This happens to leaders across the spectrum of excellence. If he can be re-claimed, Illini Nation will be blessed.I agree with BU needing to re-find himself. Somewhere he has lost the passion and emotion.
This happens to leaders across the spectrum of excellence. If he can be re-claimed, Illini Nation will be blessed.I agree with BU needing to re-find himself. Somewhere he has lost the passion and emotion.
I agree with BU needing to re-find himself. Somewhere he has lost the passion and emotion. Don't know if Josh told him to cool it or his boy told him but you can tell it is not him and he is fighting himself. I think he may possibly be a better coach with less talent.
@Indy Illini Fan do you think SC would make a move on Lamont? I have been so shocked with how poorly he has performed this year after last year. Especially after the scare he gave us a few years ago. Really thought he was gonna get it rolling. New AD will want to bring his guy in , but thought he would get another year.Miami … FSU … LSU … ASU … Cincy … TCU … South Carolina … Oklahoma … Texas …
Assuming there’s transition at those schools …
UNC wouldn’t be happy but he’d win …
I ain’t saying get rid of Brad either … I like Brad but sticking with Tyler and Hamer can’t continue after this season … And if he refuses to make that change … It’s going to be tough …
What’s overlooked is the youth of this team, star or otherwise, all navigating a B1G season for the first time and dealing with injury and reffing discontinuities to the lineup.
At the beginning of the year, many of us felt year 2 would be it.
I would say that most, including Brad, do better with older teams.
History shows this so we aren’t unique in our struggles.
I can spell out Tyler’s success last year in three letters.
TSJ.
Ive never coached a single game of organized basketball, I could have coached our offense last year.
This year? We needed a true basketball mind to meld a young Euro phenom G with a C and other pieces that offer multiple options requiring adjustments and navigating communication barriers.
I think Tyler is way over his head with this years assignment.
Last year was kids play with TSJ.
Did he have Gentry there?Brad lost 1 whole conference game at SFA lol
and many of us felt that that the year two of some people's dreams would never happen. I guess we'll see.What’s overlooked is the youth of this team, star or otherwise, all navigating a B1G season for the first time and dealing with injury and reffing discontinuities to the lineup.
At the beginning of the year, many of us felt year 2 would be it.
I would say that most, including Brad, do better with older teams.
History shows this so we aren’t unique in our struggles.
His so called high ceiling guys all were busts. Hum, Booth, White, Boswell. I just don't buy that these guys were really high ceiling. One of the mysteries for me is how so many people bought this notion.This is the fun question. A few thoughts:
(b) I understand the second-guessing about the choice, and I'm still said about Rodgers being benched/redshirted, but I commend Underwood for taking the risk represented in this season's roster choices. He doesn't just want to make the tournament. He wants to win a national title. He realized that he needed to change strategy to acquire more high-ceiling talent. He took a big swing this year when he had immense job security - he could have brought back Harris, Goode, Moretti, Hansberry, Dainja, DGL, waited out Hawkins, and then hunted out a couple fringe starting wings to mix with Morez, and hoped for a couple underclassmen (Hansberry, DGL) to make a big leap to make them conference contenders. Underwood probably viewed that roster as interesting but (correctly) as a team that could not win a national title (or B1G title). The problem is making this choice meant completely nuke-ing the roster and....
We didn’t run any offense for TJ.I can spell out Tyler’s success last year in three letters.
TSJ.
Ive never coached a single game of organized basketball, I could have coached our offense last year.
This year? We needed a true basketball mind to meld a young Euro phenom G with a C and other pieces that offer multiple options requiring adjustments and navigating communication barriers.
I think Tyler is way over his head with this years assignment.
Last year was kids play with TSJ.
ExactlyWe didn’t run any offense for TJ.
A) Still don’t understand how we are paying a guy a half a million to not coach. I’m sure he has a contract, but if he is unwilling to honor the terms, there has to be an out there. There has to be more to this story. Seems like Tim and Chester were forcing a mutiny and both got pushed out?This is the fun question. A few thoughts:
(a) Bungling the Tim Anderson employment was bad and looking worse as we tread through the season. Seen lots of discussion on here about it and the reasoning but either things don't add up or it's looking like multiple parties badly played their hand. Folks leaked that it was going to be tough to juggle two high-paying assistants going forward but the current assistant staff is so underwhelming that the 2024 avoidance is a 2025 necessity.
(b) I understand the second-guessing about the choice, and I'm still said about Rodgers being benched/redshirted, but I commend Underwood for taking the risk represented in this season's roster choices. He doesn't just want to make the tournament. He wants to win a national title. He realized that he needed to change strategy to acquire more high-ceiling talent. He took a big swing this year when he had immense job security - he could have brought back Harris, Goode, Moretti, Hansberry, Dainja, DGL, waited out Hawkins, and then hunted out a couple fringe starting wings to mix with Morez, and hoped for a couple underclassmen (Hansberry, DGL) to make a big leap to make them conference contenders. Underwood probably viewed that roster as interesting but (correctly) as a team that could not win a national title (or B1G title). The problem is making this choice meant completely nuke-ing the roster and....
(c) ...the emerging golden rule for team success is roster retention. The 2024-25 over-performing teams are the ones that brought back to most players from the previous roster. Churning over such large portions of your roster creates a much, much higher risk (hellooooo Indiana, Miami, North Carolina) and it takes some fortuitous breaks that everything can mix together perfectly. It's interesting that Bielema and Underwood have both had incredible success at Illinois but they've diverged from each other this year on approaching the transfer portal. Underwood could say he looked at the pending 2024-25 roster and simply believed he had a better chance of success with a total overhaul with more talent but crushing the culture and that would have been fair, the question now is whether he continues taking these swings or tries going back to the '22-24 approach.
23 pts per game with zero game planning. TSJ was to last years offense as MJ was to the Triangle offense.Exactly
Well, ironically, with this year’s performance we have a better chance of getting some players back that definitely wouldn’t have been back with more success.and many of us felt that that the year two of some people's dreams would never happen. I guess we'll see.
Didn’t our offense go up in KenPom during TJ’s absence?Exactly
I’ll tell ya one thing. You can can’t say Brad hasn’t evolved. We know Brad generally prefers about a 7-8 man rotation; (like a lot of coaches do) Here he is at about the 7:40-7:45ish range extolling the virtues of a 9-10 man rotation…saying that’s what he has always done up to that point…
In another dustbin postgame video also from 2018…I believe…He’s getting peppered pretty good by the media about his decision to begin the game with……..a…………….wait for it…..,….wait for it……………..z…..o….n…e…D!
I must find it…I think it was actually against Penn State…but I could be wrong…
If someone finds it first… let me know….![]()
![]()
Why are you worried about Indiana's money situationDoes IU have money for Boynton AND Yaklich?