennett actually runs it vs talking about running it.
 
#2,941      

GortTheRobot

North Bethesda, Maryland
Wait, are you saying Archie is a better coach than his brother, Sean? I'm confused.

No, not at all. It's that the talk has been about getting Archie from Dayton. No one thinks getting Sean is even a remote possibility. If it was, it would be fantastic, he is clearly better...at least right now. Who knows what Archie could do if he came to Illinois, it's not like we haven't done well against Arizona in the past, and Lute Olsen was a pretty good coach.
 
#2,946      
They don't seem to ever be on ESPN3. Where are you watching?

They seem to have a streaming service they use for games (follow their Twitter, they provide links), and will also be checking some of my other streaming sources as well. I wouldn't expect to find them on ESPN3 too often, although I believe their game against CoC was televised(?) -- although I may be mis-remembering that. I missed it. They also have watch links on their schedule. UNCW athletics' site is basically the same as Illinois', by the way, same provider.
 
#2,947      
It's not what you know, it's what you can teach.

We don't look simplistic, we look lost. And with experienced, smart kids.

That's a good line, but the truth is pretty much every coach in Division I basketball is watering down their own basketball knowledge to make it digestible for their players. The coaches are adult basketball lifers and the kids are 19-20, often from poor educational backgrounds, of course it's that way.

These 2 statements seem to contradict your theory about what the coaches can/can't teach the players.
 
#2,948      

haasi

New York
They seem to have a streaming service they use for games (follow their Twitter, they provide links), and will also be checking some of my other streaming sources as well. I wouldn't expect to find them on ESPN3 too often, although I believe their game against CoC was televised(?) -- although I may be mis-remembering that. I missed it. They also have watch links on their schedule. UNCW athletics' site is basically the same as Illinois', by the way, same provider.

On CAA.tv. doesn't look like password required. playing james Madison tonight at 7 eastern, William and mary Saturday afternoon (also on CSN-MA)

sometimes on real TV on ASN (random network) and ESPN. here's the breakdown: http://uncwsports.com/news/2016/10/...ahawks-set-for-tv-eight-times-in-2016-17.aspx

Nov. 30, 2016 UNCW at Western Michigan ESPN3 7:00 p.m.
Dec. 10, 2016 UNCW at St. Bonaventure ASN 6:00 p.m.
Dec. 28, 2016 UNCW at Clemson ACC 7:00 p.m.
Jan. 19, 2017 UNCW at Charleston ASN 7:00 p.m.
Jan. 21, 2017 Drexel at UNCW ASN 4:00 p.m.
Jan. 28, 2017 UNCW at William & Mary CSN-MA 4:00 p.m.
Feb. 11, 2017 UNCW at Elon ASN 4:00 p.m.


Also CSN will carry conference tourney with championship game on ESPN.


On a separate note, this season is very impressive but have to note that they've played only two games against top 50 teams and they lost both (MTSU and Clemson). That said, those are their only losses, and winning on the road against College of Charleston is impressive (RPI 68 according to CBS). Keatts won't have more chances in conference to get an impressive win, so assuming UNCW finishes strong, the tourney looms huge for showing how good they are
 
#2,949      
On a separate note, this season is very impressive but have to note that they've played only two games against top 50 teams and they lost both (MTSU and Clemson). That said, those are their only losses, and winning on the road against College of Charleston is impressive (RPI 68 according to CBS). Keatts won't have more chances in conference to get an impressive win, so assuming UNCW finishes strong, the tourney looms huge for showing how good they are

Much better notes than I provided, thanks (re: watching). Regarding MTSU and Clemson losses, it's also worth noting they lost on the road to MTSU by just 5, and @ Clemson by 14 (lost by 13 in 1H, 1 in 2H for those of you into numbers like that). Tournament will definitely matter, but as you said, they only had two chances at those wins so far, and are yet again at the top of their league (where talent level is presumably fairly level). At some point, you beat the teams put in front of you and they've certainly done that. If they can win some tournament games, that'd be huge. They're definitely looking good to make it.

On another note, it's interesting to note Keatts has UNCW receiving votes in the AP poll (#29 by total votes), and receiving votes in the coaches poll (T-#26 by total votes). Pretty impressive.
 
#2,950      

Deleted member 11241

D
Guest
I have been as big of a Groce supporter as there is, but enough is enough. Barring a complete turn around and making it to the S16, it's time to move on. My biggest fear is that turn around happens and we are stuck with JG another couple years. As bad as I want to see Malcolm and these seniors make the NCAAT, that will just make it next to impossible for JW to fire him. I'm afraid the backlash we would receive, especially in coaching circles, would cause us to end up with someone worse than Groce.

I trust Whitman will make the right decision and do whatever is necessary to get the best available coach. I am starting to like Keatts, but I think we should offer top dollar to Archie Miller first. Never know unless you try. Then offer Keatts, and have Martin as option C. I think Martin is a safe option, may not have as high of a ceiling, but I also think he has a higher floor than what we have had the past 5 years.

I would also like to add, specifically for the people that think we are a completely irrelevant program and will be looking at another rebuild. I think any respectable coach we bring in could coach these players up better and at least have us competing in the upper half of conference. I think at worst within 2-3 years we could be relevant again. Also, for those that think that is impossible, I ask you to look no further than our current 2017 class. I'm not saying they are game changers that will immediately improve us. But, given the state of our program, and the fact that Groce was able to land their commitments speaks volumes about our program and also to JG as a recruiter. I mean, your talking about a Top 10-15 class, tops in the conference. When you look at the shape this program has been in, yet we are still able to land a top ranked class is amazing. Any coach could look at that alone and see this is a place where they could do great things at. Even if a coach isn't the greatest recruiter ever, all they have to do is be able to coach, win games and have a decent personality and the recruits will come
 
Status
Not open for further replies.