Bowls/Playoff Selection Sunday

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
What are you talking, earned nothing?

I don’t want to be Alabama homer here, but using FPI, they beat the:

#6, #14, #18, #21, and #25 teams.

5 top 25 wins isn’t “nothing”.

Indiana, who absolutely deserves to be the 1 seed, won just 4 such games.
But…but… but… I can’t stand Alabama. That’s gotta count for something, right.
 
#78      
They played more P4 teams than any other team in FBS. They finished with a better ACC record than Miami (and Alabama!).

Alabama gets the free pass for being in the SEC.

Also, of note, the two non-P4 teams they played were 9-2 Navy and 8-4 MWC champ Boise State.

Not sure which spin I love more.

"Better ACC record than Miami" losing to Miami and going 4-0 vs Pitt, BC, Cuse, and NC State while Miami beat ND and also went 4-0 vs those common opponents

Or

"Played more P4 teams" while loading up on trash programs like BC, Stanford, Purdue, and Cuse.
 
#79      
ND does not deserve to get in. But this playoff is a joke. Bama should not be in, pick one between JMU and Tulane. BYU played a tougher schedule than both of them. Duke should be in as they won their conference championship as championship games should mean something. As much as I hate Michigan, they should be in as they played a tougher schedule than Miami.
 
#82      
By 3 points, at home, in week 1? By that logic SMU should be in over Miami, Texas in over Oklahoma, etc etc. H-2-H should be a very minor factor, not the overriding consideration.
But this is the bed ND makes with their schedule, right? If they want to be category-of-one special unicorns, they’d better beat the playoff-caliber teams, regardless of when they play them.
 
#83      
Not sure which spin I love more.

"Better ACC record than Miami" losing to Miami and going 4-0 vs Pitt, BC, Cuse, and NC State while Miami beat ND and also went 4-0 vs those common opponents

Or

"Played more P4 teams" while loading up on trash programs like BC, Stanford, Purdue, and Cuse.
Conveniently ignoring that Pitt was 6-2 in the ACC, and ND also beat #16 USC by 10 and blew out every other team they played, while Miami lost two games to ACC teams, including a middling Louisville team, and I'm the one spinning?

Can only play the teams on their schedule, and they scheduled 10 games against P4 opponents, 6 against the ACC, 2 SEC, 2 B1G, with 2 other games against Navy (who they schedule every year) and Boise State, who won the MWC and made the playoff last year. They lost two games by 4 total points in the first 2 weeks of the season.

That's why metrics exist, to take the implicit bias from the eye test out of the equation so teams can be empirically evaluated. By that evaluation, ND was a top 5 team that didn't get into a 12 team playoff, which just shouldn't happen.
 
#87      
Not sure which spin I love more.

"Better ACC record than Miami" losing to Miami and going 4-0 vs Pitt, BC, Cuse, and NC State while Miami beat ND and also went 4-0 vs those common opponents

Or

"Played more P4 teams" while loading up on trash programs like BC, Stanford, Purdue, and Cuse.
And don't forget Arkansas, the worst team in the SEC.
 
#88      
ND does not deserve to get in. But this playoff is a joke. Bama should not be in, pick one between JMU and Tulane. BYU played a tougher schedule than both of them. Duke should be in as they won their conference championship as championship games should mean something. As much as I hate Michigan, they should be in as they played a tougher schedule than Miami.
JMU and Tulane both deserve to be in, they weren't picked at random, they were two of the top 5 conference champions. That's more on the ACC for being terrible.
 
#89      
As an ND grad, this is a pretty big joke. Makes me wonder if ESPNs investments into the SEC could cause some impact on the selection.

If you have 12 teams in but somehow leave out the team with the 4th highest odds to win it all, what is the point? ND would boatrace Ole Miss, Oklahoma, Texas Tech, and Alabama without a doubt in my mind.
 
#92      
Ole Miss 41 Arkansas 35
Notre Dame 56 Arkansas 16
Tennessee 34 Arkansas 31
Texas A&M 45 Arkansas 42
LSU 23 Arkansas 22

Why can't we at least be honest about things? One of these is not like the others.
with all due respect
playing Arky as a conference rival is tougher .

and I watched Texas Tech yesterday . nfw ND boat races them .

there is a price to pay for independence. they found out today in spades
 
#93      
Ole Miss 41 Arkansas 35
Notre Dame 56 Arkansas 16
Tennessee 34 Arkansas 31
Texas A&M 45 Arkansas 42
LSU 23 Arkansas 22

Why can't we at least be honest about things? One of these is not like the others.
Arkansas got blown out by ND but they did have 365 total yards on offense. Arkansas's problems, as the scores you posted point out, they have no defense. ND should join a conference and drop Navy. This isn't 1945 when Army and Navy were top teams. If ND loses 2 games in the regular season, and their best win is over a average USC team at home, they are not getting in.
 
#94      
with all due respect
playing Arky as a conference rival is tougher .

and I watched Texas Tech yesterday . nfw ND boat races them .

there is a price to pay for independence. they found out today in spades
Are you sure ND easily beats Texas Tech? ND beat a horrible BC team by only 15 points. I do believe ND should have got in over 'Bama. I wonder if ND, being on NBC, while college football is basically controlled by ESPN (ABC), was hurt by the NBC contract?
 
#95      
Conveniently ignoring that Pitt was 6-2 in the ACC, and ND also beat #16 USC by 10 and blew out every other team they played, while Miami lost two games to ACC teams, including a middling Louisville team, and I'm the one spinning?

Can only play the teams on their schedule, and they scheduled 10 games against P4 opponents, 6 against the ACC, 2 SEC, 2 B1G, with 2 other games against Navy (who they schedule every year) and Boise State, who won the MWC and made the playoff last year. They lost two games by 4 total points in the first 2 weeks of the season.

That's why metrics exist, to take the implicit bias from the eye test out of the equation so teams can be empirically evaluated. By that evaluation, ND was a top 5 team that didn't get into a 12 team playoff, which just shouldn't happen.
My post specifically pointed out that both ND and Miami beat Pitt. And while we're there, Miami beat Pitt by a larger margin. So, If we're putting that much load bearing weight on blowing out teams, Miami beat 3 of the 4 common opponents by bigger margins.
 
#96      
The conferences need to be smarter about their championship games. Miami should have played UVA because that would have made sure the ACC had a spot. Have to be able to flex to do the best for the conference finically rather than who is conference champs based on tie breakers. It is not like the schedules are balanced
 
#97      
But this is the bed ND makes with their schedule, right? If they want to be category-of-one special unicorns, they’d better beat the playoff-caliber teams, regardless of when they play them.
To some extent yes, but if you're going to allow an independent team to make the playoff you have to judge them on their resume. It is definitely flawed, but it's also better than Miami's.

More than anything I think their snub is a consequence of 1. The committee feeling they need a team from the ACC (while simultaneously not crediting ND's ACC-heavy schedule) and 2. The committee being unjustifiably enamored with the SEC.

Basically Ole Miss beat a bunch of ho-hum SEC teams and Oklahoma, but Oklahoma is a playoff team so that's good right? And Oklahoma beat a bunch of bad ho-hum teams and Alabama, and Alabama is a playoff team so that's good right? And Alabama beat Georgia (just ignore that they more recently got crushed by them and that they also lost to a terrible FSU team) so they're good right?

Yeah, if you decide these teams are good from the outset, and they beat up on each other, then you can say - "see, told you they were good." But, where's the evidence that your initial assessment was right?
 
#98      
More than anything I think their snub is a consequence of 1. The committee feeling they need a team from the ACC (while simultaneously not crediting ND's ACC-heavy schedule) and 2. The committee being unjustifiably enamored with the SEC
Agreement with all of this, which IMO is an argument for BYU being the team that should have been in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back