My brain just melted watching that spotter. What an absolute a$$hole.
I remember @GrayGhost77 not even needing a spotter for 3 plates. I was just there for moral support.
Lol wish I could still hit that. Old joints say "no mas!".I remember @GrayGhost77 not even needing a spotter for 3 plates. I was just there for moral support.
Haha. Even my young joints said "no gracias"Lol wish I could still hit that. Old joints say "no mas!".
Username + video = raises questions, haha!
Im surprised they are all that interested in Colorado St. I figure they must have info that U of Colorado is quietly flirting with the B12.Some dispatches from the PAC-12. Lots of positive talk from PAC-12 officials.
![]()
Canzano: Pac-12 officially exploring four expansion schools
Oregon remains "way on board" with Pac-12, per source.www.johncanzano.com
Not true. Living in the Denver metro there's almost as many CSU grads in the Front Range as CU grads. There's 5 million people from Colo Springs to Ft Collins. Not insignificant. Half the people I work with are CSU grads and die hard Rams fans.Don't get the P12 interest in either CSU or SMU. Nobody outside of Ft Collins is interested in CSU and nobody outside of Dallas has any interest in SMU.
I get SDSU, but they need to find another candidate.
Some dispatches from the PAC-12. Lots of positive talk from PAC-12 officials.
![]()
Canzano: Pac-12 officially exploring four expansion schools
Oregon remains "way on board" with Pac-12, per source.www.johncanzano.com
The Big Ten will never go for half shares. It sets a precedent of placing certain teams over others, which is what ruins the dynamics wherever Texas goes.If this really goes down, its not far fetched to think Oregon and Washington and maybe Cal and Stanford go to the Big Ten asking for even half shares of the media deal or even less to join.
You do realize Nebraska, Rutgers and Maryland all never got full shares when they first joined the conference, right? I believe it took until the next media rights deal after joining to get full shares. I am not even sure if Maryland is going to be getting full share yet at the start of this new deal since they actually borrowed money from the B1G to get out of their ACC deal.The Big Ten will never go for half shares. It sets a precedent of placing certain teams over others, which is what ruins the dynamics wherever Texas goes.
The equity angle is too important for the Big Ten to give up, even if the new schools are asking for that.
I get that and I would be terrified of a precedent that puts us at risk for receiving less than a full share in the future.The Big Ten will never go for half shares. It sets a precedent of placing certain teams over others, which is what ruins the dynamics wherever Texas goes.
The equity angle is too important for the Big Ten to give up, even if the new schools are asking for that.
I get that and I would be terrified of a precedent that puts us at risk for receiving less than a full share in the future.
However, Nebraska, Maryland, and Rutgers did not receive full shares initially when they joined. They each had to wait 6 years to get the full share, and then it seems that Rutgers and Maryland took out loans against future payments when they joined.
![]()
USC, UCLA will receive full Big Ten revenue share before Rutgers: Here’s why
Big Ten Commissioner Kevin Warren discussed why USC, UCLA got different treatment than previous expansion teams entering the league.www.nj.com
So what I'm saying is that Oregon and Washington would be begging for such a set up, even if it is just half or less, for perhaps the length of this media rights deal, with the idea that at the next deal everyone should be getting full shares.
I'm with you now. I thought it was that they were "borrowing" against their share when they came in.I get that and I would be terrified of a precedent that puts us at risk for receiving less than a full share in the future.
However, Nebraska, Maryland, and Rutgers did not receive full shares initially when they joined. They each had to wait 6 years to get the full share, and then it seems that Rutgers and Maryland took out loans against future payments when they joined.
![]()
USC, UCLA will receive full Big Ten revenue share before Rutgers: Here’s why
Big Ten Commissioner Kevin Warren discussed why USC, UCLA got different treatment than previous expansion teams entering the league.www.nj.com
So what I'm saying is that Oregon and Washington would be begging for such a set up, even if it is just half or less, for perhaps the length of this media rights deal, with the idea that at the next deal everyone should be getting full shares.