Conference Realignment

Status
Not open for further replies.
#527      
#531      
I'd like to take this moment to remind everyone that 40 years ago we went 9-0 and defeated EVERY Big 10 team. The only team to ever accomplish that feat and obviously one that won't ever be done again.
giphy.gif

giphy.gif

giphy-downsized-large.gif

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
#535      
It's bad MOJO to change the conference name, look at the Pac-10, then 12, now gone.

SEC and B1G are the two strongest conferences by a lot, and neither 10 nor southeast fully applies anymore.
 
#537      
The B1G strategy really doesn’t make a lot of sense at times and the conference seems more reactive in the moment than strategic. Maryland and Rutgers get added because carriage fees and in-marker rates are a big deal (and now they aren’t as important). Nebraska gets added because football is important, but market size isn’t, and they fit the AAU model. But now their football sucks and they are no longer AAU. Then UCLA and USC are added because markets matter again (but these are two schools that lack the passionate local intensity of many of our college towns for sports), but the conference only wants two west coast schools. We don’t add PNW at this time because they don’t add value, the LA schools don’t want them to come, and we don’t want to be perceived as killing the PAC conference. Then we decide to add these schools even though one has really poor academics and doesn’t fit the profile of a B1G school (Oregon), but they’ve been good at football for 15 years.

The conference just seems to constantly change and react rather than having a plan for what kind of conference we want to be.
I also find it interesting that our egghead academic leaders and their like who constantly pound the sacred drum of environmental stewardship supports increasing the number of long distance flights by their sports teams for athletic prestige and the almighty dollar.
 
#538      
USC is pretty much the Michigan of the Pac10. Huge superiority complex, an elitist obnoxious whiny attitude, and fans who play the part. I'd be surprised if pretty much every B10 fanbase doesn't hate them within their first year of joining. Oregon will probably be a weird one as they'll likely upset the current B10 powerhouses and the traditional institutes the most, but for us, they may be a meh. UCLA and Washington will likely fit in fine and mix it up. I could see the potential for a rivalry there.
Oregon reminds me of "Housewives of ..." It's all about the bling.
 
#540      
I have gotten use to Nebraska in the BIg Ten because they fit the Big Ten mold

Maryland and Rutgers I still haven't gotten use to and still dislike it

These Pac Ten teams coming in? Not a chance

The idea of seeing Oregon vs Rutgers play instead of Oregon vs Arizona does not mean anything to me

It's going to be a sad day when we lose out on our rivals due to having to play these west coast teams
 
#544      
I have gotten use to Nebraska in the BIg Ten because they fit the Big Ten mold

Maryland and Rutgers I still haven't gotten use to and still dislike it

These Pac Ten teams coming in? Not a chance

The idea of seeing Oregon vs Rutgers play instead of Oregon vs Arizona does not mean anything to me

It's going to be a sad day when we lose out on our rivals due to having to play these west coast teams
I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.

If you look at the Big Ten, there are currently 18 schools. As that number increases do they ever say this whole Big TEN thing is getting more and more stupid and change the name? If that occurs, that would surely tick off a lot of people.

But with 18 teams, we've got to have presumably 2 divisions of 9. If you go with a simple geographical East vs West, then the West Division would be Oregon, Washington, UCLA, USC, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois? Illinois, Wisconsin, and Northwestern would be on the borders. So would they split up Wisconsin and Minnesota or Illinois and Northwestern? I think the Illinois and Northwestern fans would care less than the Badgers and Gophers, but it would seem dumb to split teams from the same state. So let's just assume the 9 I listed are in the West and everyone else is in the East.

So if you look at a football schedule, surely you would play the other 8 teams in your division, meaning you get to play 1 or 2 games against the other division. Since we'd be in with 5 of the newest Big Ten teams it will be completely different for us. Just wait for the complaints when USC has to play Michigan from the other division and UCLA plays Northwestern. Or Michigan gets Oregon and Ohio State gets Nebraska. There will be teams in your conference you only play once every 3 or 4 years.

Then if you look at basketball, we play 20 games. Either you don't play anyone twice or there are teams you won't play at all. What is the point of being a conference if you don't even play each other. And none of this brings into account the travel. Having teams in 4 different time zones can create some major problems. If this is really all about tv money, sorry folks you're not going to get a lot of people sitting around at midnight watching their team play on the west coast.

Someone mentioned, the SEC is remaining a southern conference. To me that means they're doing it right. If I'm the SEC I'm going after Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson, Louisville. That allows me to get quality teams, keep rivalries, and keep a geographically contiguous and concentrated set of teams in 2 time zones which greatly eases scheduling.

I think ultimately, the more teams group into a small number of conferences, the more meaningless a conference is.
 
#545      

Illini92and96

Austin, TX
I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.

If you look at the Big Ten, there are currently 18 schools. As that number increases do they ever say this whole Big TEN thing is getting more and more stupid and change the name? If that occurs, that would surely tick off a lot of people.

But with 18 teams, we've got to have presumably 2 divisions of 9. If you go with a simple geographical East vs West, then the West Division would be Oregon, Washington, UCLA, USC, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois? Illinois, Wisconsin, and Northwestern would be on the borders. So would they split up Wisconsin and Minnesota or Illinois and Northwestern? I think the Illinois and Northwestern fans would care less than the Badgers and Gophers, but it would seem dumb to split teams from the same state. So let's just assume the 9 I listed are in the West and everyone else is in the East.

So if you look at a football schedule, surely you would play the other 8 teams in your division, meaning you get to play 1 or 2 games against the other division. Since we'd be in with 5 of the newest Big Ten teams it will be completely different for us. Just wait for the complaints when USC has to play Michigan from the other division and UCLA plays Northwestern. Or Michigan gets Oregon and Ohio State gets Nebraska. There will be teams in your conference you only play once every 3 or 4 years.

Then if you look at basketball, we play 20 games. Either you don't play anyone twice or there are teams you won't play at all. What is the point of being a conference if you don't even play each other. And none of this brings into account the travel. Having teams in 4 different time zones can create some major problems. If this is really all about tv money, sorry folks you're not going to get a lot of people sitting around at midnight watching their team play on the west coast.

Someone mentioned, the SEC is remaining a southern conference. To me that means they're doing it right. If I'm the SEC I'm going after Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson, Louisville. That allows me to get quality teams, keep rivalries, and keep a geographically contiguous and concentrated set of teams in 2 time zones which greatly eases scheduling.

I think ultimately, the more teams group into a small number of conferences, the more meaningless a conference is.
I’m a fan of rotating who you play so that you don’t have 3 year or even 2 year gaps when you don’t play. With a big gap are you really in the same conference? On the other hand, if you rotate frequently and say play ~9 one year and ~9 the next you have such unbalanced schedules that the best record might not be the best team but a product of favorable scheduling. Like the basketball schedule on steroids.
 
#546      
Wonder if mountain west can just rebrand as pac12? I’m sure remaining pac teams will still be able to bring teams in, pac more desired name than other conferences. Guessing they still have rights to the name? But idk. Mountain west will probably be dissolved. Grab some from wac/ west coast/ sky. Just rotating chairs.
 
#547      
I'm also in the camp of they're ruining college athletics. Granted, in 20 years no one may care, but during this transition it's a huge change no fan asked for.

If you look at the Big Ten, there are currently 18 schools. As that number increases do they ever say this whole Big TEN thing is getting more and more stupid and change the name? If that occurs, that would surely tick off a lot of people.

But with 18 teams, we've got to have presumably 2 divisions of 9. If you go with a simple geographical East vs West, then the West Division would be Oregon, Washington, UCLA, USC, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois? Illinois, Wisconsin, and Northwestern would be on the borders. So would they split up Wisconsin and Minnesota or Illinois and Northwestern? I think the Illinois and Northwestern fans would care less than the Badgers and Gophers, but it would seem dumb to split teams from the same state. So let's just assume the 9 I listed are in the West and everyone else is in the East.

So if you look at a football schedule, surely you would play the other 8 teams in your division, meaning you get to play 1 or 2 games against the other division. Since we'd be in with 5 of the newest Big Ten teams it will be completely different for us. Just wait for the complaints when USC has to play Michigan from the other division and UCLA plays Northwestern. Or Michigan gets Oregon and Ohio State gets Nebraska. There will be teams in your conference you only play once every 3 or 4 years.

Then if you look at basketball, we play 20 games. Either you don't play anyone twice or there are teams you won't play at all. What is the point of being a conference if you don't even play each other. And none of this brings into account the travel. Having teams in 4 different time zones can create some major problems. If this is really all about tv money, sorry folks you're not going to get a lot of people sitting around at midnight watching their team play on the west coast.

Someone mentioned, the SEC is remaining a southern conference. To me that means they're doing it right. If I'm the SEC I'm going after Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson, Louisville. That allows me to get quality teams, keep rivalries, and keep a geographically contiguous and concentrated set of teams in 2 time zones which greatly eases scheduling.

I think ultimately, the more teams group into a small number of conferences, the more meaningless a conference is.
I think you right in with this, but the problem is the SEC is/was such a better football conference than the BIG. Since the BIG could never get ND to join they had to go outside traditional geographic boundary’s to get more “power” in football. PSU and Nebraska (at least in theory for Nebraska) did this. So the big had:

1) tOSU
2) scUM
3) PSU
4) Nebraska

Still, with the SEC adding Texas and OU they have:

1) Alabama
2) Georgia
3) Florida
4) Tennessee
5) Texas
6) OU
7) A&M
8) Auburn

It was still way better than the BIG. Adding UCLA and USC in particular helped, but we are still behind the SEC (at least in my mind?)

The problem is that most of the “great” college football programs (leaving ND out) are in the South. That is why if I am the BIG I go after Clemson and FSU as hard as I can. There is nothing left in the West and if they could get Clemson and FSU they would have a top 8 that at least in theory would compete with the SEC.

I hate ND, but they really would help the BIG 10
 
#548      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
Grim??? It’s paradise!
It's an unrivalled geographical setting, for sure. My bro lived there for several years. Winters were... challenging. I visited a good friend there in July '96 and then spent the following week in Vancouver and out on the Island with my girlfriend. It was cloudless and 75-80 the entire time. Massive high pressure system just parked over the Pac NW. 25 years later my friend in Seattle told me that her friends and neighbors still talked about those two weeks in July '96!

Anyway, am not harshing on your home, just noting the meteorological reality. Rains less (by volume) than in NYC, from what I understand, and the weather systems often move through swiftly, like in SE England. No escaping November-April, however.
 
#549      
Is there a point where travel from the “strong west coast brands” that we brought in becomes so undesirable, that top recruits don’t go there, so they begin to be not as good, and then lose the brand strength we brought them for?
Never mind wishing to kick their feathery behinds (and pride goeth before the fall and so on), this guy doesn't seem to have done much traveling.

Getting to Champaign means flying into O'Hare and getting a rental car because you'll nver be able to get a seat on a football weekend (or so I'd think). Perhaps an easier way to get to champaign via air would be to fly to Indianapolis, rent a car and make the relatively short drive.

Getting to State College for Penn State is a real headache. It's in the middle of nowhere--a pretty nowhere but still nowhere--and flying in will be a challenge. Flying to Harrisburg and driving up? First you have to get to Harrisburg. From Philly it's a sizeable drive, ditto Pittsburgh. I'll betcha most of those seats in Happy Valley are driving from Pennsylvania.
 
#550      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
the guys team has been in the B1G less than an hour and he’s already disrespecting us . ugh
Analysis: I can promise you I will never make the drive to Illinois, and even a flight to watch the Fighting Illini may not be too appealing.

Well, he's correct, because the BB freight train will will kick their a$$es by then.

EDIT: HT to @MustangWally ... yeah, complete rube:
University of Indiana?
University of Purdue?
University of Rutgers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.