Game Thread: Illinois vs Indiana

Status
Not open for further replies.
#301      
This is a serious question. Help me understand our offensive philosophy. We have them outsized everywhere and are controlling both boards.

Is Brad's thought process to take more threes because you can shoot a worse percentage, but gain a similar point outcome.

10 of 17 - 20 points and 3 trips to the line. So, 23 taking it to the rack

5 of 16 - 15 points.

We'd have to be shooting 50% from three to have the same result.
 
#303      
Seeing Nebraska and Purdue as 2 seeds and illinois 3 seed on the CBS bracket forecast has me scratching my head. Not that there’s much difference in expected 3rd round match up between a 2 and a 3, but still…..
 
#304      
Fouled 3x before he even gets inside the three point line then hammered in the act of shooting

🤡 show
On the shot, hit in the head too:

IMB_92IECD.gif
 
#305      
No way, being able to spell Wagler as the primary ballhandler and get him involved in off-ball actions opens up the whole playbook for us.

We had been getting very predictable and simple to guard (still very difficult to guard, but not for lack of knowing what's coming).
Coming in second half.
 
#306      
high-knees low-skills ref jeff ..............F ...................
Walton......................F - ..............
Kimble...................F --...........................

total jokes...........the charge on Jake was 3 lost points......
 
#312      
No way, being able to spell Wagler as the primary ballhandler and get him involved in off-ball actions opens up the whole playbook for us.

We had been getting very predictable and simple to guard (still very difficult to guard, but not for lack of knowing what's coming).
This was the adjustment that many were concerned about. How do we keep Wagler as active without the ball? Kylan is the superior, prototypical PG, but Wagler is an elite scorer.

Going to have to figure it out.
 
#324      
This is a serious question. Help me understand our offensive philosophy. We have them outsized everywhere and are controlling both boards.

Is Brad's thought process to take more threes because you can shoot a worse percentage, but gain a similar point outcome.

10 of 17 - 20 points and 3 trips to the line. So, 23 taking it to the rack

5 of 16 - 15 points.

We'd have to be shooting 50% from three to have the same result.
Threes result in more offensive rebounds. That is a huge factor in comparing 2-pt shots vs. 3-pt shots.

Plus, these things don't happen in a vacuum. 2-pt shots help loosen things up for 3-pt shots. 3-pt shots help loosen things up for 2-pt shots. Threes don't have to go in to be effective for your offense, because it opens up the court, allowing for drives and offensive rebounds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back