lstewart53x3
- Scottsdale, Arizona
Well, that’s not what you said originally, your exact quote was:The NFL.com scout opens with "Three-year starter with solid passing production relative to the lack of protection he saw in 2025" so yes, it impacted the perception of the player.
He was the #10 transfer QB when he came and a top 200 player out of HS. Would've been a top 2 QB this offseson...not like he was a diamond in the rough. Those 7,600 yards and 57 TDs in the B1G instead got him labeled as the 16th most productive QB and a game manager.
It's wild that saying "a better line and a D that put him in favorable spots would help the perception of the player" is controversial.
“Still feel like the staff let Altmyer down this year.”
Could the o-line have been better? Absolutely.
Was Altmyer responsible for a large percentage of his sacks because he held the ball too long? Unfortunately, yes.
Luke wasn’t drafted because of his size and arm strength. Not because of the o-line he played behind.
He was more productive than Drew Allar, yet Allar was drafted because of his measurables.
The staff, imo, didn’t let Altmyer down and if anything, was a huge part of his growth and development, which is why Luke stuck around his final year instead of securing more NIL elsewhere.
Last edited: