Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#526      
A theory I've been workshopping that got a big shot in the arm last night: Ivisic is our most important player*, by a lot.

If you're a buyer on that, the narrative of this season takes a different shape.

*not most talented, not most EDG, but literally the most important in that if he is healthy/playing well, we can do lots of advantageous things on both ends of the floor that virtually disappear when he is not
Amen brother - he's what our whole offense work,

1740586445548.png
 
#528      
I'm willing to give Brad a pass on this one.

Going down a level was a very smart move by Podz. Playing in the WCC enabled Podz to shine on offense while masking his defensive weakness -- there was only 1 (2?) PGs in the conference good enough to expose him. ... I'm not sure he would survive anywhere in the NBA outside of the warriors offense that so strongly emphasizes 3pt shooting and cuts vs. initiating offense via a dribble drive. He falls in/out of the warrior rotation as they experiment with other backup PGs.
(1) I wonder how things would have gone for the 2022-23 team if Podz had been on the roster, instead of either Skyy Clark or Brandon Epps. I have no opinion about it, I just wonder if he could in fact have been featured using the minutes given to Clark in particular.

(2) Interesting that the Illini offense this year -- emphasizing 3 point shooting over dribble drive -- seems to closely resemble the GS Warriors' offense.
 
#529      
I don't understand the money comparisons. Does it really matter if Underwood is making $7 million and another coach is making $5 million that's more successful? It makes sense if Illinois is going to be searching for a coach and it's someone that's going to be targeted, but Painter isn't coming here (and likely isn't on Whitman's list). ...
I share your sentiment, but with a caveat:

Would $2 million/year ($7 million - 5 million salary difference) be divertable to player salary? Coincidentally, that amount might (or not) have brought Coleman back this year.
 
#530      
Lol.......apparently Kylan and the players had to go to the coaching staff to tell them what defensive adjustments needed to be made? Isn't that what we're paying Hamer 200k for?
Honestly, this happens with a good program and a system that puts weight on what the players think. They come to the coach with what they are comfortable doing. Players should have some say in what is being run.

Now, this might have been a situation that the players literally knew better than our DC but I have a hard time believing that Underwood didn't have a hand in this defensive change.
 
#531      
So WHAT are we supposed to do give Underwood 10 ,13 , 18 or 19 Years and hope he wins a National Championship or makes a final 4 at Illinois. THIS IS THE NIL ERA Some of the Brad Underwood cult members are Brad Underwood fans and Not THE University of Illinois fans. My goodness. All those coaches Jay Wright, Tony Bennett, Scott Drew were before NIL and none of Them made the money Underwood is making now . Matt Painter had 5 Sweet Sixteens and 1 Elite 8 before his final 4 run last season. Painter is also a Purdue alum and former Purdue Basketball player.
Man, I just don't think that it being the NIL era means that any coach should be fired if they have a down year since apparently it should be so easy to restock with talent and have them gel. Lots of really great coaches who have had seasons falling on their faces, even with NIL.

Do you think Kansas should fire Bill Self because they're having a relatively down season even with (maybe even due to) NIL?
 
#535      
If you are earnestly asking this question than you either only started watching Illinois in 2021 or you really have negative basketball knowledge.

C'mon dude.
But is it that much different that Weber taking Self recruits to the championship game? and then 7 more years of declining basketball because of recruiting.

I believe the question/statement is that Groce with someone else's recruits (Underwood's) might be able to get more out of this team. Not that Groce can build/recruit a better team, Illinois tried that with no success.
 
#536      
But is it that much different that Weber taking Self recruits to the championship game? and then 7 more years of declining basketball because of recruiting.

I believe the question/statement is that Groce with someone else's recruits (Underwood's) might be able to get more out of this team. Not that Groce can build/recruit a better team, Illinois tried that with no success.
Groce had a lot of big misses in the recruiting arena that hurt him and most critically wasted a ton of his and his staff's time and effort, but he did bring some pretty strong players through, recruiting is not his weakness by any means.

Just on a basic tactical, schematic level he gotten beaten like a drum by the Beilein's and Painter's and Izzo's of the world over and over and over again. It couldn't have been any clearer that he wasn't in their league with the dry-erase board in his hand, and with BU it's the opposite as much as some failures lead people to want to believe otherwise.
 
#537      
I do think Weber just kind of comes across as a dork and has a weird voice which probably doesn't help recruiting.

Dude could coach and I think there's a legitimate argument that Weber got more out of that 04-05 team than Self would have(though Self would have also had Charlie Villenueva so I think he wins the title).

Weber turned SIU around fairly quickly and they had some very good teams while he also developed Painter as a coach. Weber only won under 20 games twice at Illinois and one of those years he nearly pulled off a miraculous big 10 tourney run. Then he had a pretty good run at K-State.

I wonder if Weber would be remembered a bit differently if they didn't run into Brandon Roy the year after and they had another tourney run.
Nick Smith one time said that Bill Self was like your older brother and Bruce Weber was like your high school math teacher.
 
#539      
Honestly, this happens with a good program and a system that puts weight on what the players think. They come to the coach with what they are comfortable doing. Players should have some say in what is being run.

Now, this might have been a situation that the players literally knew better than our DC but I have a hard time believing that Underwood didn't have a hand in this defensive change.
Underwood made it clear in his interview that they'd wanted to make defensive changes for some time but needed enough collective health to practice them so they were waiting until potentially after this game and Kylan said they're ready and led the way.

Keep in mind Kylan was clearly recruited to serve as a floor general. The whole point of him as a player is to generate and implement schemes, so it shouldn't be a diss on Underwood that he's doing what he was recruited for.
 
#542      
Honestly, this happens with a good program and a system that puts weight on what the players think. They come to the coach with what they are comfortable doing. Players should have some say in what is being run.

Now, this might have been a situation that the players literally knew better than our DC but I have a hard time believing that Underwood didn't have a hand in this defensive change.
This to me is another situation where both things can be true.

There is nothing wrong with open communication and feedback between players and staff. Quite the opposite, it is very healthy and I would argue crucial to a successful season.

However, I do not believe that this is the first time player feedback was given, and nor do I believe the staff was open to acting on it, until very recently. So credit Brad & Co for adjusting now but previous criticism still stands. Waited far too long.
 
#544      
A theory I've been workshopping that got a big shot in the arm last night: Ivisic is our most important player*, by a lot.

If you're a buyer on that, the narrative of this season takes a different shape.

*not most talented, not most EDG, but literally the most important in that if he is healthy/playing well, we can do lots of advantageous things on both ends of the floor that virtually disappear when he is not
This is where I’ve been for awhile. I thought people weren’t putting enough importance on what him being hurt/sick had on this team. He is a huge part of what we’re trying to do —especially on offense — and his absence negatively impacts other players’ performances. Now with Morez out, he is even more important. Though Tomi is fairly young, I also think he has a calming influence. Much like a big security blanket.
 
#547      
John Groce was bad. Fear of a John Groce repeat isn't a good enough reason to keep a coach.
Bill Self is a superstar. Until Illinois gets a coach of his caliber in here fans will be calling for an upgrade.

In no way is Brad Underwood in the superstar coach tier where people like Coach K, Dean Smith, Roy Williams, Tom Izzo, Bob Knight, Lute Olson, Rick Pitino, John Calipari, Bill Self, Jay Wright sit. All of those I listed have a natty (7 have 2 or more), 4 or more final fours, 10 or more P6 conf. championships, win % > 70% at P6 school, conf win % > 70% at P6 school (except izzo and wright), and 8 or less years at a P6 school to reach first final four.

Is Brad at the next tier down, the Thad Matta, Bo Ryan, Matt Painter tier? Maybe, though his career achievements aren't as good as those three and he's older than Painter and Matta. But until you've found a superstar coach you don't stop looking. And if you want to fire Brad, show me some freakin' names, and put their last 6 years of accomplishments against his side by side.
 
#549      
I understand the desire to memory-hole the particulars of the Groce Era, but dear god people, you need to remember this.
And we are still waiting for the pg that would save those teams. Maybe winning a couple of recruiting battles could have helped a bit, but the Groce era was nothing short of a failure from high-level recruiting to being consistently outcoached. We sure did finish second in a lot of those big name recruiting battles though.
 
Last edited:
#550      
A theory I've been workshopping that got a big shot in the arm last night: Ivisic is our most important player*, by a lot.

If you're a buyer on that, the narrative of this season takes a different shape.

*not most talented, not most EDG, but literally the most important in that if he is healthy/playing well, we can do lots of advantageous things on both ends of the floor that virtually disappear when he is not
There You Go Yes GIF by CBS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back