2017 Coaching Carousel

Status
Not open for further replies.
#8,051      
I think people are reading into it the right amount. If the decision was to keep Groce, it would be announced by today at the latest. If the decision is to move on from Groce, it's totally understandable to wait until everyone gets back to UI and you can have a face-to-face and give him time to tell his family and team before making the announcement public.

Yep, agreed. It's not weird for us not to have heard anything about Groce being fired, not one bit. It IS weird that - if Groce were to stay - we haven't heard public support from Whitman.
 
#8,052      

TownieMatt

CU Expat
Chicago
I would eat every pair of socks I own if:

1) Whitman has made the decision to retain Groce.
2) Whitman has made the decision to fire Groce and has not yet started sending out feelers.

I think JW has got this one under control, gents.

Given how quickly JW pulled off the Lovie hire, I would be very surprised if JW doesn't handle this well given the amount of time he's had to plan.
 
#8,053      

mattcoldagelli

The Transfer Portal with Do Not Contact Tag
Of the three options (now, after Selection Sunday, or after the postseason), the Sunday option seems clearly the worst to me.

The level of fecklessness of letting the selection committee and the public perception of a random, miracle, undeserved (and totally external to Groce or the actual work of the basketball program) tournament bid affect your thinking for the leadership of your program would be excoriated by the media, and rightly so.

Presumably you are only talking about if the decision is to retain?

If it is to announce a change, I think post-Selection Sunday is entirely appropriate. You do have to wait until we are officially not in the tournament to be able to fall back on things like "the way we want to measure success here is to be competing for championships in the NCAA tournament."
 
#8,055      
Heard from a source that Groce will not be coaching in the NIT and will he fired Sunday.
 
#8,056      
If it is to announce a change, I think post-Selection Sunday is entirely appropriate. You do have to wait until we are officially not in the tournament to be able to fall back on things like "the way we want to measure success here is to be competing for championships in the NCAA tournament."

Agree to disagree I guess.

Either way, I really think he'll coach in a potential NIT bid. There is not the hurry that it seems.
 
#8,057      
Heard from a source that Groce will not be coaching in the NIT and will he fired Sunday.

Any time someone says something like this, I go and look at that person's previous posts. One of this guys' is "We will lose to Rutgers"

60114268.jpg
 
#8,059      

BananaShampoo

Captain 'Paign
Phoenix, AZ
So really, the major argument I've seen over why Keatts wouldn't be a great hire is because his amazing turnaround and superior coaching record as a head coach happened in a far inferior conference and might not translate to the P5 level. But is the CAA really that inferior? If you look at conference RPI rankings going back, it's been above or right around on par with the Horizon league - a conference that until recently included some school named Butler.

See here: https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketball/rpi-ranking/rpi-rating-by-conf

Like the Horizon, it's been far from the bottom of the barrel for D-1 basketball conferences. Butler turned it's success in that conference into a springboard to the Big East, along with DePaul. Oh, and the last Horizon league coach to make the successful jump to a B1G coaching gig? Some guy named Bo Ryan, who had a similar level of success at Wisconsin-Milwaukee as Keatts has had at UNC-Wilmington (and actually, I'd argue Keatts has been even better than Bo was).
 
#8,060      
So really, the ONLY reasonable argument I've seen over why Keatts wouldn't be a great hire is because his amazing turnaround and superior coaching record as a head coach happened in a far inferior conference. But is the CAA really that inferior? If you look at conference RPI rankings going back, it's been above or right around on par with the Horizon league - a conference that until recently included some school named Butler.

See here: https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketball/rpi-ranking/rpi-rating-by-conf

Like the Horizon, it's been far from the bottom of the barrel for D-1 basketball conferences. Butler turned it's success in that conference into a springboard to the Big East, along with DePaul. Oh, and the last Horizon league coach to make the successful jump to a B1G coaching gig? Some guy named Bo Ryan, who had a similar level of success at Wisconsin-Milwaukee as Keatts has had at UNC-Wilmington (and actually, I'd argue Keatts has been even better than Bo was).

I think tenure length is the primary concern. At least it's my concern. But really, that is a minor knock on his resume.
 
#8,061      
Agree to disagree I guess.

Either way, I really think he'll coach in a potential NIT bid. There is not the hurry that it seems.

Would this be standard? I think it seems a bizarre choice...

I honestly don't know, but I remember losing to Alabama in the NIT after they fired Grant & they had an assistant coaching.
 
#8,062      

UofI08

Chicago
It IS a unicorn of a resume. Find me a comp.

I know it's already been talked about, but I think Anthony Grant is more of a comp than some realize, and I think even more of a "unicorn" type resume.

Yes, he inherited a better situation, but he took them to 3 straight outright titles. For Keatts, he took over right after the conference lost its top programs. VCU left the CAA in 2012, George Mason and Old Dominion after 2013. Losing arguably the 3 historically strongest programs from a conference can crush it.

Grant was coaching in a much stronger conference at the time. He had significantly more assistant coaching experience. His last 4 seasons at Florida he was Associate Head Coach.

He was really a great hire on paper.
 
#8,063      
Would this be standard?

Yes.

Herb Sendek coached Arizona State in the NIT two years ago and then got fired. Brian Gregory coached Georgia Tech in the NIT last year and then got fired. Billy Gillispie coached Kentucky in the NIT the year he got fired.

I'm not aware of an interim coach ever replacing a fired coach for the NIT.
 
#8,064      

sacraig

The desert
If he's committed to Groce, why would he have to come out and say it? That will be inferred when Groce is still the head coach past next week

Also keep in mind that if Groce is retained, it would require extending him to avoid hurting recruitment, so there would absolutely need to be some kind of announcement.
 
#8,065      

mattcoldagelli

The Transfer Portal with Do Not Contact Tag
If someone were to run "Operation Keep the Recruits", using the NIT as a way to signal your intent/hopes for certain assistants would be something that would cross your mind.
 
#8,067      
I know it's already been talked about, but I think Anthony Grant is more of a comp than some realize, and I think even more of a "unicorn" type resume.

Yes, he inherited a better situation, but he took them to 3 straight outright titles. For Keatts, he took over right after the conference lost its top programs. VCU left the CAA in 2012, George Mason and Old Dominion after 2013. Losing arguably the 3 historically strongest programs from a conference can crush it.

Grant was coaching in a much stronger conference at the time. He had significantly more assistant coaching experience. His last 4 seasons at Florida he was Associate Head Coach.

He was really a great hire on paper.

Grant was a great hire, I agree.

But like, this thing about the relative strength of the CAA...do you see how that doesn't fit?

What Grant and Keatts have in common is that neither one ever had to play against VCU, y'know? How do you get credit for a stronger conference when you're AT the program that's making it a stronger conference?
 
#8,068      
If someone were to run "Operation Keep the Recruits", using the NIT as a way to signal your intent/hopes for certain assistants would be something that would cross your mind.

It's not the craziest idea in the world. But gun to my head, it would not be my prediction.

Minimizing the time, and the twitter news cycles, between job opening and job closing is another big consideration that weighs in favor of Groce coaching the NIT. If there's not much you can do search-wise during the opening weekend of the NCAA's (and there's not), then don't let the public perception clock run against you during those days.
 
#8,069      
I think people are reading into it the right amount. If the decision was to keep Groce, it would be announced by today at the latest. If the decision is to move on from Groce, it's totally understandable to wait until everyone gets back to UI and you can have a face-to-face and give him time to tell his family and team before making the announcement public.

Yes. Also, there is a PR/marketing aspect to this. It would look bad to recruits and the basketball community if you canned Groce before having a professional face-to-face back in Champaign. It would look bad to have players and recruits hitting social media saying they were blindsided because Groce/Whitman didn't tell them in advance of the press disclosure. You want this to go down in a controlled, professional way if at all possible.

If you are confident you'll hire a top shelf replacement, you also want people paying attention to the transition. It will come with some bad press (jokes about how far the program has fallen), but there will also be an acknowledgment of historical relevancy. If you hire any of Archie Miller, Monty, Keatts, Larry K, Musselman, Dan Majerle, Anthony Grant, or several other names mentioned in this thread, there will be at worst a vivid discussion about whether they can bring the program back to previous heights. It will be good press overall.

The only way for this to go poorly in terms of PR is to get publicly (or semi-publicly) rejected by multiple preferred candidates, let the process drag on for 3-4 weeks while the recruiting class disintegrates, and then hire somebody like Dan Muller (who I actually think is a good coach - just wouldn't go over well). I don't think that will happen. I get the sense that Whitman is competent and detail-obsessed. I think this will be surgical.
 
#8,070      

KBLEE

Montgomery, IL
I'm still keeping my fingers crossed that Miller is a possibility. The fact that his wife already hates Northwestern is a definite plus in my book.
 
#8,071      

BananaShampoo

Captain 'Paign
Phoenix, AZ
I think tenure length is the primary concern. At least it's my concern. But really, that is a minor knock on his resume.

To counter that, again using Ryan as an example, he was only at UWM for 2 seasons before being picked to be the Wiscy head coach. Before that he was at D3 Wisconsin-Platteville for a long time. He literally only had 2 seasons of D1 coaching experience before moving on to the P5 level. Keatts has 3 years now, plus was an assistant at D1 schools Marshall and Louisville (almost as bigtime as it gets). I'd wager he's at least as ready if not more than Bo was at the time he was hired by Pat Richter, UW's AD at the time.

Oh, another guy who had only a few years of D1 coaching experience before moving on to P5, after having a lot of lower level (HS, D3, and D2) coaching experience? John Beilein.

:shield: Keatts. Train. :shield:
 
#8,072      

jmwillini

Tolono, IL
Of the three options (now, after Selection Sunday, or after the postseason), the Sunday option seems clearly the worst to me.

The level of fecklessness of letting the selection committee and the public perception of a random, miracle, undeserved (and totally external to Groce or the actual work of the basketball program) tournament bid affect your thinking for the leadership of your program would be excoriated by the media, and rightly so.

While I agree with your thoughts, what if he gave Groce his word, make the tourney and you're back? If you're a man of your word, your hopefully a man of your word. Until the Illini are definitely eliminated...
 
#8,073      
While I agree with your thoughts, what if he gave Groce his word, make the tourney and you're back? If you're a man of your word, your hopefully a man of your word. Until the Illini are definitely eliminated...

That would have been an inadvisable promise to make (what if we had won the BTT as a 14 seed or something?), but sure, I guess that makes as much sense as anything else.
 
#8,074      
To counter that, again using Ryan as an example, he was only at UWM for 2 seasons before being picked to be the Wiscy head coach. Before that he was at D3 Wisconsin-Platteville for a long time. He literally only had 2 seasons of D1 coaching experience before moving on to the P5 level. Keatts has 3 years now, plus was an assistant at D1 schools Marshall and Louisville (almost as bigtime as it gets). I'd wager he's at least as ready if not more than Bo was at the time he was hired by Pat Richter, UW's AD at the time.

Oh, another guy who had only a few years of D1 coaching experience before moving on to P5, after having a lot of lower level (HS, D3, and D2) coaching experience? John Beilein.

:shield: Keatts. Train. :shield:


This is true. But, keep in mind that most people with Bo's resume would have failed miserably. It just did not predict the success that he has had.

I'm sort of on the Keatts train. I also like Musselman and Monty. Each of them has strengths and concerns. That's OK. Just because I point out a limitation in a resume, does not mean that I don't think he is a strong candidate.
 
#8,075      

BananaShampoo

Captain 'Paign
Phoenix, AZ
That's actually inaccurate...I've seen much better arguments.

1. He's only been a head coach for 3 years.
2. He has zero recruiting ties to the Midwest or Chicago.
3. He's not a "name" that would make one confident the recruiting class would remain committed.

1. That would be wrong. He was head coach at Hargrave for a rather long time. That said, why would him being a HC for 3 years be a knock when he's obviously demonstrated a great deal of success over that 3 years already? He turned around a dumpster fire in ONE year!

2. So what? A lot of the candidates being bandied about don't have deep Midwest connections. That aspect is overrated IMO.

3. Maybe not a name, but as hashed out previously there is a good chance at least a few of them would stay, especially after meeting him. He did a very good job of recruiting as as assistant at Louisville. He has from all accounts an engaging personality, and he's AA which though it shouldn't matter almost certainly doesn't hurt. Win a lot early on and the "name" things stops mattering really quick. He'd establish his own name here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.