"Son, if you want to keep working here, lay off the drugs."Since you worked so hard.. Take time to relax and watch the some football. The Giants of ny will play the packers of green by attempting to kick an oblong ball through a big H
"Son, if you want to keep working here, lay off the drugs."Since you worked so hard.. Take time to relax and watch the some football. The Giants of ny will play the packers of green by attempting to kick an oblong ball through a big H
I dunno. With the money grab the way it is, nothings off the table imo. If the super conferences think they can grab 75% of the revenue on their own they will bolt. It all depends on the TV money being offered. Ultimately they control the cash flow and will dictate what they want to happen. Maybe they like it the way it is. Football is a different animal because the underdogs don’t have the opportunity they do in basketball. I certainly hope it stays like it is.Possible solution to college basketball. Superpowers and major conferences agree to rules along with NCAA. NCAA owns the NCAA tournament and I believe the NIT as well.
Superconferences and major conferences could possibly have their own tournament and invite the good teams from weaker conferences as needed.
But I think most would want the NCAA tournament in the current format. Conference winners+40 at large teams.
I assume he is playing because of the court ruling? He didn't get a waiver of I recall20 points for Miller vs TCU in his debut for the Sun Devils
CorrectI assume he is playing because of the court ruling? He didn't get a waiver of I recall
Bye, bye "college" basketball.It’s official. I don’t see how it ever comes back at this point.
They will adjust. One way is back loaded NIL contracts. Make offers that pay well if they stay all 4 years (w/exceptions for those who go pro early). Care will be required for those who don't make the grade and are "encouraged to go elsewhere".Bye, bye "college" basketball.
Or 2-3.They will adjust. One way is back loaded NIL contracts. Make offers that pay well if they stay all 4 years (w/exceptions for those who go pro early). Care will be required for those who don't make the grade and are "encouraged to go elsewhere".
Judge invalidated the NCAA's rule on sitting a year for two-time transfers. Many here see this as another step towards the end of the NCAA altogether. Can they govern anything at this point, and can anything they do be construed as a restraint on the player's ability to earn a living?I've been slow to keep up on this. Can someone provide a couple of summary sentences....thanks
Higher rated recruits will demand more upfront/guarantees and this will have a trickle down effect through the system. Same as any arm's race.They will adjust. One way is back loaded NIL contracts. Make offers that pay well if they stay all 4 years (w/exceptions for those who go pro early). Care will be required for those who don't make the grade and are "encouraged to go elsewhere".
The true point of no return will be that players won't even need to actually be enrolled as students in the University as it will be left up to the university themselves to determine who is eligible to represent the University on their athletic teams and they can use contracted employees if they wish. Think the UNC sham classes without any pretenses.Can they govern anything at this point, and can anything they do be construed as a restraint on the player's ability to earn a living?
I kinda like the idea, which does not originate with me, of there being BAs in Basketball (or whatever sport).The true point of no return will be that players won't even need to actually be enrolled as students in the University as it will be left up to the university themselves to determine who is eligible to represent the University on their athletic teams and they can use contracted employees if they wish. Think the UNC sham classes without any pretenses.
It may be worth paying a 5 star FR. After that, I suspect the way to win is to be the poacher. Don't spend money on FR. Save the NIL for proven transfer players. Don't spend NIL on anyone who doesn't play at least 5m/game (i.e. players 9-13 on most teams).Higher rated recruits will demand more upfront/guarantees and this will have a trickle down effect through the system. Same as any arm's race.
Pretty sure that is exactly what Underwood is doing. Notice the recruiting class for next year. Morez (5ish stars) and 2 guys who need a year to develop that aren’t likely receiving NIL as freshmen. If they develop and stay, great. If they move on, only cost us a scholly.It may be worth paying a 5 star FR. After that, I suspect the way to win is to be the poacher. Don't spend money on FR. Save the NIL for proven transfer players. Don't spend NIL on anyone who doesn't play at least 5m/game (i.e. players 9-13 on most teams).
Sigh. That ends up sounding awful close to how to build an NBA roster. (Drafted players that are home grown are cheap, so effectively no NIL.)
Was about to post the same tweet. There are certainly some outlandish stories I’ve heard that just make you shake your head…
I can only imagine these stories
What exactly are these stories? Trilly and you BOTH need to share...Was about to post the same tweet. There are certainly some outlandish stories I’ve heard that just make you shake your head…
limitless unrestricted free agency on steroids, with no salary caps, and no oversight, for a bunch of 18-24 year old student athletesI've been slow to keep up on this. Can someone provide a couple of summary sentences....thanks
Also very curiousWhat exactly are these stories? Trilly and you BOTH need to share...