Former Illini in College Hoops

#251      

foby

Bonnaroo Land
limitless unrestricted free agency on steroids, with no salary caps, and no oversight, for a bunch of 18-24 year old student athletes
The only buffer might be the admissions policies of the various institutions.
 
#256      
Judge invalidated the NCAA's rule on sitting a year for two-time transfers. Many here see this as another step towards the end of the NCAA altogether. Can they govern anything at this point, and can anything they do be construed as a restraint on the player's ability to earn a living?

And what are the limits on player movement now - again some are foreseeing mid-year transfers if a player gets a better NIL offer, or if his/her current team stinks. Would have seemed unthinkable a few years ago but now, who knows?
Why not switch teams at half time? I am being sort of /s
 
#262      

RichardKeenesCousin

Richard Keene's Cousin
Was about to post the same tweet. There are certainly some outlandish stories I’ve heard that just make you shake your head…
Tv Show Cool Story Bro GIF by Happy Place
 
#265      
Can they govern anything at this point, and can anything they do be construed as a restraint on the player's ability to earn a living?

Good summary. I don't get the doom-sayers, largely because I don't get the logic: Judge rules that a monopoly trying to lock athletes into a school is anti-competitive, ergo the NCAA must not be able to do anything and the sport is doomed.

Maybe I have a wild imagination, but I can imagine a world where the NCAA doesn't unreasonably restrict people from making their share of money while still having a sport. And yes, it will mean they'll have to adapt to the modern world. Athletes will share in the revenue, have a say in how they're compensated, etc.. It even seems to me that this model will prepare people for how the real world works (kinda how it should be).
 
#268      
Good summary. I don't get the doom-sayers, largely because I don't get the logic: Judge rules that a monopoly trying to lock athletes into a school is anti-competitive, ergo the NCAA must not be able to do anything and the sport is doomed.

Maybe I have a wild imagination, but I can imagine a world where the NCAA doesn't unreasonably restrict people from making their share of money while still having a sport. And yes, it will mean they'll have to adapt to the modern world. Athletes will share in the revenue, have a say in how they're compensated, etc.. It even seems to me that this model will prepare people for how the real world works (kinda how it should be).
You're describing a system of self-rule, where no one is responsible for setting rules by which all agree to abide by. By your definition, the NCAA cannot set any rules (we're quickly getting there IMHO), so therefore there will be no rules, which I think anyone with half a brain knows doesn't work, and cannot work. Most seem to forget that the NCAA is a member run organization where the schools decided and agreed upon a set of rules that all of its' member institutions would follow in the spirit of fair play, and later on, safety for the athletes. Left out of the equation were the athletes, who despite all assertions to the contrary, did receive something of value - a debt-free college education. Once the $ pot got large enough, athletes and their agents decided they deserved a bigger piece of the pie. One can argue for or against that construct, but the end result is quickly becoming anarchy, which IMHO, means the downfall of college football and basketball, and the likely end of all college athletics without the money sports to sustain their programs. The SEC and B1G are not going to join hands, sing Kumbaya, and then have a basketball season or football season.
 
#270      
What exactly are these stories? Trilly and you BOTH need to share...
Perhaps not the biggest story ever, but one reply to the Trilly tweet says Andre was caught riding his scooter on the runway at Willard Airport following an away game. Another describes him as the four most interesting players in college basketball.

All I know is that I still miss freshman Belo. When he was on he was completely magic.
 
#272      
You're describing a system of self-rule, where no one is responsible for setting rules by which all agree to abide by. By your definition, the NCAA cannot set any rules (we're quickly getting there IMHO), so therefore there will be no rules, which I think anyone with half a brain knows doesn't work, and cannot work. Most seem to forget that the NCAA is a member run organization where the schools decided and agreed upon a set of rules that all of its' member institutions would follow in the spirit of fair play, and later on, safety for the athletes. Left out of the equation were the athletes, who despite all assertions to the contrary, did receive something of value - a debt-free college education. Once the $ pot got large enough, athletes and their agents decided they deserved a bigger piece of the pie. One can argue for or against that construct, but the end result is quickly becoming anarchy, which IMHO, means the downfall of college football and basketball, and the likely end of all college athletics without the money sports to sustain their programs. The SEC and B1G are not going to join hands, sing Kumbaya, and then have a basketball season or football season.
Largely agree. The NCAA killed the Golden Goose by setting up said rules, but unfairly and capriciously enforcing them over several decades. If you choose not to enforce the rules in a judicious manner, chaos will ensue, which it has. The underlying issue, of course, being greed by the member institution leaders as well as the NCAA administrators. They are now reaping what they sowed, to the detriment of the fans that foot the bill, and ultimately student athletes.