This is true, and that's why I said I understood the rationale behind adding Penn State and Nebraska, because adding more premier football matchups makes the Big Ten TV contract a better TV ratings proposition. Though of course, the historical pull is also a part of the equation, especially for the rest of the package. Iowa-Purdue is going to draw better ratings than Iowa-Maryland, even if Maryland is a marginally better team. The historical interconnectedness of the schools is why I said they are more than the sum of their parts. Illinois is worth more as a TV property playing all of its historical rivals than as a Chicago market grab for the Big 12, for example.
But what happens when Fox Sports and ESPN aren't the middlemen anymore? That day is approaching. And when sports leagues and conferences are selling their product on a subscription basis, the ones that have the most emotional pull to their brands will succeed above and beyond the raw team strength of their conferences. Jim Delany has been selling that advantage (which the Big Ten had over every other college conference) for a handful of magic beans for years now.
It's the story of so many innovators. Delany saw in 1990 where the business was going to be in 2008, and now he sees in 2018 where the business is going to be in 2008.
Not sure that this is true. With the btn2go infrastructure already in place they can easily go to a streaming network platform. The cash cow of cable subscription fees is dying quickly, but I would still say We're ahead of the game