Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#451      
The other thing with Pope is that sure, he won a title at Kentucky and was a good and well liked player. But it was for two years as a transfer back when that was rare, he's a Mormon from Washington, it's not a hand-in-glove cultural fit really.

It's not like when they almost hired John Pelphrey who wasn't much of a coach but who is a true blue legend of that state and program.
What does being a Mormon have to do with anything in this context? No Sunday games???
 
#452      

IlliniwekKDR

Colorado Springs, CO
I’ve been told tonight that he’s undecided on his future …

I’ve also been told one of our assistants has been requested for an associate HC interview … I will not disclose who or where …

But we could POTENTIALLY have an opening … Not a done deal … We’ll see if he takes the interview …

Mike Ehrmantraut Waiting GIF by Better Call Saul
 
#453      

lstewart53x3

Scottsdale, Arizona
You think Kentucky recruits itself because of Cal …

Assistants can only do so much … Pope is not getting those kind of kids Cal was … Boogie Fland playing for Mark Pope ??? Jayden Q playing for Pope ?? Don’t think so …

The elite 5 star level kids are not going to be lining up to play for Mark Pope … It’s just not gonna happen … Recruiting is going to have to change …

UK doesn’t want to be a development program but that’s what they just signed up for …

With Golden … Recruiting wouldn’t have slipped much at all …
To play devils advocate on Pope, I saw Robert make a couple good points in his slack:

While Kentucky had the better seed than BYU this year, Kentucky finished 23 in KenPom while BYU finished 18, even though Kentucky had the better talent.

BYU also had 3 starters who were transfers, so it looks like Pope understands the transfer game pretty well.

I don’t see him attracting the same type of talent as Cal, but maybe he doesn’t need to?

Robert also mentioned than Pope could be the guy that follows the guy that leads you to “the guy” next time around.

But - if this goes through, I def see UK falling down a notch in the college bball pecking order.
 
#454      

Zorak

Naperville
Hell, I'd rather have Eric Musselman or Andy Enfield than Mark Pope.
 
#456      
I’ve been told tonight that he’s undecided on his future …

I’ve also been told one of our assistants has been requested for an associate HC interview … I will not disclose who or where …

But we could POTENTIALLY have an opening … Not a done deal … We’ll see if he takes the interview …
I really hope this is Geoff, otherwise we would probably risk us losing any of our guys or potential guys.

If Geoff left would that jeopardize Jeremiah's commitment? Since Jeremiah seems to be the only guy on our roster, committed, or interested who Geoff was the lead guy for.
 
#458      
I really hope this is Geoff, otherwise we would probably risk us losing any of our guys or potential guys.

If Geoff left would that jeopardize Jeremiah's commitment? Since Jeremiah seems to be the only guy on our roster, committed, or interested who Geoff was the lead guy for.
Wasn't Geoff the lead for Boswell way back when? I doubt that really matters though
 
#459      
Is this Mark Pope stuff real? Seems like an absolutely baffling choice.

Don't know a ton about him other than his BYU team was incredibly soft but even with UK being UK I don't see top kids wanting to play for Pope.
If you think about it, Mark Pope is a safer hire than Jon Scheyer was. At least he has some big time coaching experience at a major program. Pope did okay for himself in his first year in the Big 12. He isn't the splash hire that Kentucky's fanbase hoped for but he is a young up and coming coach on the rise and is an alum. At least it's not Billy Gillespie

I'm pretty sure their AD preferred not to go the route of Bruce Pearl or Chris Beard or Sean Miller due to their past baggage. This is a safe route to go for them. They ran Cal out of town and this may or may not work out for them but at least there's a floor of getting to tournaments with Pope. Beyond that, Kentucky's fanbase better get their expectations tempered down a bit
 
Last edited:
#460      
Some of the names mentioned by Borzello as possible replacement for Pope at BYU:

-Mark Madsen, Cal head coach
-Barret Perry (UNLV assistant; Former Portland State head coach; native of the state of Utah who played in college in the state as well)
-Alex Jensen (Dallas Mavericks Assistan; Mr. Basketball in state of Utah in high school; played for Utah and was part of national runner-up team in 1998)
-Chris Burgess (University of Utah assistant; was previously BYU assistant from 2019-2022)
 
#461      
This has Matt Doherty vibes. Storied program hires an alum that did not have the resume for the job. Will Kentucky have as short a leash, and do they have a Roy Williams in their future.

I'd be pissed if I were a Kentucky fan. I'd be pissed as an Illinois fan if Kentucky got Underwood and we replaced him with Mark Pope.
Pope has more of a resume than Jon Scheyer did. Have you seen Pope's record since he got to BYU? This is not Matt Doherty
 
#462      
I would have just hired Pitino after Drew and Hurley turned it down. I think the fanbase would have at least been somewhat behind it.
Does it really make sense for Kentucky to hire a 70 yr old coach? I don't care if it is Rick Pitino. It is a short term band aid. They would have the same issue 5 yrs from now. Hire a younger coach who will potentially be there for the long haul if successful. St. John's made a move to get back into relevancy. Kentucky doesn't need to do that. They just need the right fit
 
#463      
Could be Kentucky's John Groce.
Mark Pope is a far superior coach to John Groce. This is simply the type of opinion from someone who has never seen a BYU game. Mark Pope didn't have a flash in the pan NCAA tournament success. He has proven he can build a program at a good basketball school. BYU is historically a good basketball school. I believe they were overrated throughout the season but they were still a fringe top 25 team IMO and they held their own in the Big 12. Groce could never hold his own in the Big 10 with his own players he recruited. The only success he had was the team he inherited from Weber
 
#464      
You think Kentucky recruits itself because of Cal …

Assistants can only do so much … Pope is not getting those kind of kids Cal was … Boogie Fland playing for Mark Pope ??? Jayden Q playing for Pope ?? Don’t think so …

The elite 5 star level kids are not going to be lining up to play for Mark Pope … It’s just not gonna happen … Recruiting is going to have to change …

UK doesn’t want to be a development program but that’s what they just signed up for …

With Golden … Recruiting wouldn’t have slipped much at all …
Two things:
Kentucky does recruit itself to a degree. Billy Gillespie got some big recruits in his failed gig before Cal.

This isn’t 2010 or even 2020 recruiting.
The transfer portal and Kentucky NIL $ is a top level recruiter in this new game. If Pope can coach, he can put together his kind of team that will win games because he will have talent just by being at Kentucky!
 
#465      

JFGsCoffeeMug

BU:1 Trash cans:0
Chicago
Mark Pope has never been involved with a big time program as a coach. He has spent 1 year as Director of Operations for Mark Fox at Georgia and 1 year as an Assistant Coach for Jeff Bzdelik at Wake Forest. Neither coach is a great coach and both seasons were bad seasons. Then he went off to Utah and has been there ever since. He has only been to the NCAA Tournament twice and never won a game. He hasn't recruited big time recruits.

There is absolutely nothing in this guys resume that says he's worthy of coaching at one of the top schools in the nation. Yes Kentucky will throw a wad of cash at kids, but so will Kansas, Duke, UNC, Illinois, Xavier, Arkansas, Missouri, Indiana, Arizona. It is not like Kentucky is the only school that has money. Maybe he's Mr. Charisma and can sell kids, but they're going to know the coaches at the other schools. Those coaches have years of experience talking to the top kids.

Another thing, he's been at BYU or Utah State for the last 13 years. He hasn't been at big programs. Who is he going to get for assistants? Is he going to be ok with guys he's unfamiliar with or is he going to want to bring his guys? It will likely be a mix, but that creates the risk of issues with your staff.

The problem is not that he's not a good coach. He certainly appears to be above average. The problem is that he doesn't appear to be a great coach, and he's going to a school where they expect greatness every year. After their last Elite 8, Calipari went 25-6, 9-16, 26-8, 22-12, 23-10 and they ran him out of town. They're not going to settle for 20 win seasons. And on top of it, the SEC is a stronger conference than it was 5-10 years ago. With Barnes at Tennessee, Oats at Alabama, Pearl at Auburn, Williams at Texas A&M, Paris at South Carolina, Beard at Ole Miss, Gates at Missouri, Calipari at Arkansas, and Golden at Florida you're going to need to be more than above average to bring Kentucky fans the amount of wins they expect.
Agreed. Pope is about to get eaten alive.

I think UK is hitting the coaching carousel again within 5 years.
 
#468      
If you think about it, Mark Pope is a safer hire than Jon Scheyer was. At least he has some big time coaching experience at a major program. Pope did okay for himself in his first year in the Big 12. He isn't the splash hire that Kentucky's fanbase hoped for but he is a young up and coming coach on the rise and is an alum. At least it's not Billy Gillespie

I'm pretty sure their AD preferred not to go the route of Bruce Pearl or Chris Beard or Sean Miller due to their past baggage. This is a safe route to go for them. They ran Cal out of town and this may or may not work out for them but at least there's a floor of getting to tournaments with Pope. Beyond that, Kentucky's fanbase better get their expectations tempered down a bit
Scheyer was hand picked and groomed by coach k. Even then I don't Scheyer is a great coach.

Pope will probably have some success just because of the amount of talent that ones will buy but I don't buy him dominating the SEC like that fanbase expects and I don't think he will recruit as Cal simply because Cal is a special recruiter.

You've got Oats at Alabama who is probably a top 2-3 coach in cbb, Barnes at Tenn, a very well funded Cal at Arkansas, Pearl at Auburn, and two rising head coaches in Golden and Parris that I like more than Pope. Then you still have Buzz Williams, Chris Beard, and Chris Jans in the conference.

Is that fanbase going to be happy finishing between 3rd and 7th every year? Because that is a lot of good coaches with good NIL that will put together good teams and I don't think any of them are getting out coached by Pope.
 
#470      
Mark Pope is a far superior coach to John Groce. This is simply the type of opinion from someone who has never seen a BYU game. Mark Pope didn't have a flash in the pan NCAA tournament success. He has proven he can build a program at a good basketball school. BYU is historically a good basketball school. I believe they were overrated throughout the season but they were still a fringe top 25 team IMO and they held their own in the Big 12. Groce could never hold his own in the Big 10 with his own players he recruited. The only success he had was the team he inherited from Weber
Cool.

He's never won an NCAA tournament game.
 
#473      
Scheyer was hand picked and groomed by coach k. Even then I don't Scheyer is a great coach.

Pope will probably have some success just because of the amount of talent that ones will buy but I don't buy him dominating the SEC like that fanbase expects and I don't think he will recruit as Cal simply because Cal is a special recruiter.

You've got Oats at Alabama who is probably a top 2-3 coach in cbb, Barnes at Tenn, a very well funded Cal at Arkansas, Pearl at Auburn, and two rising head coaches in Golden and Parris that I like more than Pope. Then you still have Buzz Williams, Chris Beard, and Chris Jans in the conference.

Is that fanbase going to be happy finishing between 3rd and 7th every year? Because that is a lot of good coaches with good NIL that will put together good teams and I don't think any of them are getting out coached by Pope.
I think Pope will have more success than Jans and Lamont Parris. Parris' system has a ceiling and I don't think he'll ever achieve extreme levels of success. The SEC will be a difficult conference to compete in but Pope will likely get better talent at Kentucky and his offensive scheme will be one that a lot of players will want to play in. Reed Shepard would probably thrive in his system if he stays for another year.

I agree that he likely won't be dominating the SEC but that is because of all the good coaches that are in that conference. Kentucky's fanbase will need to temper their expectations similarly to what has happened at Indiana
 
#474      
Cool.

He's never won an NCAA tournament game.
2019–20BYU24–813–32ndPostseason not held
2020–21BYU20–710–32ndNCAA Division I Round of 64
2021–22BYU24–119–65thNIT Quarterfinals
2022–23BYU19–157–9T–5th
BYU Cougars (Big 12 Conference) (2023–present)​
2023–24BYU23–1110–8T–5thNCAA Division I Round of 64
BYU:110–52 (.679)49–29 (.628)

Enough said....The fact that you compared Pope to John Groce is sheer craziness. Winning a couple games in the NCAA tournament does not make you more qualified to coach at a high level. The tournament can be kind of fluky. He's only had 2 cracks at the tournament so far so this is a very small sample size to judge him on. He never got to an NCAA tournament at Utah Valley but proved he could make the transition from a smaller school to a bigger school fairly easily. His track record appears to be someone on an upward trajectory.

Jon Scheyer also never won a tournament game before he got handed over the Duke job. That decision isn't looking so bad either. Maybe you need to focus more on the long term than looking at what he's done so far in a small sample size.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.