Lunardi is one of the lucky ones. A completely talentless individual who stumbled into something marketable.He thinks we lost-he has us in red lmao
Lunardi is one of the lucky ones. A completely talentless individual who stumbled into something marketable.He thinks we lost-he has us in red lmao
That's actually so embarrassing to release that and not have it updated after 30 minutes when it's your only jobLunardi is one of the lucky ones. A completely talentless individual who stumbled into something marketable.
Auburn ahead of Baylor on the S-curve, what in the world?
He apparently gave up on Illinois at halftime and forgot to update lmao.
Even had we lost, how does a semifinal quad one loss drop us FIVE spots???That's actually so embarrassing to release that and not have it updated after 30 minutes when it's your only job
That is a good point. Wild.Even had we lost, how does a semifinal quad one loss drop us FIVE spots???
Just beyond funny how embarrassing that is - guy literally has a job for like a 2-3 week sprint in March.He thinks we lost-he has us in red lmao
Lunardi is awful. He doesn’t watch the games clearly let alone actually getting seeding right. It’s widely known via Bracket Matrix he is very bad. Sometimes I wonder if he does this intentionally to generate espn engagement on social media.Just beyond funny how embarrassing that is - guy literally has a job for like a 2-3 week sprint in March.
Because the B1G is a FOX leagueEven had we lost, how does a semifinal quad one loss drop us FIVE spots???
Betting markets, while not perfect, have substantial predictive power, and are a reasonable way to identify when computer ranking algorithms might be missing key information. When they agree, there is a good reason to go with that consensus.Why would we even consider data used by gamblers? It’s called “gambling” for a reason.
Zero doubt, lockWe're getting Akron in the first round, aren't we?
Would expect that yeah. While the Groce narrative is there, they are way weaker than almost any other 13 or 14 team wiseWe're getting Akron in the first round, aren't we?
Incorrect. Dan banned him for saying stupid things.The best evidence yet that Lunardi is a Loyalty poster.
Yeah,,, KP 154 adjO, 99 adjD. Nebby is 35/29.Would expect that yeah. While the Groce narrative is there, they are way weaker than almost any other 13 or 14 team wise
And regarding the specific teams discussed in this thread, betting markets like Illinois and Auburn more than projected brackets, probably for the same reasons (overall good performance despite lack of premier wins)Betting markets...
I said when it was announced that I didn't like getting matched up with FAU in the preseason and people treated me like I was nuts. Yet we would be in solid 2 seed territory if we beat someone with a similar preseason ranking that plays in a major conference instead.The real question is FAU in. Only 2 Quad 1 wins. 1 Quad 3 and 2 Quad 4 losses. Only 9 Quad1/2 wins
His job is literally be wrong and then change his guess every week (and then every day) until the committee just does his job for him. Literally zero pressure to be right about anything.Lunardi is one of the lucky ones. A completely talentless individual who stumbled into something marketable.
His job is pretty similar to that of a TV meteorologist. He doesn't have to be right, just has to generate interest and discussion.His job is literally be wrong and then change his guess every week (and then every day) until the committee just does his job for him. Literally zero pressure to be right about anything.