Illini Basketball 2016-2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,579      
Curious what everyone's estimation of minutes at PG are. I'm imagining the depth chart to be:

Tracy (do we have any reports on him?)
Tate
TJL
DJW
Hill
Not gonna go there.

My list wouldn't include DJW since he's a combo forward. He looks to have some decent ball skills for a guy his size, but in no way is he going to play a single minute as PG.

I've read good reports on Abrams, but IMO we don't really know until we see him in game action. Will be interesting to see if his minutes are monitored/limited, especially early in the season.
 
#1,580      
from my scrimmage observations to start with

Tracy 15 min
TJL 15 min (if ok)
Tate 5 min
Jones 5 min

No way Tracy only plays 15 minutes. If he's is healthy, he will play between 25 to 30 minutes per game. The drop off between him and our second best option is just too drastic. The other 10 to 15 minutes will be split between Lucas and Tate, with Tate getting more of that share around the beginning of the season before Lucas gets acclimated with college ball. As a side note, why would Jones average 5 minutes per game according to your analysis? This isn't rec league where everyone participates.
 
#1,581      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
from my scrimmage observations to start with

Tracy 15 min
TJL 15 min (if ok)
Tate 5 min
Jones 5 min

How did TJL play in the scrimmage?

IMO, your number for Abrams is too low and the TJL number is too high. Perhaps way too high. Impossible to know, at this time.
 
#1,582      
Curious what everyone's estimation of minutes at PG are. I'm imagining the depth chart to be:

Tracy (do we have any reports on him?)
Tate
TJL
DJW
Hill
Not gonna go there.

Abrams
Lucas
Tate
Hill
Shouldn't need more than that.
 
#1,583      
How did TJL play in the scrimmage?

IMO, your number for Abrams is too low and the TJL number is too high. Perhaps way too high. Impossible to know, at this time.

Lucas has not played in any of the scrimmages. He did skill work on the side. He was not cleared for scrimmage situations yet.
 
#1,585      
I think there are at three least considerations on PG minutes, especially early in the season. First, Abrams is coming off injury and needs only to play enough to tune up his game and not take any unnecessary risk of reinjury. Second, Abrams is coming off injury and we need Tate and TJL tuned up and ready to go if he gets hurt again or cannot go 100% for 20 plus minutes. And third, TJL is going to be the sole returning PG next year and Groce needs to get him as much tick as possible to get him ready to go next year. While everyone seems pretty high on Frazier, we need to know we have someone who can step in from Day 1. The starting job is going to be TJL's unless and until Frazier demonstrates he is the better option. In the non-conference schedule I could see Tracy averaging less than 20 a game, and less than 25 by the end of the year. Since this is Tate's last year and Groce will want him to get some playing time, and since we need TJL to see some time, and while the split of the remaining minutes is going to be dependent upon their play, I would guess that they split the balance pretty equally. But I have higher expectations for Tate than most people (mostly because I want him to succeed).
I hope we will see Tracy being a bench PG coach for TJL while Tate is on the floor (and Tate doing the same for that matter when Tracy is out there). We need TJL to absorb as much as possible this year.
 
#1,586      
No way Tracy only plays 15 minutes. If he's is healthy, he will play between 25 to 30 minutes per game. The drop off between him and our second best option is just too drastic.

This would be my guess going into the season, but it's pretty much a guess at this point.

TJL might get some chances during the non-conf, but I wouldn't expect him to overtake Tate for BIG play. JG really values limiting T/O and PG decision making, and I have to believe a freshman won't overtake a senior barring something special.
 
#1,587      

Epsilon

M tipping over
Pdx
#1,590      

Tevo

Wilmette, IL
This would be my guess going into the season, but it's pretty much a guess at this point.

TJL might get some chances during the non-conf, but I wouldn't expect him to overtake Tate for BIG play. JG really values limiting T/O and PG decision making, and I have to believe a freshman won't overtake a senior barring something special.

You mean something special like if the freshman were able to put the ball in the basket?
 
#1,594      
I hope MLT plays every game for Wright State and averages 21ppg.

He would deserve every minute.
 
#1,595      
A little off topic, but not much. I watched Ray Rice scrimmage with the team a couple of weeks ago. He had several former teammates still on the team: Hill, Abrams, Black, Finke, Morgan, Tate. Rice fit right in, laughing and joking with those guys. He even knew the new guys' names. He referred to "Kip" at one point, for example.

The coaches also must be ok with Rice to let him come in and scrimmage with the team when there was a recruit playing, too.
 
#1,598      
Why wouldn't they be?

Just a guess, but a lot of people questioned rice as being part of a chemistry problem when the team got some wins when he was out and looked a bit off to end the year. I never bought into rice being the problem, but some (especially on scout) seemed to think he was a problem.
 
#1,599      
Why wouldn't they be?
Remember the friction between Cosby and Rice? At that time, theories began to circulate that Rice was a source of bad chemistry in the team. There was never any substantiation offered to address that charge, and I think a lot of sensible people dismissed it as being impossible to confirm short of following the team around in the locker room and stuff.

Ray is bae, afaik.
 
#1,600      
I think most of that talk settled around Rice's playing style and the team needing him to take tough shots. We were definitely challenged, offensively. Chemistry can mean many different things depending on who you're talking to, though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.