That elitist, blonde, jock a-hole character that is the antagonist in many movies set on college campuses? I always thought that was an exaggerated stereotype. Then I moved to LA and discovered that it’s real life USC Fan.
Is there a point where travel from the “strong west coast brands” that we brought in becomes so undesirable, that top recruits don’t go there, so they begin to be not as good, and then lose the brand strength we brought them for?How far Oregon has to travel to play every team in the Big Ten Conference
Gas up the jets, the Oregon Ducks are going to be hitting the road next year.www.yahoo.com
Interesting take from an Oregon fan on travel.
BFC?Go really modern, like baby names:
B'G
@Indy Illini Fan we fight?!This is like when @Indy Illini Fan and @illini0440 are fighting.
TimelessBFC?
I'd like to take this moment to remind everyone that 40 years ago we went 9-0 and defeated EVERY Big 10 team. The only team to ever accomplish that feat and obviously one that won't ever be done again.
MFB1GBFC?
I also find it interesting that our egghead academic leaders and their like who constantly pound the sacred drum of environmental stewardship supports increasing the number of long distance flights by their sports teams for athletic prestige and the almighty dollar.The B1G strategy really doesn’t make a lot of sense at times and the conference seems more reactive in the moment than strategic. Maryland and Rutgers get added because carriage fees and in-marker rates are a big deal (and now they aren’t as important). Nebraska gets added because football is important, but market size isn’t, and they fit the AAU model. But now their football sucks and they are no longer AAU. Then UCLA and USC are added because markets matter again (but these are two schools that lack the passionate local intensity of many of our college towns for sports), but the conference only wants two west coast schools. We don’t add PNW at this time because they don’t add value, the LA schools don’t want them to come, and we don’t want to be perceived as killing the PAC conference. Then we decide to add these schools even though one has really poor academics and doesn’t fit the profile of a B1G school (Oregon), but they’ve been good at football for 15 years.
The conference just seems to constantly change and react rather than having a plan for what kind of conference we want to be.
Oregon reminds me of "Housewives of ..." It's all about the bling.USC is pretty much the Michigan of the Pac10. Huge superiority complex, an elitist obnoxious whiny attitude, and fans who play the part. I'd be surprised if pretty much every B10 fanbase doesn't hate them within their first year of joining. Oregon will probably be a weird one as they'll likely upset the current B10 powerhouses and the traditional institutes the most, but for us, they may be a meh. UCLA and Washington will likely fit in fine and mix it up. I could see the potential for a rivalry there.
It was pac 8. They got mocked just a bit for adding the arizona schools that didn't touch the pacific ocean.It's bad MOJO to change the conference name, look at the Pac-10, then 12, now gone.
SEC and B1G are the two strongest conferences by a lot, and neither 10 nor southeast fully applies anymore.
Better hope not. Or Illinois might well be next.IF the B1G really wanted a sizeable group, lets say CLEM, FSU, UNC, WA, OR, is there any chance of changes to existing membership? TV markets aside, is there any chance of a Rutgers being kindly shown the door to make room for a brand that is 10x theirs?
For, um, ducks.Grim??? It’s paradise!
Robert has a very insightful blog article discussing this and the likely future of big time college footballOne perk of having 4 teams on the West Coast now...
#BigTenAfterDark
I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.I have gotten use to Nebraska in the BIg Ten because they fit the Big Ten mold
Maryland and Rutgers I still haven't gotten use to and still dislike it
These Pac Ten teams coming in? Not a chance
The idea of seeing Oregon vs Rutgers play instead of Oregon vs Arizona does not mean anything to me
It's going to be a sad day when we lose out on our rivals due to having to play these west coast teams
I’m a fan of rotating who you play so that you don’t have 3 year or even 2 year gaps when you don’t play. With a big gap are you really in the same conference? On the other hand, if you rotate frequently and say play ~9 one year and ~9 the next you have such unbalanced schedules that the best record might not be the best team but a product of favorable scheduling. Like the basketball schedule on steroids.I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.
If you look at the Big Ten, there are currently 18 schools. As that number increases do they ever say this whole Big TEN thing is getting more and more stupid and change the name? If that occurs, that would surely tick off a lot of people.
But with 18 teams, we've got to have presumably 2 divisions of 9. If you go with a simple geographical East vs West, then the West Division would be Oregon, Washington, UCLA, USC, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois? Illinois, Wisconsin, and Northwestern would be on the borders. So would they split up Wisconsin and Minnesota or Illinois and Northwestern? I think the Illinois and Northwestern fans would care less than the Badgers and Gophers, but it would seem dumb to split teams from the same state. So let's just assume the 9 I listed are in the West and everyone else is in the East.
So if you look at a football schedule, surely you would play the other 8 teams in your division, meaning you get to play 1 or 2 games against the other division. Since we'd be in with 5 of the newest Big Ten teams it will be completely different for us. Just wait for the complaints when USC has to play Michigan from the other division and UCLA plays Northwestern. Or Michigan gets Oregon and Ohio State gets Nebraska. There will be teams in your conference you only play once every 3 or 4 years.
Then if you look at basketball, we play 20 games. Either you don't play anyone twice or there are teams you won't play at all. What is the point of being a conference if you don't even play each other. And none of this brings into account the travel. Having teams in 4 different time zones can create some major problems. If this is really all about tv money, sorry folks you're not going to get a lot of people sitting around at midnight watching their team play on the west coast.
Someone mentioned, the SEC is remaining a southern conference. To me that means they're doing it right. If I'm the SEC I'm going after Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson, Louisville. That allows me to get quality teams, keep rivalries, and keep a geographically contiguous and concentrated set of teams in 2 time zones which greatly eases scheduling.
I think ultimately, the more teams group into a small number of conferences, the more meaningless a conference is.
I think you right in with this, but the problem is the SEC is/was such a better football conference than the BIG. Since the BIG could never get ND to join they had to go outside traditional geographic boundary’s to get more “power” in football. PSU and Nebraska (at least in theory for Nebraska) did this. So the big had:I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.
If you look at the Big Ten, there are currently 18 schools. As that number increases do they ever say this whole Big TEN thing is getting more and more stupid and change the name? If that occurs, that would surely tick off a lot of people.
But with 18 teams, we've got to have presumably 2 divisions of 9. If you go with a simple geographical East vs West, then the West Division would be Oregon, Washington, UCLA, USC, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois? Illinois, Wisconsin, and Northwestern would be on the borders. So would they split up Wisconsin and Minnesota or Illinois and Northwestern? I think the Illinois and Northwestern fans would care less than the Badgers and Gophers, but it would seem dumb to split teams from the same state. So let's just assume the 9 I listed are in the West and everyone else is in the East.
So if you look at a football schedule, surely you would play the other 8 teams in your division, meaning you get to play 1 or 2 games against the other division. Since we'd be in with 5 of the newest Big Ten teams it will be completely different for us. Just wait for the complaints when USC has to play Michigan from the other division and UCLA plays Northwestern. Or Michigan gets Oregon and Ohio State gets Nebraska. There will be teams in your conference you only play once every 3 or 4 years.
Then if you look at basketball, we play 20 games. Either you don't play anyone twice or there are teams you won't play at all. What is the point of being a conference if you don't even play each other. And none of this brings into account the travel. Having teams in 4 different time zones can create some major problems. If this is really all about tv money, sorry folks you're not going to get a lot of people sitting around at midnight watching their team play on the west coast.
Someone mentioned, the SEC is remaining a southern conference. To me that means they're doing it right. If I'm the SEC I'm going after Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson, Louisville. That allows me to get quality teams, keep rivalries, and keep a geographically contiguous and concentrated set of teams in 2 time zones which greatly eases scheduling.
I think ultimately, the more teams group into a small number of conferences, the more meaningless a conference is.
It's an unrivalled geographical setting, for sure. My bro lived there for several years. Winters were... challenging. I visited a good friend there in July '96 and then spent the following week in Vancouver and out on the Island with my girlfriend. It was cloudless and 75-80 the entire time. Massive high pressure system just parked over the Pac NW. 25 years later my friend in Seattle told me that her friends and neighbors still talked about those two weeks in July '96!Grim??? It’s paradise!
Never mind wishing to kick their feathery behinds (and pride goeth before the fall and so on), this guy doesn't seem to have done much traveling.Is there a point where travel from the “strong west coast brands” that we brought in becomes so undesirable, that top recruits don’t go there, so they begin to be not as good, and then lose the brand strength we brought them for?
Analysis: I can promise you I will never make the drive to Illinois, and even a flight to watch the Fighting Illini may not be too appealing.the guys team has been in the B1G less than an hour and he’s already disrespecting us . ugh