Huh?
Basically it seems that people don't think he will come back from these injuries. I think the team will have a better option at the 1 spot with Tracy there than we have had for the past three years.
Huh?
Basically it seems that people don't think he will come back from these injuries. I think the team will have a better option at the 1 spot with Tracy there than we have had for the past three years.
I do not think he meant Fletcher's numbers. I believe he meant that Tracy is stronger, faster, jumping higher, more explosive, with a better jump shot than at anytime in his career. That describes a much better overall player, not just Fletcher's numbers. You have a senior who suffered 2 major injuries/surgeries, has not played in more than two years, and comes back a much better player than ever before.
Yeah I'm not making the point that he's a better player or a better shooter. I'm making he point that the numbers prove he is stronger and jumping higher. Both of those add up to being more explosive while also, most likely, carrying over to his speed. I'm only talking measurable athletic qualities, which has been the subject of many posts about athletes returning from achilles injuries. In those areas only, the numbers don't lie.
I don't know if he's going to be "better" but people that have seen him play recently have made it seem like he is indeed faster, stronger, and more explosive. Not sure about the jump shot, but that would be the least surprising thing to improve.
I'm not surprised that Tracy has been able to get to this point physically but I am still curious on what his game will look like when he plays real competition.
Newman I have to share your contrarian view, I don't know what Tracy we will have. I would gladly take the one we had two years ago, I thought his game was coming along. With the layoff and injuries comes the mental aspects of the game and fear of re-injury.
With the return of Abrams and the addition of TJL and Clayton Jones
I love Clayton Jones. He has been a tough cookie since on the court since I first met him. That said, Clayton Jones is a walk on. Walk ons do not play unless something has gone terribly right or terribly wrong.
I thought he looked pretty good at the scrimmages, bet he competes.....
Even if he looks good in scrimmages he will not play over TJL, who needs to develop for our future, unless TJL is injured or just plain awful.
Maybe he'd have the ability to play over Tate, but he won't, especially early in the year because Tate is just so much further ahead in the system and experience at this point. At the time where these three become equals or near equals, TJL plays over all.
All this said, I again want it to be clear that I love Clayton Jones. I just don't see it happening.
Would that be considered a Love Jones??
Would that be considered a Love Jones??
First day of practice. Very high hopes (within reason and assuming good health) for this season.